If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Alternative history steam 1980

Тема в разделе 'Steam Traction', создана пользователем Bikermike, 1 июл 2022.

  1. Copper-capped

    Copper-capped Part of the furniture

    Дата регистрации:
    19 апр 2017
    Сообщения:
    3.592
    Симпатии:
    4.209
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    Stanthorpe, QLD, Australia
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    He was good for a hat trick…
     
    Steve и Jamessquared нравится это.
  2. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Дата регистрации:
    8 мар 2008
    Сообщения:
    28.096
    Симпатии:
    65.890
    Адрес:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    From his stovepipe hat to his drainpipe trousers, he was a credit to his iron monger …

    Tom
     
    Dunfanaghy Road, johnofwessex и Copper-capped нравится это.
  3. mdewell

    mdewell Well-Known Member Friend

    Дата регистрации:
    23 мар 2005
    Сообщения:
    1.955
    Симпатии:
    3.047
    Род занятий:
    UK & Ireland Heritage Railways Webmaster
    Адрес:
    Ruabon, Wrexham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Copper-capped нравится это.
  4. johnofwessex

    johnofwessex Resident of Nat Pres

    Дата регистрации:
    6 апр 2015
    Сообщения:
    9.812
    Симпатии:
    7.963
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Род занятий:
    Thorn in my managers side
    Адрес:
    72
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    @Jamessquared you have hit the nail on the head, while the Southern DID manage to electrify, shortage of capital meant that it had to be 'on the cheap' no new coaches, just rebuilt steam stock, no 'Total Route Modernisation' - colour light signals, electricity in stations, modernisation of freight handling etc which of course was in no small part driven by Railway Managements lack of information about costs, the reluctance of British Industry - especially the coal mines to invest etc etc
     
  5. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Дата регистрации:
    18 июн 2011
    Сообщения:
    29.365
    Симпатии:
    29.879
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Or, in other words, theSouthern went for incremental improvement, banking what gains it could, rather than relying on a big bang outcome.

    “Total Route Modernisation” was a concept first introduced by NSE for the Chiltern line; I see the desire for it killing plenty of perfectly decent ideas because there’s an excessive desire for perfection.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
     
  6. johnofwessex

    johnofwessex Resident of Nat Pres

    Дата регистрации:
    6 апр 2015
    Сообщения:
    9.812
    Симпатии:
    7.963
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Род занятий:
    Thorn in my managers side
    Адрес:
    72
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    But if it had the capital it needed then the improvements would have been far greater
     
  7. Fred Kerr

    Fred Kerr Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Дата регистрации:
    24 мар 2006
    Сообщения:
    8.389
    Симпатии:
    5.374
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Род занятий:
    Freelance photo - journalist
    Адрес:
    Southport
    Incremental improvement depend on a long-term plan and once the Government became involved - especially after forcing the creation of the Big Four - long-term planning became more difficult hence the consideration of the Total Route Modernisation concept where all is done at once when funds are mad available. Look at today where incremental improvement should include fill-in electrification but the Total Route Modernisation of the Trans-Pennine electrification as part of the Northern Powerhouse concept is as far away as ever in terms of funding as HS2 becomes the political flag bearer of railway funding.
     
  8. Jimc

    Jimc Part of the furniture

    Дата регистрации:
    8 сен 2005
    Сообщения:
    4.117
    Симпатии:
    4.821
    Род занятий:
    Once computers, now part time writer I suppose.
    Адрес:
    SE England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    There's also a problem - at least with modern management IME - that big projects are valued over small ones. Its a great deal easier to get senior executives to get behind one big project than ten small ones, even if the likely business advance is the same and the risk is lower with small projects.
     
    35B и Jamessquared нравится это.
  9. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Дата регистрации:
    18 июн 2011
    Сообщения:
    29.365
    Симпатии:
    29.879
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Indeed, I well remember one large programme coming about because it could get budget when the small projects that it comprised of couldn’t.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
     
  10. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Дата регистрации:
    18 июн 2011
    Сообщения:
    29.365
    Симпатии:
    29.879
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Would they? Would the SR have invested as you suggest, or would they have invested in more electrification on the same basis as the other schemes?

    We know that the Southern and it’s constituents had made significant non-electrification investments - I spent much of my childhood enjoying the view of one such, the Durnsford Road flyover! Reading Fiennes, I’m aware that the LNER (at least) invested significantly in control capabilities. With the available technology of the period, were the railways actually constrained by lack of capital from investing in “total route modernisation”?


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
     

Поделиться этой страницей