If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Lynton and Barnstaple - Operations and Development

本贴由 50044 Exeter2009-12-25 发布. 版块名称: Narrow Gauge Railways

  1. pmh_74

    pmh_74 Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2009-01-28
    帖子:
    2,454
    支持:
    1,758
    Surely this is primarily about securing planning permission in perpetuity by making a start? Actually running trains still requires the T&WAO, so if there’s any worry about that then all talk of operating to this station or that station is premature. Of course, even if the unmentionable powers are granted, this would give them the option of continuing to negotiate (and fundraise) at relative leisure as well; but it seems equally feasible, once PP is secured and assuming T&WAO and all land in place, to merge the 3 stages again, if that becomes the thing to do. The point I’m making is that the PP isn’t going to insist on the duration between opening the phases, is it? They could open 5 minutes apart.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
    已获得H Cloutt的支持.
  2. RailWest

    RailWest Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2011-12-07
    帖子:
    4,128
    支持:
    8,061
    性别:
    所在地:
    West Country
    BUT...if you read the (detailed) article in the latest Magazine, AIUI it was made quite clear that a TWAO was not needed for the stretch from KL to Parracombe. Don't ask me to explain why, not my field of expertise....
     
    已获得H ClouttSnail368的支持.
  3. pmh_74

    pmh_74 Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2009-01-28
    帖子:
    2,454
    支持:
    1,758
    Well, you’re assuming I have said magazine; I’m not a member, merely an interested observer.

    It was always my understanding that a T&WAO was needed to cross a road. But actually, reading the government guidance seems to suggest that things are rather woolier than that. I daresay they will have taken legal advice and know what they are talking about.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
    已获得H Cloutt的支持.
  4. Snail368

    Snail368 New Member

    注册日期:
    2013-04-27
    帖子:
    86
    支持:
    145
    性别:
    职业:
    Invasive weed control and eradication
    所在地:
    Daventry, Northamptonshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I am no legal eagle, however as I understand it as North Devon Council will adopt the road bridge over Killington Lane a TWAO will not be required.
     
    已获得H Cloutt的支持.
  5. H Cloutt

    H Cloutt Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2018-12-22
    帖子:
    1,042
    支持:
    1,510
    性别:
    所在地:
    Battle
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    That is my understanding as well.
     
  6. JMJR1000

    JMJR1000 Member

    注册日期:
    2009-07-27
    帖子:
    845
    支持:
    706
    性别:
    所在地:
    Cleethorpes
    I have to concede you got me there, definitely not one of my most well thought out ideas there in retrospect, apologies.

    Interesting fact to learn, I'm assuming this agreement has been made under the condition the railway pays fully for the cost of the bridge's construction?
     
    已获得H Cloutt的支持.
  7. Axe +1

    Axe +1 New Member

    注册日期:
    2017-09-16
    帖子:
    194
    支持:
    771
    职业:
    Retired {Electronics Engineer}
    所在地:
    Surrey
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Brian and Harold, you are almost correct. The matter has nothing to do with North Devon Council.

    When completed, Bridge 65 will carry a public highway over the Railway and it will therefore be adopted by DEVON COUNTY COUNCIL as a highways structure. A legal agreement will be drawn up between the Trust and Devon County Council to enable the County Council to assume ownership and maintenance responsibility in perpetuity.

    As stated within the Lynton & Barnstaple Railway Magazine (issue 126), page 12, paragraph 6.
     
  8. H Cloutt

    H Cloutt Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2018-12-22
    帖子:
    1,042
    支持:
    1,510
    性别:
    所在地:
    Battle
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Hi Chris - thanks for clarifying. I really should have checked my magazine before posting! Bridge 65 isn't in the North Devon Council area anyway.
     
    已获得Snail368的支持.
  9. Steve

    Steve Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    注册日期:
    2006-10-07
    帖子:
    12,840
    支持:
    12,060
    职业:
    Gentleman of leisure, nowadays
    所在地:
    Near Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    You are probably correct in saying that a TWAO is not required if you own the land or lease it. However, without one, I doubt that you have the legal right to cross a public highway (which includes footpaths) either on the level, over or under. I'm not sure that a local council can give you that right, either. Way above my pay grade, though.
     
