If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

60163 Real or Replica?

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by Huff Puff, Jul 21, 2009.

  1. John Elliot Jnr

    John Elliot Jnr New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2007
    Messages:
    1,247
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Museum curator
    Location:
    71A
  2. Spamcan81

    Spamcan81 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Messages:
    30,435
    Likes Received:
    14,528
    Occupation:
    Training moles
    Location:
    The back of beyond
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Spot the winking smiley?
     
  3. John Elliot Jnr

    John Elliot Jnr New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2007
    Messages:
    1,247
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Museum curator
    Location:
    71A
    Haha! It wasn't your post that caused this. It was more to with the very unfortunate mistype a few posts above...
     
  4. Spamcan81

    Spamcan81 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Messages:
    30,435
    Likes Received:
    14,528
    Occupation:
    Training moles
    Location:
    The back of beyond
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Haha! It wasn't your post that caused this. It was more to with the very unfortunate mistype a few posts above...[/quote:2abbsiy1]

    Ah, the 60103 typo?
     
  5. John Elliot Jnr

    John Elliot Jnr New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2007
    Messages:
    1,247
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Museum curator
    Location:
    71A
    Ah, the 60103 typo?[/quote:fl385rme]

    Precisely. ](*,)
     
  6. saltydog

    saltydog New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    2,566
    Likes Received:
    70
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Birmingham
  7. All members, except the first member, of a class are exact replicas (or given some modifications, eg SDJR 7Fs, close replicas) of the first original member. All are real. In my humble opinion.

    Steve
    (WSW)
     
  8. Spot the ....
     
  9. tuffer5552

    tuffer5552 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2006
    Messages:
    400
    Likes Received:
    1
    Not sure if anyone has made this point already....
    Isn't Tornado an A1.1?

    Sort of A1 Mk 2.

    They've taken the original and altered it slightly to incorporate some modern advances.
     
  10. 73129

    73129 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2007
    Messages:
    4,289
    Likes Received:
    709
    Location:
    Winchester
    Reading all the above comments about 60163 being a replica or not is undecided. But when 32424 beachy head is finished and running at the Bluebell she will be a replica and can't be described has any think else.
    :-k :-k :-k :-k
     
  11. 34007

    34007 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2007
    Messages:
    3,191
    Likes Received:
    1
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Hampshire
    You can argue the fact all day about any steam loco?? What is a replica and what is real? Does a Replica make it the fact an engine was re-named or re-numbered as such or carry a different boiler, but then yet carries its original cab fittings?

    You could say the exact same thing for which the Bluebell are homing on in... The H2 or even this... http://www.bluebell-railway.co.uk/blueb ... 84030.html
     
  12. Rumpole

    Rumpole Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2005
    Messages:
    2,396
    Likes Received:
    438
    Occupation:
    Tea-Maker
    Location:
    34105
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Or as I understand it will have one or two 'original' components, does that make it an overhaul/rebuild...? :smt002
     
  13. Sir Nigel Gresley

    Sir Nigel Gresley New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2006
    Messages:
    880
    Likes Received:
    148
    Occupation:
    Retired Soldier of Fortune
    Location:
    Dorset
    As in numerous previous postings on similar-veined threads in this forum, I refer to the Castle Cary (Scotland, not Somerset) accident of 1937, in which LNER A3 No.2744 Grand Parade (BR 60090) was irreparably damaged. The (reasonably intact) loco was towed to Doncaster Works, and a new loco was constructed, and given the number 2744 and named Grand Parade, receiving the name- and worksplates from the opriginal. I believe that the two Grand Parades actually stood within a few hundred metres of each other! The damaged loco was then scrapped. There is no evidence to suggest that the new 2744 or 60090 was considered to be a replica. By this token, if 60163 were to be given an original component, be it numberplate, nameplate, worksplate, whistle etc. from, say, 60134 Foxhunter, it becomes that loco, fully in keeping with LNER practice. As for changes in construction materials etc. I can't imagine that a Darlington A1 was identical to a Doncaster one - take the rivetting on the cab, for instance!

