If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

S&D Railway Trust

Discussion in 'Heritage Railways & Centres in the UK' started by Andy Norman, Feb 24, 2020.

  1. Andy Moody

    Andy Moody Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2007
    Messages:
    496
    Likes Received:
    337
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    71B ex 71A
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I am still trying to work out what the connection with the Whitaker token exchange apparatus and the travelling Royal Mail post office trains are?
    Both are completely different.
     
  2. goldfish

    goldfish Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2009
    Messages:
    14,900
    Likes Received:
    12,241
    As a relative little'un at the time, it was absolutely bloody spectacular to watch. I'm sure that if you'd told me at the time it was getting up to 80mph I'd have believed you, even though the more educated and older me knows that that would probably have been a bit tricky in the space available! ;)

    Simon
     
  3. goldfish

    goldfish Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2009
    Messages:
    14,900
    Likes Received:
    12,241
    I don't think there was anything beyond the speed of transfer. I will happily shut up about Mail trains now.

    Simon
     
  4. free2grice

    free2grice Part of the furniture Friend

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Messages:
    5,283
    Likes Received:
    2,650
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired Rolls-Royce engineer
    Location:
    Bath Green Park / Mangotsfield
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    2 simple questions.

    1. Have you forgotten that the S&D Trust have recently been evicted from the Washford site?
    2. Are you expecting the team to regularly keep the station in pristine condition as before the eviction?

    <BJ>
     
    jnc likes this.
  5. RailWest

    RailWest Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    3,803
    Likes Received:
    7,439
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    West Country
    I think it was simply the case that both were process which involved automatic train-to-land transfer at speed.
     
    jnc likes this.
  6. John Palmer

    John Palmer New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    115
    Likes Received:
    678
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Stephen Townroe has recorded that, on takeover by Western Region of the northern part of the S&D in 1950, the WR civil engineer announced an intention of replacing the Midford apparatus with one of GWR design. The meeting he convened at Midford to discuss such a change was soon over when he was enlightened as to the continuing use of other S&D exchangers outwith the regional boundary, a fact of which he had evidently been unaware!

    It may be worth mentioning that at at any passing place with a single line section on both sides, a meet would (almost) inevitably involve the crossing trains approaching the passing loop with both home signals guarding the loop at danger, and that surrender of the token for each of the single line sections involved would be followed by a request to withdraw a fresh tablet for the section just vacated*. It seems likely that in the case of such a meet the Whitaker apparatus would play no part, the tablets being passed by hand between signalman and traincrew. This, of course, was an opportunity for error, and there was at least one occasion when the the Shillingstone signalman, having drawn tablets for both the Shillingstone-Sturminster and Shillingstone-Blandford sections, gave the Blandford tablet to the train to Sturminster and the Sturminster tab to that destined for Blandford. Fortunately, there was a series of pop whistles as the Sturminster-bound train came to a stand at the Up Starting signal, and the fireman was to be seen waving the tablet pouch aloft as he raced back towards the box, having correctly ascertained that he was not in possession of a tablet for the section he was entering. One would hope that the Blandford-bound crew would likewise have discovered the error, but in any event it was one discovered and corrected before the Blandford train's departure and the need of a report to Authority avoided.

    <edit>* As already explained by @RailWest at https://www.national-preservation.c...eviction-notice.1417790/page-186#post-2669793, posted whilst I was writing the above </edit>
     
    Last edited: Jun 14, 2021
    Bluenosejohn and jnc like this.
  7. John Palmer

    John Palmer New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    115
    Likes Received:
    678
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I would like to record my thanks and congratulations to the team of S&DRT members who have successfully accomplished the dismantling and safe storage of the replica interior of the box at Midford hitherto housed within the Washford signal box. Dismembering and extracting that lever frame can scarcely have been an easy task.

    It would seem that the endgame at Washford is its restoration to a condition not unlike that in which it was found when the S&DRMT moved onto the site in 1975-76. If that state of affairs was one the West Somerset Railway plc did not desire then it should have honoured its obligations under the agreement it formed with the S&DRT in 2018; the present outcome is one for which it has only itself to blame.
     
  8. Maunsell907

    Maunsell907 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2013
    Messages:
    881
    Likes Received:
    1,965
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I am sad to see the S&D go, I wish them all the very best. I remember posting the above some
    15 months past.


    I recall at the time ‘Magic monkey’ afforded it ‘hatchet job’ status. It was no such thing, merely an
    attempt to be objective.

    Michael Rowe
     
  9. granmaree

    granmaree Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2015
    Messages:
    541
    Likes Received:
    497
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    However I was very dissapointed that when we were preparing with the various stations for the
    Flying Scotsman visit in 2017 the S&D Trust were unable to join in. Indeed the Station other
    than the platform remained unopened during the event. We used Plc volunteers to patrol the
    platform, specifically against line trespass. All the other WSR stations engaged enthusiastically
    in the event, in some cases arranging additional car parking nearby, extra food and drink
    facilities and most important all the requisite safety facilities ( including individual station plans )
    essential for the overall
    event plan.

    I was at Washford on two of the days of the FS event. They were open on both of those days and serving tea and coffee. Additional parking had been arranged with the Washford Inn. The station was patrolled by 2 security men that had been drafted in for the event by the plc. The plc staff were in attendance purely to collect the admission fee and issue a platform ticket.
     
