If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Why did the GWR not use smoke deflectors?

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by timmydunn, Apr 20, 2015.

  1. timmydunn

    timmydunn Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2007
    Messages:
    396
    Likes Received:
    299
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Trains and data
    Location:
    City of London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Come to think of it, why didn't the LNER use them on all their express locomotives? Was it a question of aesthetics?

    Maybe I'm over-simplifying the situation here - but so many of the Southern locos had them, as did LMS. Surely they were a benefit to crews, in which case, why were they not employed more often?
     
  2. Reading General

    Reading General Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    May 18, 2011
    Messages:
    6,081
    Likes Received:
    2,217
    they didn't need them..... simple as
     
  3. timmydunn

    timmydunn Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2007
    Messages:
    396
    Likes Received:
    299
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Trains and data
    Location:
    City of London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Why did the Southern locos need them?
     
  4. Phil-d259

    Phil-d259 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2015
    Messages:
    703
    Likes Received:
    736
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Problems with exhaust from the chimney obscuring the drivers view on the King Arthurs. Maunsell did some research, including trials of a number of designs and concluded smoke deflectors improved things. As a result all his designs (N15, LN, V, U & N) got them retrofitted or fitted from new.

    Presumably the GWR's drafting arrangements didn't cause problems so smoke deflectors were never felt necessary.
     
  5. paulhitch

    paulhitch Guest

    By the time they came into use generally, the G.W.R. had retreated into "not invented here". An example of this away from the locomotive field can be found in the antiquated doorlocks fitted to post W.W.II coaching stock.

    PH
     
  6. Jimc

    Jimc Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,052
    Likes Received:
    4,665
    Occupation:
    Once computers, now part time writer I suppose.
    Location:
    SE England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    It will be interesting to see if 6023 runs into any issues with her radically revised draughting that's being worked up.
    There could be a dilemma there: she was back revved to single chimney so as to experience again a single chimney King, but if the revised draughting caused by the loading gauge change means she no longer sounds like a single chimney King, (or worse still smoke is a major problem making a need for s**** d********s) would it be better to return to a double chimney?
     
  7. gwr4090

    gwr4090 Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2005
    Messages:
    2,847
    Likes Received:
    222
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Scientist (Rtd)
    Location:
    Dorset
    Also GWR engines had a significant taper on the top surface of the boiler, coupled with tall chimneys (due to the more generous loading gauge), and higher exhaust velocity, all of which meant that steam was carried well clear of the cab.
     
  8. Reading General

    Reading General Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    May 18, 2011
    Messages:
    6,081
    Likes Received:
    2,217
    Sorry but that's total nonsense and I can quote 18000 reasons why...or even 18100
     
  9. Martin Perry

    Martin Perry Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    16,510
    Likes Received:
    7,753
    Location:
    1012 / 60158
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I think it was more a case of not being needed.
     
  10. andalfi1

    andalfi1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2008
    Messages:
    1,006
    Likes Received:
    466
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Semi Retired.
    Location:
    Haworth
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The clue is in the title, Smoke deflectors, not Steam, not Exhaust, Smoke, and what is one of the characteristics of Welsh steam coal? its Smokeless ! Deflectors not required.
     
  11. paulhitch

    paulhitch Guest

    So why does one heritage railway which uses such stock find it necessary to print leaflets to be given to everyone buying tickets which warn them about the locks?

    PH
     
  12. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,106
    Likes Received:
    57,442
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I'm not a big LMS expert, but my feeling is that most later LMS locos (i.e. the Staniers) didn't use them. Jubilees, Black 5s, Stanier Moguls, Princess Elizabeths (whatever they are called) didn't have smoke deflectors; only the Duchesses at which point you are getting to very big boilers and therefore very short chimneys. Amongst LMS locos, isn't it more the older designs that have them, i.e. Patriots etc? Presumably the combination of draughting and boiler shape are very different on those locos than on the later Stanier designs.

    There are good reasons for not using smoke deflectors if possible, notably better forward vision, not to mention extra expense. So presumably designers fitted them as a last resort, i.e. when the combination of boiler size, chimney height and exhaust velocity made them essential to provide forward visibility. Presumably those combination of factors meant that drifting steam was never a problem on GWR locos.

    Tom
     
  13. andalfi1

    andalfi1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2008
    Messages:
    1,006
    Likes Received:
    466
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Semi Retired.
    Location:
    Haworth
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    But what about the later rebuilds Tom, Scots, Patriots & Jubilees, all had them fitted ? and most probably THE most attractive of all smoke deflectors, along with the A3 Gerry Blinks !
     
