If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

6100 Royal Scot..Progress 2010/2011/2012

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by belle1, Mar 8, 2010.

  1. keith6233

    keith6233 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    573
    Likes Received:
    150
    Occupation:
    Engineer
    Location:
    Manchester
    Re: 6100 Royal Scot..Progress 2010/2011


    I think you should look at who was on the board of trustees at the time so while Alan Bloom was the face of Bressingham who was advising him.

    It also cost the head of the NRM is job, who left with a gagging order unable to speak about it
     
  2. MuzTrem

    MuzTrem Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    940
    Likes Received:
    1,238
    Re: 6100 Royal Scot..Progress 2010/2011

    How pedantic do you want to be? In 1968, there were only two standard gauge preserved lines that had re-opened and were running regular passenger services...Middleton was still primarily a freight operation at that stage. Besides, even today the Middleton couldn't accomodate 6100, 6233 or 70013! And note that I said preserved lines rather than steam centres. The point is, in the 1960s there weren't many places where SG engines were regularly accessible to the public. Bressingham helped to fill that gap.
     
  3. guard_jamie

    guard_jamie Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    2,503
    Likes Received:
    27
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Signalman
    Location:
    Herefordshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Re: 6100 Royal Scot..Progress 2010/2011

    I'm sorry that I was a bit petulant with my last comment. I think though that it is a disservice to other fledgling SG centres at that time - the Chasewater, the SVR, the Foxfield and the GWS amongst - to consider them unmentionable in the context of 1968.
     
  4. Guest

    Guest Part of the furniture Account Suspended

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    3,614
    Likes Received:
    21
    Occupation:
    Occasional
    Location:
    G C & N S
    Re: 6100 Royal Scot..Progress 2010/2011

    Severn Valley Railway, Dinting Railway Centre, storage at York Shed, Leeds Neville Hill, etc, just to mention those within driving distance then - the world wasn't quite so unsympathetic before the steam ban was lifted
     
  5. martin butler

    martin butler Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2008
    Messages:
    3,440
    Likes Received:
    388
    Re: 6100 Royal Scot..Progress 2010/2011

    That is a very good point, Alan bloom was just the "face" i should think the real power was with the trustees , why else was it so hard to remove 70013, was David Ward a trustee at this time? because he was very instumental in 70013 going to Bressingham in the first place . getting onto the ex Butlins engines, were they gifted to Bressingham or did they have to buy them, Did 6233 and 6201 get sold to Bressingham before going to the midland trust,
     
  6. huochemi

    huochemi Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    May 6, 2008
    Messages:
    2,757
    Likes Received:
    1,395
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    UK
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Re: 6100 Royal Scot..Progress 2010/2011

    Carnforth must have been around because they managed to get a (temporary) injunction preventing the movement of one or both of 6233/6100 to Bressingham.
     
  7. MuzTrem

    MuzTrem Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    940
    Likes Received:
    1,238
    Re: 6100 Royal Scot..Progress 2010/2011

    I didn't mean to portray those places as "unmentionable", and I'm sorry if my post came across that way. I just wanted to emphasise how much smaller the SG scene was then than it is today. Of the places you and Frank list, probably ony Didoct could have provided the big engines with secure undercover storage - and would they have wanted them, since they were not Great Western? It's well recorded that many of the sheds BR stored National Collection engiens at in the '60s were not very secure, they were not open to the public, and at the time one no-one was certain that BR wouldn't simply turn round and order the whole lot to be scrapped. In those circumstances, Bressingham was by far the better home for these engines. I just don't understand how a man who founded a preservation centre can be so demonised by railways enthusiasts!
     
  8. Paul42

    Paul42 Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2006
    Messages:
    5,927
    Likes Received:
    3,864
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    East Grinstead
    Re: 6100 Royal Scot..Progress 2010/2011

    Most will agree that that Bressingham was a good place for the locos at the time - under cover accommodation and accessible to the general public.It was during the 90's when he and/or the trustees considered the loan permanent that upset enthusiasts.
     
