If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Steam Dreams Sunday Luncheon to Stratford-O-A, 6.10.13

Discussion in 'What's Going On' started by 6136, Oct 3, 2013.

  1. Alberta 45562

    Alberta 45562 Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2006
    Messages:
    4,893
    Likes Received:
    585
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Train Simulator Developer
    Location:
    Cudworth,Barnsley
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I was told that the Brit had failed it's ftr yesterday,this apparently came from someone at west coast but I can't say anything really,can't believe there would be such a cock up to stop the stock into the station.

    And what the hell is all this piffle and arguing above? Like a bunch of bloody schoolchildren.
     
  2. twr12

    twr12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2007
    Messages:
    1,659
    Likes Received:
    821
    If it's true about 70000 failing FTR, I wonder if all the moaners will take their words back?
    More likely to demand that 70013 took its place, never mind emptying ashpan, coaling, water, support crew!
     
  3. Southernman99

    Southernman99 Member Friend

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2009
    Messages:
    946
    Likes Received:
    698
    If the stock and loco were moved to Acton yard, 70000 wouldn't have failed its FTR.

    Lifted from The Cathex facebook page:
    Our current understanding of the situation (and please bear with us as we may not have all the details at this time) is that the train was moved to Acton as planned by Network Rail to avoid being trapped by engineering works at its normal depot at Southall. The train was then due to move from Acton sidings to Paddington at 8am this morning however what Network Rail had neglected in their planning was that there was also a separate possession which came into effect at 1am today blocking our route out of Acton sidings to Paddington this only came to light at a very late stage yesterday and for a number of reasons, although every effort was made, it was not possible to make an emergency movement. Once 1am passed it became impossible to move the train and the cancellation resulted.
     
  4. spindizzy

    spindizzy Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2009
    Messages:
    899
    Likes Received:
    44
    If it failed its FTR how did it carry out its ECS move? Such a shame Steam Dreams aren't having much luck at the moment.
     
  5. hatherton hall

    hatherton hall Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2007
    Messages:
    1,068
    Likes Received:
    351
    Indeed. Sorry Mark but it seems implausible that 70000 failed its FTR as the train, according to Real Times, arrived at Acton at 1904 on Saturday evening.

    Network Rail clearly have to stand up and be counted here. If they overlooked a further blockade preventing the ECS to get to Paddington, then it is they to blame.

    The sad outcome of this is that for some passengers, this may have their first and only tour on the year with the hope of spending quality time at one of the UK's most popular destinations, only for those plans to be scuppered by a major cock up. Not my Steam Dreams, not by West Coast but by Network Rail.

    What compensation will they be prepared to pay out for this serious oversight?
     
  6. 33056

    33056 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2006
    Messages:
    626
    Likes Received:
    26
    Occupation:
    Professional "basher"
    Location:
    On a train somewhere in Europe.
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    The railtour stock and a class 33 are stabled on Acton LANE reception road, opposite Willesden Euroterminal - I wonder if somebody has got that and Acton YARD mixed up :rolleyes:

    Don't know about 70000 as that is still shown at Southall on TOPS, it is definitely not with the stock which I would expect it to be if the whole train was to be moved to avoid any engineers possessions.
     
  7. KentYeti

    KentYeti Guest

    What! :eek:

    That's the whole point of Nat Pres. Just occasionally taking a short break to very briefly mention the details of a mainline steam trip.

    Well, that's what I've always thought.
     
  8. Big Al

    Big Al Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    May 30, 2009
    Messages:
    22,600
    Likes Received:
    22,732
    Location:
    1016
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Good one Bryan. But when you have to trawl through a string of invective verging on personal (and of course, anonymous) abuse - which is even more insidious - then there is a real risk that the sharing and informing discussion will be lost. Compare what sometimes goes on here with the Steam Traction section where examples of really good quality copy can be found. Little wonder that the Mods have to slice out the junk on this thread.

    As for the SD trip. On Saturday, word of 70000 failing its FTR had reached Norwich by late afternoon. On the whole, these kind of rumours are not spread wildly as they do little for the steam movement. So until someone from Southall says otherwise I'm assuming that two things happened and the NR error conveniently hides a wider embarrassment.
     
