If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Edward Thompson: Wartime C.M.E. Discussion

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by S.A.C. Martin, May 2, 2012.

  1. S.A.C. Martin

    S.A.C. Martin Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,591
    Likes Received:
    9,325
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Asset Engineer (Signalling), MNLPS Treasurer
    Location:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Why was that sarcastic comment necessary?

    For the record, all of my proof readers did a great job. I am very grateful for all of them.
     
  2. RalphW

    RalphW Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Administrator Friend

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2005
    Messages:
    35,446
    Likes Received:
    9,144
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired-ish, Part time rail tour steward.
    Location:
    Northwich
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I hope that Tom accepted the little dig and took it in the spirit it was intended, however, I'm sorry but if you didn't appreciate the significance of the :rolleyes: then I cannot help you.
     
  3. S.A.C. Martin

    S.A.C. Martin Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,591
    Likes Received:
    9,325
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Asset Engineer (Signalling), MNLPS Treasurer
    Location:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Just seems mean spirited, frankly. Do you have anything constructive to add?
     
    69530 and southyorkshireman like this.
  4. RalphW

    RalphW Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Administrator Friend

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2005
    Messages:
    35,446
    Likes Received:
    9,144
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired-ish, Part time rail tour steward.
    Location:
    Northwich
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    For pity's sake can't you understand it was said in jest?
     
  5. 62440

    62440 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2020
    Messages:
    143
    Likes Received:
    316
    Location:
    4A
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Deleted
     
    Last edited: Nov 27, 2021
  6. mdewell

    mdewell Well-Known Member Friend

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Messages:
    1,653
    Likes Received:
    2,564
    Occupation:
    UK & Ireland Heritage Railways Webmaster
    Location:
    Ruabon, Wrexham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Hi Simon

    I just finished reading your book and found it fascinating. I think many on here will know I am more of a GWR fan, and I confess to not knowing much more than the basics about LNER CMEs and rolling stock, so I wasn’t previously aware (apart from recent postings on NP) of any controversy about Thompson. Your book was therefore an education in many ways. Thank you.

    I certainly never realized that so many of the later LNER locos classes were rebuilds of older locos (and they say all GWR locos look the same. LNER ones really are! :eek:).

    PS. Will send you a few private comments later.
     
  7. 62440

    62440 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2020
    Messages:
    143
    Likes Received:
    316
    Location:
    4A
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer

    Likewise, I found it fascinating. I think the author has made an important contribution in correcting some of the nonsense that has accumulated around Thompson’s reputation. He has debunked some opinions out there that have been masquerading as facts.

    The book makes clear the problems besetting the LNER during WWII and that Thompson AND HIS TEAM came up with rational solutions within what was possible at the time. It also makes it clear that what the Thompson regime did was a continuation and development of Gresley’s work, most definitely NOT a repudiation of it.

    I would have liked to have seen more of the data the author draws upon but I understand the reasons why this has not been included.

    Overall, I think it’s well done and I applaud it.
     
  8. johnofwessex

    johnofwessex Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2015
    Messages:
    9,185
    Likes Received:
    7,226
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Thorn in my managers side
    Location:
    72
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    More to the point, it seems to me that it highlights how old the LNER loco fleet was with only 1000 out of 7000 being 'Gresley' designs by the time of WW2.

    I wonder what the figures were for the LMS & GWR - Post 1923 designs that is, not Gresley.

    There is also of course the question of why this was the case.
     
    62440 likes this.
  9. Enterprise

    Enterprise Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2005
    Messages:
    5,275
    Likes Received:
    3,077
    The LNER was broke! It had the worst financial position of any of the four groups.
    https://rchs.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/FINAL-Wilson-LNER_2.pdf
     
  10. johnofwessex

    johnofwessex Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2015
    Messages:
    9,185
    Likes Received:
    7,226
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Thorn in my managers side
    Location:
    72
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    S.A.C. Martin likes this.
  11. S.A.C. Martin

    S.A.C. Martin Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,591
    Likes Received:
    9,325
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Asset Engineer (Signalling), MNLPS Treasurer
    Location:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Surprised to see myself in there. I got cited - wonders will never cease!
     
  12. Jimc

    Jimc Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,052
    Likes Received:
    4,665
    Occupation:
    Once computers, now part time writer I suppose.
    Location:
    SE England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    It will be Wikipedia next...
     
    S.A.C. Martin likes this.
  13. flying scotsman123

    flying scotsman123 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    10,440
    Likes Received:
    17,940
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cheltenham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Having accidentally stumbled across it the other day, The Edward Thompson wiki page is in desperate need of some attention on both the content and sources side!...
     
