If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Future max speed of heritage railways

Discussion in 'Heritage Railways & Centres in the UK' started by FredBert, Mar 29, 2016.

  1. FredBert

    FredBert New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2016
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    8
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Tröglitz
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Hollo together,
    I know that there are important reasons for the 25 miles per hour speed limit on heritage railways.
    But while having a look at future plans of the GCR, there would be use of increasing the speed limit of the regular steam trains on this reconnected line. With the increase of the speed, they could be truly become a full mainline heritage railway. Other trains on this line are allowed to reach the 60 mp/h, so why shouln't it made redundant on this particular railway. The tracks are of high quality and the operators are very experienced.
    There are also other heritage railway lines, e.g. the Gloucestershire Railway, who build the new railway tracks in high quality, so steam trains could possibly drive faster than on other railroads.

    Is a change in law for particular heritage railway possible?

    Thank you,
    Cheers
    Fred
     
  2. Martin Perry

    Martin Perry Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    16,510
    Likes Received:
    7,753
    Location:
    1012 / 60158
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    No change in the law required; the facility is already there, but the line would be regarded as and be subject to the same safety requirements as the main network.
     
    paulhitch likes this.
  3. Paul Kibbey

    Paul Kibbey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,165
    Likes Received:
    1,402
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Land of Sodor
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    So is it a total pipe dream ? To see something like Tornado , a Castle or an A4 crawling along at 25mph , IMHO is such a waste . Most herritage lines PW are in better condition than when BR abandoned them . I suppose footplate and train crew's training would have to be upgraded . I attended NYMR's Spring Gala last year and took a trip on the Whitby to Glaisdale line , it was thrilling to be travelling at the Big Railways line speed behind a steam loco .
    I can dream .
     
    Last edited: Mar 29, 2016
    Black Jim likes this.
  4. Martin Perry

    Martin Perry Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    16,510
    Likes Received:
    7,753
    Location:
    1012 / 60158
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Definitely :)
     
  5. Paul Kibbey

    Paul Kibbey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,165
    Likes Received:
    1,402
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Land of Sodor
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Pity .
     
  6. Martin Perry

    Martin Perry Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    16,510
    Likes Received:
    7,753
    Location:
    1012 / 60158
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Sorry I was being a little flippant; it would be quite feasible to have a heritage railway with higher speeds but all the derogations from safety requirements that come from having a 40kmh max speed would be lost, so TPWS, centralised locking, etc would be needed, plus acts of parliament to establish etc. Expensive.
     
  7. Pete Thornhill

    Pete Thornhill Resident of Nat Pres Staff Member Administrator Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Messages:
    7,498
    Likes Received:
    5,455
    Yes the NYMR can run at line speed on the Whitby section but usually limit their services to 25mph to avoid the associated red tape such has stewards at the doors as one example. Same would apply to any heritage line looking at more than 25mph as Martin says.
     
  8. 6024KEI

    6024KEI Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    860
    Likes Received:
    472
    Location:
    Bath
    To be honest the main beneficiaries of such a move would be the lineside video makers.

    For the paying punter you get a shorter ride and less enjoyment of the scenery - so would you still pay as much for the ticket (and I'm meaning Joe Public here who make up most of the customer base). For the enthusiast it probably still wouldn't be fast enough to draw them away from mainline charters (and if it did would that be good?)

    For the lines, the additional costs etc of maintaining track and stock in the face of the greater stresses of higher speed running isn't likely to be matched by higher incomes so why would they want to do it.

    Even then you'd need to pick your lines carefully - somewhere like the GCR would be reasonable to run at 60mph - some of the former branch lines might not.
     
    Paul42 and Hampshire Unit like this.
  9. Sawdust

    Sawdust Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2015
    Messages:
    508
    Likes Received:
    884
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    At more than 25 MPH, in addition to the things already mentioned, you would have to OTMR and possibly GSMR. You would also not be able to run passenger trains using screw coupled timber bodied stock to boot.

    Sawdust.
     
  10. Greenway

    Greenway Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2008
    Messages:
    3,906
    Likes Received:
    3,704
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    South Hams
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    It might be fine to run at higher speeds through uninteresting countryside but a good many Heritage/Tourist lines run in magnificent scenery. Bearing in mind most of the passengers on heritage lines are used to main line speeds on the national network, where most seem to be absorbed by mobile phones, tablets and other electronic apparatus, rather than scenery. And the others are used to car travel which again in congested areas or motorways gives little opportunity for 'sightseeing'.
     
  11. std tank

    std tank Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Messages:
    3,808
    Likes Received:
    946
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Liverpool
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    No chance of running at 60 mph through East Leake on the GCR.
     
