If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Modifying existing locos

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by Reading General, Nov 4, 2011.

  1. Spamcan81

    Spamcan81 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Messages:
    35,831
    Likes Received:
    22,270
    Occupation:
    Training moles
    Location:
    The back of beyond
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Quite possibly as he was at Doncaster at the time.
     
  2. Stu in Torbay

    Stu in Torbay Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2005
    Messages:
    2,829
    Likes Received:
    42
    Occupation:
    GPS Navigation Engineer
    Location:
    Goodrington Bank, Paignton
    But hopefully not on the railway!!!

    As for loco mods. I think there is a distinction between preservation and operation. If something is truly preserved in the strictest sense it is stuffed and mounted, if used, its not preserving but is wearing it out. If we are talking operation, then it needs to comply with the regs - obviously, but also may need modifying operationally. E.g, cutting down 6024 for fit the network, and if needs be, converting to oil firing, or fitting more reliable bearings etc.. A certain amount of modification to satisfy the aim of keeping the thing viably running on a modern railway has to be accepted, or we return to the stuff and mount option.
     
  3. Sidmouth

    Sidmouth Resident of Nat Pres Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2005
    Messages:
    10,146
    Likes Received:
    9,777
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Alderan !
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    http://railways.national-preservation.com/showthread.php/33266-Modifying-existing-locos/page2

    Ian , as per my post 12 two schools did run with a high sided (same one ) (not 8 wheeled) tender similar in outline to that 30926 now carries
     
  4. BR8P

    BR8P New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2011
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    2
    Yes extra rear dampers were fitted to supplement the already existing one. After correction of the front damper air spaces in restoration, no further need for research into draughting was considered necessary. However, in main line running, recurring problems were encountered with melting firebars and clinkering at the rear of the grate, due to lack of air through the rear of the ashpan. When a new ashpan was fabricated to replace the life-expired one made in restoration, the single centre rear damper was supplemented by two outside ones, giving increased volume of air and better flow to the rear of the grate.

    The major contributors to the poor steaming experienced in BR day's as found and rectified during the initial rebuild was a wrongly proportioned chimney and blastpipe as well as the already mentioned less then adequate front damper air spaces.
     

Share This Page