If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Railfest 2012: the little loco that gave a vicar “barbarous treatment”

Discussion in 'National Railway Museum' started by National Railway Museum, Feb 1, 2012.

  1. National Railway Museum

    National Railway Museum New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2010
    Messages:
    145
    Likes Received:
    2
    [​IMG]This is one of a series of blog posts we’ll be bringing you in the run-up to our huge 9-day Railfest 2012 festival in June 2012. More blog posts about Railfest 2012
    [HR][/HR] I’m Sarah Fellows, an Assistant Interpretation Developer. I am currently researching the vehicles which will be coming here for Railfest 2012*in June. I have been in contact with many different heritage railways and museums to get as much information as possible about each vehicle.
    Recently, the curator at The Colonel Stephens Railway Museum in Kent sent me some lovely photographs of Shropshire & Montgomeryshire Railway Gazelle.
    Gazelle is thought to be the smallest standard gauge steam engine in the UK. It was built by Alfred Dodman & Co of King’s Lynn in 1893 for local businessman William Burkett.
    [​IMG]Gazelle in 1911

    This little locomotive has led a very eventful life. As well as taking William Burkett on*the occasional private excursion, Gazelle contributed to the war effort after it was bought by the War Department in 1941 and used to move ammunition.
    In 1947 a member of 161 Railway Construction Company was surprised to find Gazelle hidden under a pile of corrugated sheets. The soldier who found the locomotive later said.
    “I just couldn’t believe it when I first saw her very dirty etc, more like a toy than a small engine”.
    One of my own favorite stories from Gazelle’s past concerns Reverend Brock, Vicar of Criggion,*who took a trip on the Shropshire & Montgomeryshire Railway from Shrewsbury to Criggion in 1912.
    He later wrote a letter of complaint to the Board of Trade in which he made his feelings about riding behind Gazelle very clear.
    Preceding to the branch to Criggion*I was put with another man and two women into the back part of an engine with only a screen between us and the fire -*no roof and the sparks and smuts falling over us -*one spark nearly got in my eye -*with danger of being blinded – my clothes too injured by the same.”
    [​IMG]Gazelle in early 1911, shortly before Rev Brock took his eventful journey.

    The Reverend continues…
    “I have occasion to use the Rly for my wife and daughter and friends from London and of course I cannot subject them to such risk and barbarous treatment”.
    Gazelle was fitted with a cab shortly after this which would have provided passengers with some protection from the elements. In 1915 or 1916 Gazelle finally got a carriage in the form of a modified horse tram which can be seen in the photograph below, taken in 1926.
    [​IMG]All photographs are courtesy of Colonel Stephens Railway Museum Collection.

    Filed under: Railfest 2012, Research Tagged: Gazelle, The Colonel Stephens Railway Museum [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]
     
  2. andrewtoplis

    andrewtoplis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    1,419
    Likes Received:
    878
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Wow, I want one for my journey to work! No more fighting to get a seat for me - now I'll go in style....

    Does anyone know when (or why) it was converted from a 2-2-2 single to an 0-4-2 four-coupled loco (as seen in the last picture)?
     
  3. Robert Heath No.6

    Robert Heath No.6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2009
    Messages:
    1,535
    Likes Received:
    115
    I should imagine it'd give crew (and passengers?) a better ride in the latter formation (admittedly I've never travelled on or behind a single, but I'm guessing!), though I doubt that would have been reason enough for those in charge to approve the change!
     

Share This Page