  12. Steve

    Steve Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2006
    Messages:
    11,930
    Likes Received:
    10,088
    Occupation:
    Gentleman of leisure, nowadays
    Location:
    Near Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    It's been discussed previously on several occasions on Nat Pres. In essence, theee is nothing to stop any heritage railway from running a speeds higher than 25 mph. In reality, it is just not worth it. Modern legislation (largely driven by EU directives) creates a lot of hurdles that would have to be jumped. For example,but not limited to, the fitting of TPWS, a ban on slam door stock and licensing of drivers. The get out is that the movement has been able to negotiate exemptions to these requirements provided that the maximum speed is kept below 40 kmph (25 mph).
     
  13. martin1656

    martin1656 Nat Pres stalwart Friend

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2014
    Messages:
    17,609
    Likes Received:
    11,223
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    St Leonards
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Does the Light Railway Act no longer stand? that was the reason behind preserved railways having 25mph Speed limit that was what the law allowed, unless you had special permission from the then rail inspectorate to allow you to have a higher speed limit normally for DMU commuter trains, if you had desires to run a service.
    Now adays, there is no Inspectorate that has power to judge on individual case by case, if you want to run at 45, 50, 60 mph and carry far paying public, you have to meet the same requirements as the main line, some have dispenation to test at 60 mph, but thats with a non passenger carrying train solely for testing an overhauled engine that is undergoing a return to the main line. people may be getting confused between a line that has to observe a mandatory speed for its scheduled passenger services and tests that are ran with ECS as part of an engines post restoration / repair main line testing operation.
     
  14. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,103
    Likes Received:
    57,432
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Why would you want to? Since most visitors are there for an enjoyable ride, running at higher speed seems to be a way to add expense on the operating side while at the same time reducing the journey time - and therefore the perceived value - of the trip for visitors. Sounds like a lose-lose situation.

    Tom
     
  15. Adam-Box

    Adam-Box Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2015
    Messages:
    405
    Likes Received:
    84
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    South West
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I would agree with the fact that on most lines there is little/no advantage of running faster. However on lines like the WHR or WSR where the time is really on the edge of what people can tolerate a ten or twenty minute time saving would make the whole journey seem less daunting to non-enthusiasts who make up most of the railways market. And they may be more likely to visit.
     
  16. 61624

    61624 Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2006
    Messages:
    5,294
    Likes Received:
    3,596
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The longer lines, in particular, are trying to sell an all-day experience in order to make their fares appear comparable with other competing attractions. Most will be trying to persuade their passengers to break their journeys at an intermediate point - e.g. Grosmont or Goathland on the NYMR, Dunster or Watchet or Washford on the WSR. Getting between them at higher speed would not necessarily enhance their visit.
     
  17. Matt78

    Matt78 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2007
    Messages:
    1,637
    Likes Received:
    3,272
    Occupation:
    Solicitor
    Location:
    South Wales
    A Light Railway Order is a Statutory Instrument. Therefore it is enshrined in law. If any changes are to be made then this must be the subject of a new Transport and Works Order, I believe..
    It is no longer possible to create a new LRO, but many lines are subject to existing ones.



    regards

    Matt
     
  18. Martin Perry

    Martin Perry Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    16,510
    Likes Received:
    7,753
    Location:
    1012 / 60158
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Are you aware of complaints or people not visiting because of the journey time?
     
  19. TorbayTrains

    TorbayTrains Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2013
    Messages:
    207
    Likes Received:
    67
    Location:
    South Devon
    High speed runs would be good on gala days as long as the railways is suitable to it e.g. Not a twisty branch line. But everyday I don't think it would be worth it.

    The average for heritage railways tend to be around 1/2 hour long end to end, the one thing you don't want to do is shorten it while keeping the same costs. If you look at reviews on TripAdvisor most bad reviews of heritage railways come from the fact prices tend to be quite high. The last thing you want to do is reduce the time the customer is with you if this is already an issue. Then there's differences in engines, timetables would become a bit of a nightmare if you had to factor in engines with different speeds. Small tank engines and mainline cruisers wouldn't mix too well on a normal timetable day.

    It's a great idea but it will have to be executed properly and be worth doing! :)
     
    Just_Sayin and Paul Kibbey like this.
  20. LC2

    LC2 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2012
    Messages:
    845
    Likes Received:
    999
    Occupation:
    IT
    Location:
    70B
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    My kids...
    When we've been holidaying in deepest darkest ziderland my two are always very reluctant to go to the WSR due to the length of time spent on the train (not sure how this is different to me dragging them up and down a shorter line multiple times, but there it is).
     

Share This Page