35B's Recent Activity
-
35B replied to the thread SVR General Discussion.
Thank you for sharing.
Jul 17, 2026 at 2:29 PM -
35B liked 2857Harry's post in the thread SVR General Discussion.
Official Statement from Jonathan Dunster - “An incident involving 4930 Hagley Halloccurred at Bridgnorth motive power depot on the evening of Sunday 12 July. “The locomotive is currently awaiting assessment, and I’m pleased to report that no...
Jul 17, 2026 at 2:28 PM -
35B liked 26D_M's post in the thread SVR General Discussion.
Equally, thank heavens there was nobody at work inside the door and nothing happened which resulted in fire or explosion.
Jul 17, 2026 at 2:06 PM -
35B replied to the thread North Yorkshire Moors Railway General Discussion.
Because there are specific local circumstances that lend themselves to local risk assessment differing from the national position.
Jul 17, 2026 at 11:00 AM -
35B replied to the thread SVR General Discussion.
I hereby waive all copyright in my suggestions upthread if SVR wish to use them. More seriously, the context here is a situation where information is in the public domain, and the railway are scrambling to contain discussion. My curiosity was...
Jul 17, 2026 at 10:45 AM -
35B liked Pete Thornhill's post in the thread SVR General Discussion.
Does that common sense extend to whoever it was that shared photos taken from inside the shed who must be SVR connected? It’s all over social media and those particular photos just fuel speculation and it’s all well saying speculation is...
Jul 17, 2026 at 10:37 AM -
35B replied to the thread SVR General Discussion.
Common sense works both ways here. Demanding a detailed update is unreasonable for the reasons you give. But demanding that people don't speculate is a Canute like exercise - hence observing that putting something brief into the public domain...
Jul 17, 2026 at 10:16 AM -
35B replied to the thread SVR General Discussion.
That's fine, but it relies on there being something "official" to fill the void.
Jul 17, 2026 at 10:01 AM
