Shame on David Wilcock for such an incompetent interview, and shame on Gary Boyd-Hope for publishing it in that form. It's an insult to Mr Davies and an insult to the magazine's readers. Wilcock always was a second-rate hack, and it's no surprise he's moved around the magazines as often as he has. The surprise is that editors keep taking him on. At the very least, he needs a firm editorial hand, but GBH has failed to reign him in. No decent journalist needs three multi-page episodes to tell the tale of the attempted closure of the S&C and it's reprieve. No decent journalist needs two episodes to interview the head of the NRM. No decent journalist would try to put himself at the centre of either story. On the up-side, it is plain to everyone now just how good a "journalist" DW actually is, so maybe it will hasten his overdue retirement.