If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

PLCs 'controlled' by Trusts

Тема в разделе 'Heritage Railways & Centres in the UK', создана пользователем D1039, 1 май 2016.

  1. D1039

    D1039 Guest

    This is a spin off from the WSRA thread

    As I recall the Blubell's charity has a majority (c. 70%) stake in the Bluebell PLC and the David Clarke Trust has a big stake in the Great Central.

    The SVR Charitable Trust has just a small shareholding in the PLC but the members (The 'Guarantee Company') have a significant c. 25% stake

    What are the models for other lines?

    Cheers

    Patrick
     
  2. 61624

    61624 Part of the furniture

    Дата регистрации:
    27 сен 2006
    Сообщения:
    5.294
    Симпатии:
    3.599
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The NYMHRT has a controlling stake in NYMR Plc. I'm pretty sure that the Mid Hants RPS has control of its associated PLC, too, though I stand to be corrected, and I imagine that if ther'es a PLC operating the Bo'ness line the SRPS will have control of that! So effectively, that's all most of the major lines having this form of structure.
     
  3. flying scotsman123

    flying scotsman123 Resident of Nat Pres

    Дата регистрации:
    9 сен 2013
    Сообщения:
    10.674
    Симпатии:
    18.700
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    Cheltenham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The GWSR trust has a large, but I believe not a majority shareholding in our Plc. With this and a few cross-board directors thrown in, it allows the trust to donate large sums of money to the Plc for specific projects to further the trust's charitable aims; last year I believe the sum was circa £190,000.
     
    jimclarke989 нравится это.
  4. huochemi

    huochemi Part of the furniture

    Дата регистрации:
    6 май 2008
    Сообщения:
    3.001
    Симпатии:
    1.521
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    UK
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Trusts are a particular legal creation, and some companies limited by guarantee (e.g. the NYMHRT) are called trusts in their title but are not trusts in a legal sense like the DCRT or the owner of the Festiniog Railway Co shares. The way you have phrased the heading/question also does not take account of a particular line's structure, as it assumes the plc is the railway. So for instance, to cite the NYMR again, the "railway" there is essentially owned by the NYMHRT and the plc has quite a narrow asset-lite commercial role.
    FYI, according to its accounts, control of the Bluebell Railway PLC vests in the BRPS.

    Setting aside the issue of third parties acquiring the railway, and historical factors which generally have a major impact on a railway's ownership structure, as has been discussed ad nauseam on the WSRA thread, there seem to be advantages in having several types of entity involved: e.g. charity for tax efficient handling of donations/legacies, a plc to take advantage of EIS / access to a different pot of cash, and an unincorporated society as a membership body to avoid the constraints of the Companies Act (e.g. enabling disenfranchisement of the remote members, which would have solved the WSRA voting problems).
     
  5. D1039

    D1039 Guest

    Thanks, yes point taken on the
    Otherwise I'd deliberately left the question open to see what models railways had.

    Cheers

    Patrick
     
  6. David R

    David R Well-Known Member

    Дата регистрации:
    30 июл 2013
    Сообщения:
    1.019
    Симпатии:
    1.390
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    Surrey
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The Bluebell Railway Preservation Society (an unicorporated members body) holds about a 75% shareholding in Bluebell Railway PLC. There is a separate charitable trust - the Bluebell Railway Trust which has no members but exists for educational and charitable purposes related to railways.

    David R
     
    Jamessquared нравится это.
  7. Gav106

    Gav106 Well-Known Member

    Дата регистрации:
    29 мар 2010
    Сообщения:
    1.772
    Симпатии:
    2.170
    Адрес:
    Nantwich, Cheshire
    Technically I think Dumbleton Hall loco group actually owns 75% of the South Devon railway shareholdings. Not that they ever exercise the right to interfere.
     
  8. Matt78

    Matt78 Well-Known Member

    Дата регистрации:
    27 июн 2007
    Сообщения:
    1.730
    Симпатии:
    3.866
    Род занятий:
    Solicitor
    Адрес:
    South Wales
    Many railways that came into being in the late 70's/early 80's have a Company as the operator, and holder of the ownership of the land whether freehold or by way of lease. I have been told that this was because at the time, applications for Light Railway Orders to the Ministry of Transport were looked upon more favourably if the applicant was a limited Company. Examples include the GWSR, Llangollen, Gwili, there may be others.

    Some are limited by shares and some by guarantee; the latter lends itself to charitable status and the former does not although some Companies have become PLC's to aid expansion plans.

    Regards

    Matt
     
  9. huochemi

    huochemi Part of the furniture

    Дата регистрации:
    6 май 2008
    Сообщения:
    3.001
    Симпатии:
    1.521
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    UK
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I would be surprised if there are any railways which do not own or lease the track bed through a limited company. Do you have any examples in mind?
     
  10. flying scotsman123

    flying scotsman123 Resident of Nat Pres

    Дата регистрации:
    9 сен 2013
    Сообщения:
    10.674
    Симпатии:
    18.700
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    Cheltenham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    GWSR was a Ltd but became a Plc around 2011 IIRC; a bit before my time.
     
