If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

4003 Lode Star

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by arthur maunsell, Jan 22, 2019.

  1. arthur maunsell

    arthur maunsell Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    Messages:
    1,047
    Likes Received:
    140
    Location:
    by the fire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    With Lady of Legend virtually finished, I think now would be a good time to campaign to have the Star transferred to Didcot to display alongside.

    I used to think that the Star should not be restored to working order, but I have changed my mind. This is because the loco is not in original condition but also is not in final condition, because the elbow steam pipes have been removed but the inside cylinder block was not changed. I believe for this reason the Star could be returned to working order. Even if it was a static exhibit, Didcot next to a Saint is where it should be, permanently preferably, but even as a temporary visitor it would be good.
     
  2. MellishR

    MellishR Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Messages:
    8,136
    Likes Received:
    5,216
    I agree that it would be good to move the Star to Didcot, whether temporarily or permanently. Restoration to working order is more questionable. Are the outside cylinders and valves of the type to go with inside steam pipes or do they not have any steam connections?
     
  3. std tank

    std tank Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Messages:
    3,816
    Likes Received:
    951
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Liverpool
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Do you expect a working steam loco (2999) to be kept at Didcot? Hopefully, it will be running at various lines throughout the country for the next nine years.
     
  4. 61624

    61624 Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2006
    Messages:
    5,294
    Likes Received:
    3,596
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    It all depends on how you view Didcot, I suppose


















    As a restoration centre providing locos for the benefit of others, or as an attraction in its own right? I have no axe to grind, I'm not a GWS member or supporter, but it seems to me that the whole point of Didcot is to be as close as possible to a working GWR depot and to display as comprehensive a cross section of GWR locos and rolling stock as possible. Locos need to be in steam but people get to see more of them compared to a heritage railway because they don't disappear up the line for an hour or two at a time.. Occasional visits to other lines, yes, but not prolonged ones.
     
  5. arthur maunsell

    arthur maunsell Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    Messages:
    1,047
    Likes Received:
    140
    Location:
    by the fire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I believe all they have done is remove the elbow pipes and plate over the holes in the smokebox wrapper. It wouldn't be sanctioned to change the inside cylinder block*, even if the finance could be found, so it seems to me restoring the elbows and thus return it to it's final service condition would at least make it authentic.

    * probably have to change the entire cylinders
     
  6. Cartman

    Cartman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2015
    Messages:
    2,292
    Likes Received:
    1,674
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Van driver
    Location:
    Cheshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Sod all this "perfect originality" stuff. This thinking is what led to the loss of Ben Alder. Get it in steam!
     
    MattA, Landshrew and Reformed Sniper like this.
  7. Mr Valentine

    Mr Valentine Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2018
    Messages:
    235
    Likes Received:
    815
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Titfield
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Just to give a bit of clarification, as I think there may be a bit of a mix up going on. The engine wouldn't need new cylinders, the change between 'inside' and 'elbow' is purely to do with the steampipe arrangement in the smokebox, and not within the cylinders themselves. When it was done up at Swindon in the 60's, the original steampipe configuration was restored, so there isn't anything 'missing.' That said, I think debates about what would be needed to get it going are rather academic these days.

    As it stands, the engine currently gives a fair representation of how it would have appeared in the late 20's/early 30's. (Or rather it does if you ignore all the polished bull...)
     
    S.A.C. Martin likes this.
  8. Nick Gough

    Nick Gough Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2006
    Messages:
    1,433
    Likes Received:
    340
    Location:
    Northamptonshire
    Once the NRM have de-accessioned 4003 they won't be concerned about its 'originality' any more.
     
  9. Pete Thornhill

    Pete Thornhill Resident of Nat Pres Staff Member Administrator Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Messages:
    7,522
    Likes Received:
    5,499
    What makes you think that will happen?

    Personally I understand the originality arguments but I must admit I’m firmly in the working engine camp. Taking Green Arrow as an example, I get that the mono bloc casting is unique but if it’s that important then preserve it too! On that basis I would support a return to working order, much the same for 4003.
     