  9. Sidmouth

    Sidmouth Resident of Nat Pres Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2005
    Messages:
    9,676
    Likes Received:
    8,408
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Alderan !
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Re: 6100 Royal Scot..Progress 2010/2011

    6201 was never sold to Bressingham being bought by the owning society direct from BR

    6100 , 6233 and 6203 were all sold to Butlins and were on display at Skegness, Ayr and Minehead respectively

    During the 1970's these were moved on loan to new homes , 6100 & 6233 to Bressingham and 6203 to Butterley . When Butlins wished to dispose of the engines the current locations got first refusal so both 6100 and 6233 were I believe bought by Bressingham
     
  10. std tank

    std tank Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Messages:
    3,816
    Likes Received:
    951
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Liverpool
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Re: 6100 Royal Scot..Progress 2010/2011

    Martin, 6203 went to Pwllheli not Minehead. It was towed along the North Wales Coast line and down to Pwllheli by Ivatt 4 43052.
    It was 6229 that went to Minehead.
     
  11. daveb

    daveb Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2005
    Messages:
    943
    Likes Received:
    484
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Wimborne, Dorset
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Re: 6100 Royal Scot..Progress 2010/2011

    6203 was at Pwllheli. It was 6229 which was at Butlins Minehead, and subsequently went on loan to (I think) the Friends of the NRM, before being bought by the NRM. There were also four smaller locos - 32640 at Pwllheli (now IOWSR), 32678 at Minehead (now KESR), 30102 at Skegness and 32662 at Ayr (both now Bressingham).
     
  12. david1984

    david1984 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Messages:
    12,910
    Likes Received:
    1,387
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Birmingham
    Re: 6100 Royal Scot..Progress 2010/2011

    Edit: beaten to the punch
     
  13. Martin Perry

    Martin Perry Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    16,513
    Likes Received:
    7,764
    Location:
    1012 / 60158
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Re: 6100 Royal Scot..Progress 2010/2011

    ... and came back via Barmouth Bridge bridge (eeek!) behind a Class 25
     
  14. MuzTrem

    MuzTrem Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    940
    Likes Received:
    1,238
    Re: 6100 Royal Scot..Progress 2010/2011

    Did anyone get a photo?
     
  15. acorb

    acorb Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2007
    Messages:
    2,534
    Likes Received:
    3,310
    Location:
    Powys
    There was one in one of the steam mags a couple of months ago, possibly Heritage Railway? It was a popular story that it was the weight of the loco that activated the Marine worm that nearly brought about the demise of Barmouth bridge.
     
  16. ilvaporista

    ilvaporista Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    4,251
    Likes Received:
    5,321
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    C.Eng
    Location:
    On the 45th!
    Re: 6100 Royal Scot..Progress 2010/2011

    There was an article in Railway Magazine with pictures, I don't have my copies here so I can't give an exact month.
     
  17. MarkinDurham

    MarkinDurham Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2007
    Messages:
    2,202
    Likes Received:
    973
    Location:
    Durham
    Ahhh, conspiracy theories...don't you just love them? ;)
     
  18. RalphW

    RalphW Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Administrator Friend

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2005
    Messages:
    35,515
    Likes Received:
    9,194
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired-ish, Part time rail tour steward.
    Location:
    Northwich
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Just like a 'B' Si Fi film, heavy train rumbles over old bridge, wakes up sea monster that has been lying undisturbed for a couple of million years..............
     
  19. Sidmouth

    Sidmouth Resident of Nat Pres Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2005
    Messages:
    9,676
    Likes Received:
    8,408
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Alderan !
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Re: 6100 Royal Scot..Progress 2010/2011

    Doh ! you are of course right and i knew that . the move is covered in detail in the book on 46203 by Brian Radford (iirc)
     
  20. guard_jamie

    guard_jamie Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    2,503
    Likes Received:
    27
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Signalman
    Location:
    Herefordshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Re: 6100 Royal Scot..Progress 2010/2011

    I'm not denying the size or situation of most of the SG centres at that time precluded them from accommodating large engines - although in fairness the KWVR had 46115 Scots Guardsman stored for a time, and in the early 70s the SVR had 70000 Britannia - I'm just saying that there were an awful lot more centres of SG steam operation in 1968 than your post suggested.
     

Share This Page