If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Current and Proposed New-Builds

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by aron33, Aug 15, 2017.

  1. Monkey Magic

    Monkey Magic Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2018
    Messages:
    3,223
    Likes Received:
    6,452
    Location:
    Here, there, everywhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Not much different to a war on the line weekend :)
     
  2. Steve

    Steve Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2006
    Messages:
    10,526
    Likes Received:
    7,335
    Occupation:
    Gentleman of leisure, nowadays
    Location:
    Near Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    That's dangerous talk referring to re-enactors as dummies. And what do many of those on heritage railways do other than re-enact the past?;)
     
    Sheff and Richard Roper like this.
  3. marshall5

    marshall5 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2010
    Messages:
    1,834
    Likes Received:
    2,331
    Location:
    i.o.m
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    From where did you get this information? I've looked on the official website, FB page and North Bay Engineering's FB page without seeing any reference to the frames being built. Until the shutdown North Bay Engineering were, however, assembling the frames for the Southwold replica.
    Just interested.
    Ray.
     
  4. David Humphreys

    David Humphreys Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2011
    Messages:
    87
    Likes Received:
    260
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Managing Director
    Location:
    Scarborough
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Think 'He gist' refers to 'Hengist'.

    I can confirm that Mountaineer boiler was finished just before our shut down three weeks ago. We were 1 day of the first hydraulic test, which will now be job number one when we return from the Covid shut down.

    Frames have not been started.

    David Humphreys
    Managing Director
    North Bay Railway Group
     
    ross, LesterBrown, marshall5 and 3 others like this.
  5. MattA

    MattA Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2014
    Messages:
    277
    Likes Received:
    304
    Location:
    82F
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    @marshall5
    I see that you too have been thrown astray by someone else's lack of proof reading!
     
  6. City of truro fan

    City of truro fan New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2015
    Messages:
    683
    Likes Received:
    81
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Honiton
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    They have frames built ages ago I’m not sure where they are kept
     
  7. David Humphreys

    David Humphreys Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2011
    Messages:
    87
    Likes Received:
    260
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Managing Director
    Location:
    Scarborough
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I am assuming you are referring to Blyth or indeed Hengist, not He gist. If it was Blyth, there was a set cut before we got involved, but they were not accurate. As with our recommendation for all new builds, start with the boiler, collect other finished bits, THEN order the frames for them all to be be fitted. When done, you have a rolling chassis which has cylinders fitted which can then have the motion added to enable it to run on air. Also proves the credibility of the scheme. This is the process we are completing with The Southwold Railway Trust and presently, we are finishing phase 3 and part way into phase 4.

    1863 Mountaineer Group are using the same approach and will be ordering cylinders and wheels plus other components before the chassis is cut.
     
    huochemi, jnc, ghost and 1 other person like this.
  8. Kinghambranch

    Kinghambranch Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2006
    Messages:
    1,845
    Likes Received:
    1,434
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    White Rose County
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Many thanks for the information and link regarding the Bloomer boiler.
     
  9. Hirn

    Hirn Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2015
    Messages:
    324
    Likes Received:
    206
    Gender:
    Male
    Bigger indeed: with a longer firebox and a longer barrel it became the boiler for the King.
    Either end of the firebox the the back plate and the throat plate are practically identical - the
    two the biggest pressings, the largest specialist parts, in the second biggest boiler Swindon
    ever made.

    The boiler proportions are more favourable than the King version: with the smaller grate the ratio of the free gas area through the tubes improves
    and the lesser resistance through a shorter tube bundle also helps.

    Very pleased indeed that the temption to put the original GWR standard 1 boiler was resisted - the No 1 boiler was tried, found wanting and recognised as that by Churchward himself. The 47xx with the No 7 Boiler, 30 sq ft grate area and all in proportion, was his mature and final masterpiece.

    I had better come clean, I think that not running new builds like this misses the point - you
    need twenty miles to warm up and settle down a locomotive and then after that you run it seriously, proceeding backwards with a handful of carriages at 25 mph max.......
    I can see how the temptation arises to cut corners to get something done -indeed I can understand it - but the result has been to fall between two stools: it may look like it but it
    cannot perform as it should and as it increasingly needs to.

    The 47xx would be a valuable locomotive on the main line - just what you need over the Devon
    banks, up to Savernake, Whiteball, Cockett, Sapperton, Hatton with what must now be commercially a large train. The arguments for it are the same as the P2.
     
    Last edited: Apr 15, 2020
    BrightonBaltic and MellishR like this.
  10. GWR4707

    GWR4707 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    14,339
    Likes Received:
    10,930
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cumbria
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Leaky Finders
     
  11. Jimc

    Jimc Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    3,304
    Likes Received:
    3,274
    Occupation:
    Once computers, now part time writer I suppose.
    Location:
    SE England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Except even in GWR/BR days they were limited to 60mph because they were inclined to nose about, so goodness knows what limit NR would put on one now. Presumably 50mph. The P2 is being significantly redesigned to try and deal with its design flaws, but its at least a 6ft2 locomotive. I really struggle to see much of a role for a 50mph heavily route limited locomotive, even if it can start a heavier train than anything else out there.
     