  9. mrKnowwun

    mrKnowwun Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2011
    Messages:
    4,366
    Likes Received:
    2,823
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    West Byfleet
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    One the whole the steam movement is in no way different from anything else when it comes to rumours and speculation , in fact it is oft worse.
     
  10. KentYeti

    KentYeti Guest

    You are right Al. And of course there has to be a balance. But those that post here are often older, set in their ways, won't listen much to others and are quite argumentative types. That is the nature of quite a few frequent posters on discussion forums. I know that I am one of those, :oops:, although as I explained elsewhere I tend these days to adopt a quite flippant, sometimes humorous approach. It helps me through the bad days.

    But I do try to stay serious when a thread, or part of one, obviously needs that. And there are some serious issues here. Such a late cancellation for whatever reason, is not what mainline steam needs.
     
  11. Spamcan81

    Spamcan81 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Messages:
    35,845
    Likes Received:
    22,295
    Occupation:
    Training moles
    Location:
    The back of beyond
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    A friend of mine was to be on restaurant car duty on the trip and told me it was an FTR failure on Saturday.
     
  12. 83B

    83B Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2005
    Messages:
    314
    Likes Received:
    121
    When would the FTR have been undertaken and the locomotive declared a failure? Surely before one o'clock in the morning when customers were being contacted announcing cancellation!

    Or did Steam Dreams plan on running it with a diesel only then for the stock to get stuck!!

    Simple questions that require simple answers. Someone out there knows the answers!
     
  13. 83B

    83B Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2005
    Messages:
    314
    Likes Received:
    121
    Interestingly, Dave of UK Steam, the man who is always in the know, states on his website that the tour was cancelled due to "Network Rail Planning Issues". Surely if it was a FTR failure then this would have been mentioned. Just a thought.
     
  14. Steamage

    Steamage Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2005
    Messages:
    4,751
    Likes Received:
    1,126
    Location:
    Oxford
    I think an FTR failure isn't enough on its own to cancel a train like this. SD would have tried to run it if possible, ideally with another steam loco (there's a small chance that Ollie might have been able to step in, or perhaps one of the other Southall-based locos), but if not then with a diesel. Seems to me that the cancellation was due to the stock being blocked in a siding by engineering work. How much of that was bad planning, and how much was cock-up on the night, we won't know unless an insider cares to enlighten us.
     
  15. Southernman99

    Southernman99 Member Friend

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2009
    Messages:
    946
    Likes Received:
    698
    It does occur to me. The train was stabled in Acton lane reception siding, which is on the LM region. The train then had to move to the GW region. Two different regions. Two different possessions.
     
  16. Duty Druid

    Duty Druid Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2010
    Messages:
    11,114
    Likes Received:
    4,713
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    All I know is, that a mate went to film the ECS move back to Southall on Monday, and Britannia had gone - she'd already snuck back to Southall - probably sometime on Sunday!!!
     
  17. spindizzy

    spindizzy Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2009
    Messages:
    899
    Likes Received:
    44
    But was she ever there one wonders?
     
  18. Duty Druid

    Duty Druid Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2010
    Messages:
    11,114
    Likes Received:
    4,713
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I think we can assume that she was! But then again........................................ ..................

    (My mate was going to go and film the consist, but decided to go and watch ice hokey instead..............................................)
     
  19. 33056

    33056 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2006
    Messages:
    626
    Likes Received:
    26
    Occupation:
    Professional "basher"
    Location:
    On a train somewhere in Europe.
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Almost certain 70000 did not go with the stock to Acton Lane; it wasn't there on Sunday - just one class 33 and the coaches (Still trying to work out why send the stock round to the LM to stable for a train out of Paddington :confused: )
     
  20. 5944

    5944 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2006
    Messages:
    8,871
    Likes Received:
    9,289
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Train Maintainer for GTR at Hornsey
    Location:
    Letchworth
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    There was a path from Hanwell loop to Paddington on Sunday morning in RTT. Bit odd if the stock is already in the Acton area.
     

Share This Page