    A similar situation occurred at Darlington when some of the B16's were being rebuilt, although as I am at work (!) I do not have my reference material handy.

    Previous postings have suggested that Tornado should be, variously, an A1/1 or A1/2. The reason that LNER 4470 Great Northern (BR 60113) became Class A1/1 on being vindictively butchered by Thompson (ex-North Eastern, and miffed that he didn't get the CME job on formation of the LNER) was that at the time of rebuilding Great Northern was still an original Class A1, having not been reboilered etc. into Class A3, and therefore, the logical classification for the rebuild was A1/1 in keeping with LNER classification policy (although you could argue that the originals should have become A1/1 and the rebuild A1/2, as Gresley rebuilds of ex-NER B16 became B16/2, and Thompson rebuilds B16/3 whilst the originals became B16/1!) However, shortly afterwards the originals became Class A10, Flying Scotsman being one of the last to be converted to A3, (but I won't enter into that debate!) to leave A1 available for the new standard Pacifics, of which Great Northern was to have been the prototype - thank goodness Peppercorn had the design changed - I believe his staff were secretly working on this even before Thompson retired.
     
  14. Spamcan81

    Spamcan81 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Messages:
    30,435
    Likes Received:
    14,528
    Occupation:
    Training moles
    Location:
    The back of beyond
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I believe this was down to accounting practices. A brand new loco would have been charged to capital account whereas the "repaired" loco was charged to current account. 2744 was of course a new loco but not according to the accounts.
     
  15. ADB968008

    ADB968008 Guest

    Does that make Metropolitan No 1 real or replica then ?

    It puts 4965 in an interesting category as well.. it is a real 4965 or a replica 4983 ?
     
  16. stallis

    stallis New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2008
    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    0
    There was an interesting article in a recent Quainton News (Buckinghamshire railway Centre) about Met 1 and whether it was built as a replacement for the original Met 1, or was a new build and just took the Met 1 number - a subtle distinction. If I remember rightly from the article the belief is that whilst it was a different class from the original Met 1, for accountancy purposes it was a repair / rebuild of the original Met 1 rather than a new build!

    When I am back in the country I'll try to dig the article out (if I remember!).
     
  17. 1472

    1472 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2008
    Messages:
    1,650
    Likes Received:
    1,864
    As I see it there will in future be 3 types of loco:

    1. Origonal ones which are substantially comprising of parts which existed pre 1968 (ex BR or earlier)
    2. New builds which have been built to the drawings of BR or earlier companies WITHOUT COMPRIMISE to the origonal design (eg boiler with copper firebox, rivets where there should be rivets etc)
    3. New builds which have substantially adapted an origonal design (or are a completely new design)

    Category 1 are as close as we will get to being 100% genuine real locos (ones that can still operate)
    Category 2 will be a good advert for the movement if well built and help for the future
    Category 3 are a real worry - why? - because we run a real risk of creating theme park stuff where everything starts to sink into an ever more approximate representation of "real" locos & where without some boundaries the quality product which many of our steam railways currently deliver will be devalued.
     
  18. John Elliot Jnr

    John Elliot Jnr New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2007
    Messages:
    1,247
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Museum curator
    Location:
    71A
    Not necessarily. Sometimes this is the only viable means of representing something that has long been lost. Iron Duke, for example...
     
  19. The Saggin' Dragon

    The Saggin' Dragon Part of the furniture Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    15,144
    Likes Received:
    5,434
    Location:
    1012 / 60158
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    That will put 2999, 6880 etc into an interesting category.
     
  20. richards

    richards Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2008
    Messages:
    4,331
    Likes Received:
    1,313
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    What about the "Iron Duke" broad replica which the NRM made out of bits of an Autherity 0-6-0 saddle tank? :-k

    According to '1472' above, that suggests that the NRM is making "theme park stuff" :-# [retreats to moderators' bomb-proof bunker]

    Richard
     

Share This Page