  11. huochemi

    huochemi Part of the furniture

    Дата регистрации:
    6 май 2008
    Сообщения:
    3.001
    Симпатии:
    1.521
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    UK
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    The "l" in Plc stands for limited but I am not sure if your post was in response to mine.
     
  12. flying scotsman123

    flying scotsman123 Resident of Nat Pres

    Дата регистрации:
    9 сен 2013
    Сообщения:
    10.674
    Симпатии:
    18.700
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    Cheltenham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I don't know a huge amount about these things merely noting the fact as an example.
     
  13. Matt78

    Matt78 Well-Known Member

    Дата регистрации:
    27 июн 2007
    Сообщения:
    1.730
    Симпатии:
    3.866
    Род занятий:
    Solicitor
    Адрес:
    South Wales
    can't think of any....probably because a company is the best organisation to hold a LRO/TWO with all the attendant legal rights and responsibilities.
     
  14. Miff

    Miff Part of the furniture Friend

    Дата регистрации:
    17 июн 2008
    Сообщения:
    3.004
    Симпатии:
    3.024
    K&ESR; IoWSR and W&LLR are all owned and operated by 'limited by guarantee' companies which have charitable status. These companies, which have no shareholders, are also the main membership bodies. In effect the railway is owned and operated by the membership collectively, and regulated by charity law.

    Separate companies are not needed to hold the operating powers and run the trains since the charitable objectives include both owning the railway and operating trains. Wholly owned subsidiary companies may be used to run any non-charitable trading activities, e.g. catering and shops, with the profits donated to the owning charity.
     
    Last edited: 3 май 2016
    cav1975 и paulhitch нравится это.
  15. Mogul

    Mogul Member

    Дата регистрации:
    2 фев 2016
    Сообщения:
    324
    Симпатии:
    687
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    Dorset
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Swanage Railway comprises The Swanage Railway Trust (SRT) and Swanage Railway Company (SRC).

    SRT is a registered charity and the membership body. It owns some rolling stock and 100% of the voting shares in the SRC.
    SRC is the Operating and Trading subsidiary company which holds the track bed lease, LRO/TWO and operates the railway. It also owns some rolling stock. There are other private shareholders in SRC but shares have never been publicly offered.
     
  16. 21B

    21B Part of the furniture

    Дата регистрации:
    2 сен 2009
    Сообщения:
    3.902
    Симпатии:
    8.686
    MHRPS owns around 1/2 the shares in MHR Ltd. It is by far the largest shareholder. MHR Ltd was a PLC, but ceased to be so some years ago on grounds of saving the costs of being a PLC.
     
  17. Miff

    Miff Part of the furniture Friend

    Дата регистрации:
    17 июн 2008
    Сообщения:
    3.004
    Симпатии:
    3.024
    Who (or what kind of ownership) owns the rest?
     
  18. andrewtoplis

    andrewtoplis Well-Known Member

    Дата регистрации:
    28 мар 2006
    Сообщения:
    1.419
    Симпатии:
    878
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Is there something about the ownership of assets being deliberately kept separate from the charitable body?

    I think there is also something about making sure that a controlling share is always kept thus insuring against 'hostile takeover' of the company that owns the asset?

    Sorry for the confusing post, this is not my area of expertise!
     
    Last edited: 4 май 2016
  19. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Дата регистрации:
    8 мар 2008
    Сообщения:
    27.803
    Симпатии:
    64.496
    Адрес:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I think in an ideal world, you would want the assets deliberately kept separate from the operating body. I can't see an issue with using a charitable body to hold the strategic assets, provided that charitable body is not itself exposed to a significant level of financial risk (which in practice means, keeping the fixed overheads as low as possible).

    As I see it, in a preserved railway, it is the operating body that bears the significant financial risk, since - once they publish their timetable for the year - they commit to a certain level of expenditure without necessarily knowing whether sufficient passengers will turn up to cover the costs. That is unavoidable, but an inherent financial risk.

    On the other hand, the assets typically derive their value on account of considerable volunteer input, to the extent that the replacement cost of an overhauled locomotive or carriage or station building - even if replacement were possible - would typically be way in excess of the figure on the balance sheet.

    Given those two propositions, it feels sensible to me to structure in a way that protects the assets in the event of financial problems from the riskiest part of the business, which is the operator. in addition, it feels sensible to limit the unavoidable financial risk to a single body - one of the problems, as I see it, in the WSR set up (to bring this back to the OP) being that both the PLC and the Association have considerable fixed overheads and therefore ended up competing for revenue streams.

    Tom
     
  20. D1039

    D1039 Guest

    I didn't want in the OP to re-run the WSR debates, rather to look at models on different preserved railways.

    It seems several have an operating arm with a significant member or charity shareholding but it's not universal the freehold is held by the members/charity. In some the members/charity both owns and operates the railway.

    Thank you

    Patrick
     

Поделиться этой страницей