And notably Mr Summers declined to submit a longer piece, which seems odd. I've no idea whether this is because he couldn't be bothered, doesn't...
It's amazing how no-one is ever to blame, @DaveE . Even if they're the Trustee in charge of heritage matters. How odd....
You could indeed, given that the only basis anyone has come up with, @Meatman is the M&A's general power to do things clause, which in another...
This is certainly an election where name recognition is likely to play a disproportionate role, but if Members want a fresh(er) start, they may...
@DaveE - we agree on the need for progress!
Forgive me labouring the point, @DaveE , but the TWAO and planning is essential to extending the railway and are the big strategic questions that...
^^^^ times 10 - thanks @Jamessquared
So what do you think, @DaveE ?
What is it about the carriages project that needs a Trustee in charge of it, @DaveE ? It isn't a strategic priority in the same sense as planning...
My understanding is that it isn't a rule @62440 , it is simply an edict from Peter Miles - unless others can help, I can't see anything in the...
@DaveE , the level of discontent with the situation is clear from posts like @martin1656 , and when deciding who to vote for, I'll look at what...
As @Lineisclear has sensibly set out above, @DaveE this can be solved by doing the right thing even without agreeing on the legal basis. What...
@DaveE - so tell Mr Summers to tell Mr Miles to put Chris Lane's motion on the Agenda. And yes, and excellent crop of candidates - great to see.
Even if this is true (and I await my own advice on this), the point @Lineisclear is that the record shows that the motions to remove Anne Belsey...
@DaveE - what I posted is what it means, and the implication is that the Board need to put Chris and Steve's motion to the vote as Motion 1 at the...
Separate names with a comma.
