If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

jnc 近期的活动

  1. jnc 支持 SheffKent & East Sussex Railway 内发表的帖子.

    Never heard of it in all my 70 years, and I’ve worked my share of them in the past.

    2026-04-02 , 19:50
  2. jnc 回复主题: North Norfolk Railway General Discussion.

    Another new Carriage & Wagon Blog post: C&W News - March News Contains some interesting details on an assessment of the Great Eastern Railway 1907 Brake Third 295. Noel

    2026-04-02 , 12:40
  3. jnc 支持 47406North Yorkshire Moors Railway General Discussion 内发表的帖子.

    BRIDGE 42 UPDATE We are currently repairing Bridge 42, which sits between the tunnel and Grosmont station. Unfortunately, the work required to resume services over the bridge will not be completed until May. As a result, at the start of the 2026...

    2026-04-02 , 11:18
  4. jnc 支持 KingscrossNorth Yorkshire Moors Railway General Discussion 内发表的帖子.

    I'm suprised the local authority has asked for Listed Building Consent (LBC) for the propping, temporary works are normally exempt provided there is no intrusion in fabric and the temporary works are entirely reversible. Perhaps they have...

    2026-04-02 , 11:17
  5. jnc 支持 SteveKent & East Sussex Railway 内发表的帖子.

    You may call them spades to go with your so-called buckets. We call them shovels on our locomotives.;)

    2026-04-02 , 11:16
  6. jnc 支持 flying scotsman123North Yorkshire Moors Railway General Discussion 内发表的帖子.

    That sounds quite different to a Flood Risk Activity Permit (FRAP) which is what I suspect most people are thinking of, even if they didn't know that's what it was. However, upon checking the EA website, that bit of river is not a statutory main...

    2026-04-02 , 01:49
  7. jnc 支持 JamessquaredSwanage Railway General Discussion 内发表的帖子.

    The purists will be complaining about the LSWR headcode with a BR livery :rolleyes: Tom

    2026-04-02 , 01:48
  8. jnc 支持 JamessquaredBluebell Railway General Discussion 内发表的帖子.

    No half measures with research here! Tom

    2026-04-02 , 01:46
  9. jnc 支持 MiffKent & East Sussex Railway 内发表的帖子.

    Something similar (Bodiam dismantled and left in the open for years) has already been done in the preservation era at various times in the '80s & '90s. Nostalgic though I am for the Col. Stephens era, hopefully not again any time soon :)

    2026-04-01 , 15:37
  10. jnc 支持 paul1609North Yorkshire Moors Railway General Discussion 内发表的帖子.

    Problem is if you look at the condition of the underside of the bridge in the photos in the planning application theres a good chance you'd ideally need to carry out some work prior to propping the bridge. That work would need planning permission...

    2026-04-01 , 15:36
  11. jnc 支持 SteveNorth Yorkshire Moors Railway General Discussion 内发表的帖子.

    Propping the bridge and the planning permission are two different things. Because the bridge is a listed structure the proposed repairs require listed building approval (planning permission). Propping the bridge does not affect the structure and...

    2026-04-01 , 15:35
  12. jnc 回复主题: Bluebell Railway General Discussion.

    I guess I'm not very awake either! Tom's original post was so long, and detailed (much work to create, surely) that it was easy to get taken in, if one had forgotten the date! Noel

    2026-04-01 , 15:34
  13. jnc 支持 Paul.UniBluebell Railway General Discussion 内发表的帖子.

    Someone didn't take note of todays date.

    2026-04-01 , 15:19
  14. jnc 支持 David MylchreestBluebell Railway General Discussion 内发表的帖子.

    While I don't in the slightest object to new build locomotives, the more the better, I do think that 9017 is an historic locomotive in it's own right and should be curated as such. The Bluebell is totally wrong in this piece of vandalism

    2026-04-01 , 15:19
  15. jnc 支持 Mark ThompsonBluebell Railway General Discussion 内发表的帖子.

    ...and now, about the liveries. BR black for both?

    2026-04-01 , 11:03