If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

6024 EGM

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by skinnycow, Aug 16, 2010.

  1. charlie harry

    charlie harry New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2011
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well after reading Mr Underhills statement this shows that the society put the loco at risk to defend Mr Watson. So the crimson pirate that says they put the loco first, is an under statement.

    regards
    Charlie.
     
  2. Steve from GWR

    Steve from GWR Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2010
    Messages:
    1,292
    Likes Received:
    14
    Thanks to Steven for explaining more about the situation.

    I have sympathy for both him and the Society, and can totally understand his action. The situation was sad for all associated with 6024.

    It's a pity that the only winners here have been the lawyers.

    With that all said, personally I also feel very grateful to the buyers of the loco (the Royal Scot people and Mr Hosking) for rescuing my favourite loco from an uncertain future.
     
  3. Stewie Griffin

    Stewie Griffin Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2009
    Messages:
    398
    Likes Received:
    5
    This is one of those unfortunate situations that is bound to send ripples through the movement, and (while phrasing this in a neutral manner) hopefully it will assist in prompting other societies and organisations to ensure the appropriate 'checks and balances' are in place to prevent this sort of thing happening to them.

    There is so much more that could be said, but sometimes discretion is the better part of valour.
     
  4. dp266

    dp266 Member Account Suspended

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2008
    Messages:
    374
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Project Management
    Location:
    County Palatine of Lancaster
    Societies like this are not legal entities in their own right unlike a registered charity or limited company. The individuals within are the legal entities in their own right. This means that any action in law is against an individual or group of individuals as private citizens. It needs, as in this case, the society to agree to indemnify the individuals. I've seen this before in another arena and it is destructive. Perhaps all societies need to be sure they do not indemnify individuals if they are set up in the same way. a cautionary tale!
     
  5. Stewie Griffin

    Stewie Griffin Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2009
    Messages:
    398
    Likes Received:
    5
    I understood that as an Industrial and Provident Society registered with the FSA, 6024 Preservation Society Limited (company number IP21746R) was a separate legal entity?

    S3 of the Industrial and Provident Societies Act 1965 states that a registered society shall by virtue of its registration be a body corporate by its registered name, by which it may sue and be sued. I defer to Mr Underhill's letter (and the fact I know nothing further of the facts of the case) as to why the decision to pursue individuals as opposed to the society was taken.
     
  6. rivetcounter

    rivetcounter New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2011
    Messages:
    10
    Likes Received:
    0
    After reading some of the comments in Downmain - Steam Railway I also question how has the management team of 6024 remained in their positions, in many businesses if you lose your company hundreds of thousands of pounds you would be sacked and possibly prosecuted. This is of course my opinion and mine only?
     
  7. ChuffChuff

    ChuffChuff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2005
    Messages:
    348
    Likes Received:
    100
    Occupation:
    CEO
    Location:
    South West
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    The management team of any company answer to the shareholders. The amount of money made or lost is irrelevant. The shareholders opinions of performance is all that matters. Why change a management team if you agree with the actions they took?

    Personally, I think all involved with 6024 should be commended for standing firm with an individual in the society. To have walked away and let one person take all the "blame" would have been easy but weak in my opinion.

    I have my own opinions on the specific situation, but I only know the details in the public arena.

    Neil.
     
  8. Coboman

    Coboman Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2010
    Messages:
    534
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    GNR Outpost
    One thing I find a little confusing in that letter. "The Defendants (whose lawyers also acted under a ‘no win, no fee’ agreement)"
    If they has a no win no fee agreement, how come they ended up with such a huge bill that required 6024 to be sold?
    Jim
     
  9. Steve from GWR

    Steve from GWR Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2010
    Messages:
    1,292
    Likes Received:
    14
    I think that means that the 6024 Society won't also have to pay their own lawyers' bills, since they lost. Just Mr Underhill's.

    Similarly, if 6024 had won the action, Mr Underhill would have presumably been liable for the society's legal costs, but not his own.

    The lawyers always wiin, though.
     
  10. Coboman

    Coboman Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2010
    Messages:
    534
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    GNR Outpost
    Yes of cause.
    Blimey, if that bill was for only approximately half the legal costs, its scary how much they are allowed to charge!
    Important lesson here for any preservation society. Don't air your dirty washing in your publications. It will come to no good.
    Jim
     
  11. GWRman

    GWRman New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2010
    Messages:
    168
    Likes Received:
    244
    Couldn't agree more. They should have kicked them out and kept thier loco.

    I can't help but feel the 6024 Soc. has made the best out of a bad thing: They stuck with the 1 or 2 members that got them into this mess, they've lost thier loco but now it's effectively owned by J Hosking they have no more money issues, yet those 1 or 2 members are still at the top...
     
  12. Stu in Torbay

    Stu in Torbay Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2005
    Messages:
    2,829
    Likes Received:
    42
    Occupation:
    GPS Navigation Engineer
    Location:
    Goodrington Bank, Paignton
    Are you certain of that?
     
  13. skinnycow

    skinnycow New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    0
  14. 21B

    21B Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2009
    Messages:
    2,944
    Likes Received:
    6,303
    It is scary how much it costs to properly prepare a case of this nature. A lot of manhours are required. I am not suggesting that you can't make a good living as a lawyer, but they incur significant cost too. The 6024 society lawyers just took all their hours "on the chin"
    I completely agree with the second point though. Think before you write!
     
  15. stu the roadie

    stu the roadie New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2011
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    it has been a very sad episode in 6024's preservation history,

    I have a great affection for the locomotive as My father helped in the restoration of the locomotive (he was involed from when the loco was purchased from barry until the competion in 1989 and his name is on the plaque in the cab) and spent many years at Quainton seeing a pile of parts being transformed into a working locomotive,
    talking to my father about what has happened over the last few years and he said there were a few power struggles within the society during the initial restoration, but they were always resolved internaly,
    I feel that the departure of Steve Underhill has been detrimental to the society, the loco's avaliability due to repair work has increased noticably since his departure,
    and his vast knowledge and years of experience of working on the King has been lost,
    the sale of the Loco to Mr Hosking is a good move as the future is now secure, but I believe that the whole situation could have been avoided
    Cheers
    Stu
     
  16. michaelh

    michaelh Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    3,080
    Likes Received:
    1,291
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Very comfortably early retired
    Location:
    1029
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I contributed a few £'s when Chris Tankard started the project (I was only earning about £12 a week at the time) and I too find this course of events disappointing, but I am glad that the loco's future is assured.
     

Share This Page