  14. Spamcan81

    Spamcan81 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Messages:
    35,121
    Likes Received:
    20,773
    Occupation:
    Training moles
    Location:
    The back of beyond
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Calling them smoke deflectors is a misnomer. They were there to deflect the exhaust no matter what it consisted of.
     
    andrewshimmin and Sheff like this.
  15. Jimc

    Jimc Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,052
    Likes Received:
    4,665
    Occupation:
    Once computers, now part time writer I suppose.
    Location:
    SE England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I've seen more than one source suggest that a boiler tapered at the top plus the shoulders of the belpaire firebox creates useful airflow for clearing the visibility. Presumably the velocity of the exhaust is a factor too.
     
    andrewshimmin likes this.
  16. std tank

    std tank Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Messages:
    3,808
    Likes Received:
    946
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Liverpool
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Interesting to note that the official title for the deflectors fitted to the Brits, Clans and 9Fs is Plates for Preventing Down Draught.
     
  17. Phil-d259

    Phil-d259 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2015
    Messages:
    703
    Likes Received:
    736
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Maybe because its their way of complying with the ROGS legislation. Please remember that the legislative environment we operate in is vastly stricter than what prevailed in previous decades. If someone fell out of a door that was not properly secured, the first reaction from the investigators would be "How does your SMS (which ALL railways need to have) mitigate the risk of this occurring?" - It is unacceptable in the eyes of the regulators to simply blame the user these days. Putting information about door locks and other safety information (i.e. steam engines have hot surfaces and emit smoke and smuts which could get in peoples eyes) in a leaflet issued to every passenger group is one way of mitigating the risk - and having lots of platform staff to monitor the train before and during departure is another.

    I would also add that with the demise of slam doors on lots of trains on the national network, even opening a bog standard Mk1 door can be hard for some - there are even tales of people pressing the rubber bump stop thinking it is a push button and the door will open automatically for them.
     
  18. Martin Perry

    Martin Perry Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    16,510
    Likes Received:
    7,753
    Location:
    1012 / 60158
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    To make sure people are aware of how they work ... ?
     
    GWRArry likes this.
  19. LMS2968

    LMS2968 Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,987
    Likes Received:
    5,084
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Lecturer retired: Archivist of Stanier Mogul Fund
    Location:
    Wigan
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The need or otherwise for smoke deflectors has one or more of several causes. Initially, a steam locomotive is aerodynamically a poor piece of kit, having a fairly large, flat surface - the smokebox ring and door - being pushed into the air ahead of it. This air is forcibly moved out of the way, both to each side and upwards, and this movement away causes a low pressure areas above and either side of the boiler barrel, into which the exhaust is drawn downwards, so interfering with forward vision. Smoke deflectors extend forward of the smokebox door and back along the smokebox, and the effect is to catch and channel the air that would otherwise be forced out rearwards along the side of the boiler, so creating high pressure in this area and forcing the exhaust upwards, clear of the driver's vision.

    So what factors cause this drawing down into this low pressure area? Firstly, the sheer size of the smokebox being forced forward: the bigger it is, the more air it will displace, the lower the air pressure along the boiler sides. Secondly, the height of the chimney: the higher the chimney, the further the exhaust is from the low pressure area on release to atmosphere so the less likely it is to be drawn into it. Thirdly, the pressure of the exhaust from the blastpipe: designers try to reduce this as much as possible as it is effectively acting on the wrong side of the pistons, so reducing the engine's efficiency. But the lower pressure fails to lift the exhaust high enough, so is again drawn down into the low pressure area.

    Staying with the LMS, smoke defflectors were fitted only to engines with large smokeboxes and/or double chimneys, where exhaust pressure wais low. The standard Jubilees had a fairly small smokebox and tall chimney but the rebuilds had bigger smokeboxes and double chimneys, so needed deflectors. The Lizzies didn't need them: single, and tall, chimney. The original Coronations didn't need them either, not until fitted with double chimneys.

    Now apply that to the GWR: relatively small smokeboxes due to the taper boilers, no double chimneys, taller than average chimneys, and, as the noise will show, a lot of pressure in the exhaust to lift it clear. So they weren't needed.
     
    GWRArry, ragl and Sheff like this.
  20. Martin Perry

    Martin Perry Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    16,510
    Likes Received:
    7,753
    Location:
    1012 / 60158
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Until the 1950s that is.
     

Share This Page