  12. marshall5

    marshall5 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2010
    Messages:
    1,834
    Likes Received:
    2,331
    Location:
    i.o.m
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Surely all this discussion of 4709's suitability, or otherwise, is irrelevant as ISTR that the GWS publicly stated that they have no future mainline aspirations.
    Ray.
     
    Jimc likes this.
  13. MellishR

    MellishR Part of the furniture Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Messages:
    5,975
    Likes Received:
    3,658
    Some of us are still muttering WIBN.
    The abandonment of main line plans is especially disappointing after more than one loco has been redesigned to better fit the modern loading gauge. If the will existed, 4709's pony truck could be redesigned like the P2's to improve the ride. And even if a new no. 7 boiler does not cost much more than a refurbished and disguised no. 1, it will surely cost somewhat more and be able to produce more steam than 4709 is ever likely to use on a preserved line at 25 mph.
     
    jnc and Paulthehitch like this.
  14. LesterBrown

    LesterBrown Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2009
    Messages:
    992
    Likes Received:
    758
    Location:
    Devon
    I recall reading that the ride problems with the 4700s was down to the side play of the coupled trailing axle rather than any issue with the pony truck.
     
  15. 242A1

    242A1 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,351
    Likes Received:
    975
    If they were really ever serious about running on the mainline then the design should have been run through Vampire if the building group were aware of deficiencies in the performance of the chassis. It looks like this was never considered. The P2 pony truck problem was known about and there were people at at Doncaster who understood this and recommended that it was changed. This change alone pretty well solves the chassis issues though the crank axle was another matter and the analysis tools to enable the improvement of this item were not available 70 years ago. To slavishly build a copy of a 100 year old design without due reference to the conditions of the current time can be seen as an act of folly. The P2 Trust have acted in awareness of the present times with an eye to the future, 4709 appears to be another matter.
     
    Last edited: Apr 15, 2020
    69530 likes this.
  16. ross

    ross Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2017
    Messages:
    869
    Likes Received:
    2,140
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Titfield
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Who could ever accuse my beloved GWR of fashionable modernism when reactionary conservatism worked just fine?
     
  17. 242A1

    242A1 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,351
    Likes Received:
    975
    And that is what appears to be the problem. It doesn't work 'just fine' unless the genuine original intention was to build a demonstrator that would serve to meet a very basic requiremen, say ambling along at 20-25 mph with 6 or 7 coaches, very far removed from what the type is supposed to be capable of.
    The A1 Trust built an engine which rewards those who invested in it with a standard of performance which illustrates rather well what the class was capable of. 4709 is never going to get the chance.
     
    clinker likes this.
  18. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    21,526
    Likes Received:
    40,674
    Location:
    215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    There are two sides to that coin though - mainline running may allow a locomotive to get closer to demonstrating its capabilities, but it enables that opportunity for a relatively small group of people. By contrast, far more people are able to experience, and appreciate, a loco "ambling along at 20 - 25mph with 6 or 7 coaches". A mainline loco might end up transporting few hundred people no more than a dozen or so times per year. A heritage line loco might do that three times per day for a hundred operating days every year.

    Don;t assume that somehow mainline running is inherently superior to runing on a heritage line - particularly for a loco built by a charity that will have education and access considerations for what it owns and operates. Heritage line running gives considerably better opportunities for widespread public access than running on the mainline does.

    Tom
     
    M Palmer, Jimc, LesterBrown and 11 others like this.
  19. andrewshimmin

    andrewshimmin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Messages:
    1,706
    Likes Received:
    2,050
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Which does rather raise the question of whether, of we're going to build new locos, be wouldn't be better choosing a design suited to this duty...
    Such as all the larger passenger tank/mixed traffic tank classes we're missing from the late pre-grouping, grouping and BR periods.
    There are of course the Standard 3 project and the Standard 2 project, which are both eminently sensible (and attractive locos).
    I know some groups have tank locos on their "later on" list such as the Fowler 4P 2-6-4T tank for the Patriot group, and the V3 for the A1ST (eventually, after building every tender loco Gresley ever thought of for a few minutes over a drink in the pub).
    There are also a couple of quiet groups working on e.g. the G5 and a GER 2-4-2T.
    Somehow, none of these get the exposure or prominence of the groups working on silly big locos which are essentially not well suited to the work actually out there to be done...

    Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk
     
    Monkey Magic, ross, jnc and 2 others like this.
  20. MellishR

    MellishR Part of the furniture Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Messages:
    5,975
    Likes Received:
    3,658
    I can't disagree with that, but being able to run both on the main line and on heritage lines would be better still. That's what Tornado does and what some of the other new builds will do.
     
    BrightonBaltic, ross and 240P15 like this.

Share This Page