    S.A.C. Martin likes this.
  14. johnofwessex

    johnofwessex Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2015
    Messages:
    9,185
    Likes Received:
    7,226
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Thorn in my managers side
    Location:
    72
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Two interesting tings from the book, firstly that the B17 design - and although it isnt stated, the B1 I gather as well, were designed by North British, not the LNER.

    Secondly both Gresley & Thompson were widowers, I know Peppercorn married Dorothy Maher but had be been married before?
     
  15. S.A.C. Martin

    S.A.C. Martin Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,591
    Likes Received:
    9,325
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Asset Engineer (Signalling), MNLPS Treasurer
    Location:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    No, the Thompson B1 was drawn out by Doncaster works. Some batches of B1s were built by NBL.

    That’s why in the book the distinction for the B17s is made - this was an outside contractor leading design, different from almost everything else.
     
  16. Fred Kerr

    Fred Kerr Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2006
    Messages:
    8,239
    Likes Received:
    5,250
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Freelance photo - journalist
    Location:
    Southport
    Interesting that the quoted reference STILL repeats the view of Thompson's "hatred" of Gresley :

    There were significant differences between Gresley and Edward Thompson, for example. Thompson held a number of mechanical engineering positions in Gresley’s department between the grouping and April 1941, when he was appointed Gresley’s successor as CME. They had not worked well together. Apart from differences in character, Thompson and Gresley disagreed on a number of issues.81 A significant difference was that of the Gresley conjugated (or derived) valve gear for three- cylinder engines. Another was standardisation and significantly when he became CME in 1941, Thompson started a much needed programme of standardisation.

    Given that managers (or CMEs) have different opinions of how to achieve the same result (i.e. keep locomotives available under wartime conditions) it is to be expected that different decisions will be taken at the pint when circumstances / the Management Board dictate. Sadly - to my mind - the repetition of the Gresley v Thompson hatred only weakens my acceptance of any other argument / discussion he forwards in his paper irrespective of how correct his assumptions are.
     
  17. mdewell

    mdewell Well-Known Member Friend

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Messages:
    1,653
    Likes Received:
    2,564
    Occupation:
    UK & Ireland Heritage Railways Webmaster
    Location:
    Ruabon, Wrexham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The only mention I can see of 'hatred' is your use of the word. 'Not worked well together' and 'disagreed on a number of issues' could be fair comment without necessarily leading to hatred. The same could occasionally have been applied in my own career but I and the colleagues concerned still respected each other.
     
    MellishR, Steve, Bluenosejohn and 5 others like this.
  18. S.A.C. Martin

    S.A.C. Martin Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,591
    Likes Received:
    9,325
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Asset Engineer (Signalling), MNLPS Treasurer
    Location:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The thing which bothers me is "had not worked well together". I accept there is something of a subjective view to this, but Thompson clearly responded well and did good work for Gresley whilst under him. Gresley will have thought whether he had his money's worth from Thompson - likely he did, otherwise Thompson wouldn't have come into the effective second in command role, as Mechanical Engineer at Doncaster.

    It's difficult sometimes to overcome the huge amount of subjective - shall we say - interference that seems to resonate out of the Thompson/Gresley story.
     
  19. Jimc

    Jimc Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,052
    Likes Received:
    4,665
    Occupation:
    Once computers, now part time writer I suppose.
    Location:
    SE England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Its also very vague language. What does "not worked well together" mean? And its not even, really, a criticism. There are always going to be people that don't establish a productive working relationship together for whatever reasons, and isn't part of the art of good management to utilise their skills without having them interacting negatively? I can recognise someone as competent without having to get on with them.

    Perhaps an extreme example is George Armstrong and William Dean on the GWR, both classic Victorian autocratic managers. In those days the GWR had two main works, at Swindon and Wolverhampton. Swindon had been the domain of the broad gauge, and Wolverhampton the narrow, but as the broad gauge diminished Swindon, always the chief works, became involved in both. To cut a genealogy short and simplify, Dean had once been junior to Armstrong at Wolverhampton, but moved to Swindon and was later promoted to Locomotive Superintendant (=CME), effectively over Armstrong's head. In practice, though, Armstrong was left to run Wolverhampton more or less independently, subject of course to the board, and Wolverhampton wasn't brought fully under Swindon control until Armstrong retired.
     
    MellishR and S.A.C. Martin like this.
  20. std tank

    std tank Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Messages:
    3,808
    Likes Received:
    946
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Liverpool
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I have a North British drawing for the Pipe and Rod of a B1. It has been traced from an original Doncaster drawing.
     
    S.A.C. Martin likes this.

Share This Page