If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Is it 35022 or 35027

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by Richardb, Aug 15, 2010.

  1. Richardb

    Richardb New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    Afternoon everybody.
    I was passing thro' Southall yesterday and saw the Merchant Navy. Question is was it 35022 or 35027. Frames had boiler attached and next to it cab sides with the number 35022. I thought the boiler for 35022 was at Crewe being worked on. Is it 35022 frames with 35027 boiler or what ? Please help . Thanks
     
  2. Matt35027

    Matt35027 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    1,122
    Likes Received:
    143
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Builder
    Location:
    Near 74D
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    That would be the remains of 35022. Only preliminary work has been done to 35027. Hopefully once 34046 and 70000 are finished then 35027 will get her turn.
     
  3. KentYeti

    KentYeti Guest

    Horrible to read of 35022, as "the remains of 35022".

    Lovely run behind her on 23rd July 1964 on the down ACE. Fred Hoare driving, Peter Allen firing. 73 minutes net to Salisbury, (schedule 80 mins for 83.7 miles). Just under 70 over MP 31, over 90 through Andover, 70 over Grateley. As well as a number of other very good runs with her.
     
  4. Stewie Griffin

    Stewie Griffin Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2009
    Messages:
    398
    Likes Received:
    5
    I know of at least 1 Bournemouth engineman who, when asked by the then fledgling MNLPS which one was the best, told them it was 35022.
     
  5. nickt

    nickt Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2009
    Messages:
    489
    Likes Received:
    259
    Gender:
    Male
    And she hauled the last down "fast" ACE on 4th September 1964.

    http://nick301.photos.us.com/c1225803.html
     
  6. Richardb

    Richardb New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sorry Kent Yeti. Most inappropriate comment. Must think a little bit harder before I type.
    Richard
     
  7. KentYeti

    KentYeti Guest

    Richard, nothing at all wrong with your comment!

    But some of us go all misty eyed when Merchant Navy's get talked about.
     
  8. KentYeti

    KentYeti Guest

  9. KentYeti

    KentYeti Guest

    35028 had put up some superb performances and was also a very good choice. I'd have preferred 35003 as she was consistently a very free running and very fast loco. But having been on the footplate of Royal Mail that first night of the "Burridge Week" in June 1967 at 106 mph of course I'd say that wouldn't I! LOL!
     
  10. nickt

    nickt Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2009
    Messages:
    489
    Likes Received:
    259
    Gender:
    Male
    Is it Driver Sibley is this photo? http://nick301.photos.us.com/p39225983.html In my caption I refer to him as a Nine Elms driver (he drove the ACE from Waterloo to Salisbury that day), but I have subsequently read that Salisbury drivers crewed the down ACE, having come up to London on an early train. Which depot did Driver Sibley work from?

    Any idea who drove from Salisbury to Exeter? As I recall the train was eased after Crewkerne, and didn't break any records that day.
     
  11. Ben Jervis

    Ben Jervis Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2008
    Messages:
    338
    Likes Received:
    2
    The frames, wheels and cab etc belong to 35022. The boiler is 35027s, which has been swapped with 35022's for the time being as 35022's is in better condition.
     

Share This Page