  10. arthur maunsell

    arthur maunsell Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    Messages:
    1,047
    Likes Received:
    140
    Location:
    by the fire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    then you agree originality doesn't enter into it and that's what was quoted as the reason for not steaming it. Given it's not original, there's no reason why it can't be put back into steam imo.
     
  11. Mr Valentine

    Mr Valentine Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2018
    Messages:
    235
    Likes Received:
    815
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Titfield
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    It depends what you define as 'originality.' If you mean the parts which were originally fitted when the engine first came out of Swindon in 1907, then as soon as it went back for its first intermediate overhaul, it would've started losing original parts. By the time it was withdrawn, a significant amount of the engine would no longer be original.

    If, on the other hand, you consider 'originality' to be 'steam-era Swindon/Wolverhampton work,' then it is absolutely 100% original. I think this is the stance the NRM take.
     
  12. LesterBrown

    LesterBrown Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2009
    Messages:
    995
    Likes Received:
    761
    Location:
    Devon
    Putting Lode Star on display alongside LoL would only encourage the "all GWR express locos look the same" brigade.

    Rather than show a comparison with a design a year younger than the Lady it would be more illuminating to display it with a design still being built seven years earlier and still going strong when the Ladies were built. I suggest it would be great if the Steamtown built replica of the Dean single "Queen" was liberated from Windsor and found a new home at Didcot.
     
  13. Daddsie71b

    Daddsie71b Member Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2013
    Messages:
    785
    Likes Received:
    643
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    34091
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    No, any idiot can see they are different. Some are painted black, some green and the odd one or two blue.

    Oh, and i forgot the celebratory red one.
     
    Last edited: Jan 24, 2019
    35B, MattA, Spinner and 10 others like this.
  14. MellishR

    MellishR Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Messages:
    8,136
    Likes Received:
    5,216
    My understanding is that inside and outside steam pipes go different ways into the valves, so changing the pipes means also changing the valves and therefore the cylinder assmblies. Did they not need new cylinders for 2999 to go with the inside steam pipes?
     
  15. arthur maunsell

    arthur maunsell Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    Messages:
    1,047
    Likes Received:
    140
    Location:
    by the fire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    that was my understanding too
     
  16. Greenway

    Greenway Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2008
    Messages:
    3,911
    Likes Received:
    3,713
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    South Hams
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    As far as 'all GWR express locos' etc. etc, is concerned I have to admit that many Stanier locos, particularly Black Fives, look very much GWR in appearance - just a few extras added and a few omitted. :D
    But we all know where he learned his trade. ;)
     
  17. Jimc

    Jimc Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,058
    Likes Received:
    4,685
    Occupation:
    Once computers, now part time writer I suppose.
    Location:
    SE England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Yes, the Saint needed inside steam pipe cylinders. But the Stars are different. As originally built, if I understand correctly, there were steam pipes wholly between the frames to feed the outside cylinders. What the "elbow" pipes did was to take the steam out of the sides of the smokebox as the later style boilers were constructed to do, and they then disappeared back between the frames for the earlier style cylinders. One hopes that Swindon managed to find the old style front end components so Lode Star has the complete early arrangement.
     
  18. Mr Valentine

    Mr Valentine Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2018
    Messages:
    235
    Likes Received:
    815
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Titfield
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Yes that's essentially it. If you look at the elbow pipes, ask yourself, 'where are they going?' And you have the answer. They're not 'inside' like they are on the Saints, it's just that they're not immediately obvious. With the Saints, the steam pipes enter to the side of the blast pipe. As is well known, later on both Saints and Stars were fitted with cylinders where the steam pipes entered directly on top of the valve chest, in other words, 'outside.' The valves remain unaffected by all this.
     
  19. Jimc

    Jimc Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,058
    Likes Received:
    4,685
    Occupation:
    Once computers, now part time writer I suppose.
    Location:
    SE England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
  20. arthur maunsell

    arthur maunsell Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    Messages:
    1,047
    Likes Received:
    140
    Location:
    by the fire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    did they go to that trouble though? they didn't bother too much about blocking the holes in the smokebox wrapper properly.
     

Share This Page