    Last edited: Jun 14, 2021
    Kempenfelt 82e likes this.
  10. Matt37401

    Matt37401 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2014
    Messages:
    15,327
    Likes Received:
    11,665
    Occupation:
    Nosy aren’t you?
    Location:
    Nowhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    What ever you might think of the S&DRT trust it is not their fault about the appearance of Washford station, and not their fault another party reneged on the the deal.
     
    Last edited: Jun 14, 2021
    Dennis John Brooks and ghost like this.
  11. flying scotsman123

    flying scotsman123 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    10,440
    Likes Received:
    17,940
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cheltenham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I'm still not convinced that's particularly helpful, deepening factional divisions like that. It wasn't "The Plc" any more or less than it was "The WSR". If you want to ascribe it to the then plc board then that's fine, but lots of people on the WSR seem to get 'categorised', and then dismissed, as "Oh he's a Plc man he would say that" or similar with WSRA or WSRHT or whatever, which has always seemed deeply damaging to me. As if being "Pro-Plc" is different, or even worse, opposite, to being "Pro-WSRA". Drawing those lines in the way that they are makes it very difficult to move on, compared to other lines that have had difficulties in the past around divisive personalities. Even if people change, the lines stay the same on the WSR. That's why I think changing the organisational structure is so important and could bring about meaningful change, as it would break those long-standing divisions.
     
    MellishR, ikcdab and jnc like this.
  12. bluetrain

    bluetrain Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2019
    Messages:
    1,326
    Likes Received:
    1,460
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Wiltshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Assuming that the S&DRT removes all its vehicles and movable artifacts from Washford, that leaves the workshop shed and tracks. I suppose the options there are:
    - Sell them to the WSR.
    - Dismantle and sell for scrap.
    - Dismantle and transport for re-use elsewhere.

    But presumably a significant proportion of S&DRT members and volunteers reside in the West Somerset area, so may prefer the S&DRT to keep a presence in the area, even if on a much reduced scale?
     
  13. Matt37401

    Matt37401 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2014
    Messages:
    15,327
    Likes Received:
    11,665
    Occupation:
    Nosy aren’t you?
    Location:
    Nowhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Edited for you Alex.
     
    flying scotsman123 likes this.
  14. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    25,490
    Likes Received:
    23,720
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    While I agree with the sentiment, and the need to remove badges for people, I also think it wrong to detach association from the organisations that made the decisions. The blunt truth is that it was the plc, under the board of directors in office in early 2020, that gave the S&DRT notice to quit. It is that body that exercised itself in that way, and it is the consequences of the exercise of that power that were of concern before this happened, and continue to be of concern. The disease does not lie in any individual at the WSR, though the symptoms may be strong in some, but in the structure of the organisations as a whole. And without proper diagnosis, healing cannot commence.
     
    johnofwessex and jnc like this.
  15. jnc

    jnc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2012
    Messages:
    1,511
    Likes Received:
    2,706
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Western Atlantic
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I'm unable to tell what you changed. Any chance you could edit your post (perhaps with 'bold' flags) to make it clear? Thanks.

    Noel
     
  16. flying scotsman123

    flying scotsman123 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    10,440
    Likes Received:
    17,940
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cheltenham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Agreed, it's a tricky one, but I do firmly believe that everyone involved in the WSR being seen to have an "allegiance" to one pan-railway organisation or another to the extent that they therefore must be anti another pan railway organisation is extremely damaging long term, and anything that entrenches that should be avoided.
     
  17. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    25,490
    Likes Received:
    23,720
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I agree with that entirely.
     
    flying scotsman123 likes this.
  18. martin1656

    martin1656 Nat Pres stalwart Friend

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2014
    Messages:
    17,609
    Likes Received:
    11,222
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    St Leonards
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Especially when that anti the others feeling becomes so entrenched that one side would rather see the railway closed and derelict, than allow the other side to have a go at running what they perceive as " their railway" there are no winners, everyone loses, Lets assume the present management does succeed in running the railway into the ground, there can be no knight on their white charger galloping to the rescue, to pick up the pieces, it will be totally lost.
     
  19. Matt37401

    Matt37401 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2014
    Messages:
    15,327
    Likes Received:
    11,665
    Occupation:
    Nosy aren’t you?
    Location:
    Nowhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I’ll message you if that’s ok Noel
     
  20. Monkey Magic

    Monkey Magic Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2018
    Messages:
    3,498
    Likes Received:
    6,845
    Location:
    Here, there, everywhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    My five year old self is telling you that it was easily 80 MPH

    On the other hand using the term WSR means that some interpret criticism as being criticism of the whole entity and everyone in it. Many people had no say in the initial decision. On the other hand, there have been opportunities to change things and to alter the direction and instead the rank and file chose to support the status quo, and indeed, those who spoke out have been sidelined, while some of the most fawning supporters of the board have been rewarded. Of course, 'nothing to do with me guv' is a good way for people to get out of taking responsibility for the decisions that have been made.

    You were challenged at the time about your statement about Washford during the FS events, I note that you have repeated it again and failed to respond to those who have said your claims are untrue. Which I think says everything about your 'objectivity'.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 14, 2021

Share This Page