If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Future of WCML Steam

Тема в разделе 'Steam Traction', создана пользователем Big Al, 15 авг 2012.

  1. oldmrheath

    oldmrheath Well-Known Member

    Дата регистрации:
    18 июн 2006
    Сообщения:
    2.334
    Симпатии:
    2.563
    I have Ralph and completely agree- my guess is that a 6-car Pendolino will offer a few extra seats, but 8-car would be better....
     
  2. ADB968008

    ADB968008 Guest

    Surely the purpose of a direct train is to be faster ?
    Euston via Manchester to Blackpool, it'll still be faster to change at Preston, unless they start reducing Scottish services stopping at Preston ?
    Euston to Bolton will be nice though.
     
  3. Sheff

    Sheff Resident of Nat Pres

    Дата регистрации:
    21 апр 2006
    Сообщения:
    8.062
    Симпатии:
    3.138
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Род занятий:
    Retired Engineer & Heritage Volunteer
    Адрес:
    N Warks
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I wondered if they are proposing to run semi-fasts, and that's how they are going to add the extra stops for Nuneaton and MK? Could be interesting as LM were also to introduce some faster direct London services (rather than via Northampton).
     
  4. ADB968008

    ADB968008 Guest

    OOI what's the future for Blackpool south ? Will this be electrified or closed even ?

    This has to be one of the last former mainlines in the country not to have seen preserved steam, but how it's still even open interests me ?
     
  5. Spamcan81

    Spamcan81 Nat Pres stalwart

    Дата регистрации:
    25 авг 2007
    Сообщения:
    35.847
    Симпатии:
    22.295
    Род занятий:
    Training moles
    Адрес:
    The back of beyond
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Not always designed to be faster. Some people prefer not to have to change trains so a direct train is more appealing to that sector of the market even if not quite as quick.
     
  6. david1984

    david1984 Resident of Nat Pres

    Дата регистрации:
    13 сен 2005
    Сообщения:
    12.910
    Симпатии:
    1.387
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    Birmingham
    Just a long siding currently isn't it ?, Im suprise South hasn't been looked at for some capacity developments, given it's proximity to Pleasure Beach, which is the ultimate destination for many going to Blackpool, and the South end of the Promenade as well, especially so as it appears North is losing a few platforms during Electrifcation works thus reducing spare capacity there.
     
  7. 46223

    46223 Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Дата регистрации:
    10 апр 2011
    Сообщения:
    6.694
    Симпатии:
    6.343
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    Lancs
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Plenty of room for expanding the station at Blackpool South. There is a large car park at the side which always looks
    empty every time I pass it. In the latest SR someone has suggested running 'top 'n tail' steam into Blackpool South on
    Sundays from Kirkham.
     
  8. Fred Kerr

    Fred Kerr Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Дата регистрации:
    24 мар 2006
    Сообщения:
    8.383
    Симпатии:
    5.368
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Род занятий:
    Freelance photo - journalist
    Адрес:
    Southport
    Its the "Alice in Wonderland" definition that "words mean what I say they mean not what YOU think they mean"

    Sadly, in this case, the train service to Blackpool has been defined as "direct" [i.e. no change] which some people re-interpret as being "faster". As noted by others it will probably be the case that the Blackpool service will be a Manchester service (via Crewe or Stoke ?) extended to provide Bolton and Blackpool stops (a franchise commitment) whilst also doubling the number of through Euston - Preston trains (another franchise commitment).
    Given the First Group also operates services to Blackpool / Barrow / Edinburgh / Glasgow with its First TransPenine (FTP) franchise, it will be interesting to see how the FTP timetable will change to either complement or compete with the First West Coast timetable.
    The new franchise will provide an interesting comparison with Virgin Trains and Virgin Cross Country operations which ran complementary services for a while.
     
  9. osprey

    osprey Resident of Nat Pres

    Дата регистрации:
    3 окт 2007
    Сообщения:
    10.498
    Симпатии:
    2.857
    Род занятий:
    semi-retired, currently doing R&D for my patents
    Адрес:
    Halifax
    Could'nt these comments be transferred to the correct thread please.....
     
  10. RalphW

    RalphW Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Administrator Friend

    Дата регистрации:
    11 сен 2005
    Сообщения:
    36.453
    Симпатии:
    9.914
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Род занятий:
    Retired-ish, Part time rail tour steward.
    Адрес:
    Northwich
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    So be it....
     
  11. Big Al

    Big Al Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator

    Дата регистрации:
    30 май 2009
    Сообщения:
    22.600
    Симпатии:
    22.733
    Адрес:
    1016
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I'm assuming that pending whatever happens after the temporary franchise extension I presume that Virgin will get, paths for steam and charters generally will change little. If so then I hope that RTC/SD/Compass etc don't find themselves given a provisional steam path into 2013 to have it removed when the new operator plays around with services.
     
  12. Christopher125

    Christopher125 Part of the furniture

    Дата регистрации:
    30 ноя 2005
    Сообщения:
    2.846
    Симпатии:
    581
    Адрес:
    Isle of Wight
    I don't see any reason to think that things will be changed anytime soon, and they'd still need approval from the rail regulator - even the new services proposed in the bids were subject to ORR approval.

    Chris
     
  13. campainr

    campainr Well-Known Member

    Дата регистрации:
    9 окт 2009
    Сообщения:
    1.398
    Симпатии:
    53
    A bit of a late reply but I think platform capacity at New Street rather makes things difficult with anything longer than 6 vehicles - as then the full length of a platform is required as opposed to only the A or B end. That would be why the figure of 6 has been quoted.
     

Поделиться этой страницей