    已获得2392的支持.
  10. pmh_74

    pmh_74 Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2009-01-28
    帖子:
    2,454
    支持:
    1,758
    That was my assumption too, but as I already noted the government guidance (available online) is really not at all clear on that. I suspect it's more about getting powers for road closures for construction (and maybe future maintenance), than actually carrying passengers across a road, but like you I'm no legal expert!
    I'm aware of another railway which reopened under an existing road-over-rail bridge without a T&WAO but I always assumed it to be some historical anomaly; perhaps not.
     
  11. Flying Phil

    Flying Phil Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2018-12-10
    帖子:
    3,054
    支持:
    6,486
    性别:
    所在地:
    Leicestershire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I note from the latest L & B Newsletter (No 75) that the number of volunteer hours in 2021....despite Covid, was 42,000. That is a true tribute to all concerned with the reawakened L & B.
     
    已获得beavis, Hampshire Unit, green five另外6人的支持.
  12. RailWest

    RailWest Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2011-12-07
    帖子:
    4,128
    支持:
    8,061
    性别:
    所在地:
    West Country
    I suspect that the true numbers will be much higher, once you take into account all those WFH in various forms on pro-L&BR activities which are not formally 'logged' in any way. I understand there is an intention to remedy this in due course where possible. That is not to detract in any way from the splendid 'effort so far'.
     
    已获得mgp的支持.
  13. Michael B

    Michael B Member

    注册日期:
    2020-11-12
    帖子:
    545
    支持:
    1,429
    性别:
    所在地:
    Bristol
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Chris - WFH is not in my OED - can you enlighten an ignorant peasant who has not been on the training course please ?
     
  14. Tobbes

    Tobbes Member

    注册日期:
    2010-08-14
    帖子:
    996
    支持:
    2,928
    Work From Home
     
  15. RailWest

    RailWest Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2011-12-07
    帖子:
    4,128
    支持:
    8,061
    性别:
    所在地:
    West Country
    ...or, perhaps more accurately in this context, working anywhere other than actually on or near the railway :)
     
  16. Flying Phil

    Flying Phil Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2018-12-10
    帖子:
    3,054
    支持:
    6,486
    性别:
    所在地:
    Leicestershire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The item in the newsletter does say that 70% is actually spent at various locations on the railway, the other 30% is spent at area groups, shows and events, work on the extension etc. But I agree there is a huge amount of background work being done by many dedicated people - who all deserve our thanks.
     
    已获得BiermeisterOld Kent Bikerweltrol的支持.
  17. Musket The Dog

    Musket The Dog Member

    注册日期:
    2022-01-05
    帖子:
    202
    支持:
    478
    性别:
    职业:
    Mechanical Engineer
    所在地:
    Leicestershire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    A little bit late to the party on this one, but if you were parked in a way that was physically blocking the road i.e. preventing access past your vehicle to something large and rural like a tractor, you would be liable to pay whatever fine/charge the police see fit if they decided to act upon the complaint and move it somewhere else.

    There's not a lot the railway can do if people are determined to park at Parracombe other than try their best to persuade people not to. Unfortunately though I would bet that the sort of person daft enough to park up and block the road, would also direct some of their frustration back at the railway if they came back to their car to find it had been moved and they had been fined for it.
     
    Last edited: 2022-02-28
  18. johnofwessex

    johnofwessex Resident of Nat Pres

    注册日期:
    2015-04-06
    帖子:
    9,814
    支持:
    7,964
    性别:
    职业:
    Thorn in my managers side
    所在地:
    72
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Basically you can be towed away and there is a charge for releasing the vehicle
     
  19. Tobbes

    Tobbes Member

    注册日期:
    2010-08-14
    帖子:
    996
    支持:
    2,928
    Do we know when the request to vary the planning permission goes in? Has the railway said?
     
  20. H Cloutt

    H Cloutt Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2018-12-22
    帖子:
    1,042
    支持:
    1,510
    性别:
    所在地:
    Battle
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I checked the ENPA website a day or so ago and nothing is shown, I suspect that the documents are still being prepared to reflect comments made in response to the Public consultation. I assume that the railway will let us know when it is submitted.
     
    已获得Tobbes的支持.

分享此页面