If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

7027 Thornbury Castle

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by svrhunt, Jan 18, 2015.

  1. class8mikado

    class8mikado Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2009
    Messages:
    3,610
    Likes Received:
    1,439
    Occupation:
    Print Estimator/ Repository of Useless Informatio.
    Location:
    Bingley W.Yorks.
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    That a big engine doesnt have to be a 4-6-0, and that big green engines look great... what ? you already knew that ?
     
  2. RAB3L

    RAB3L Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2013
    Messages:
    362
    Likes Received:
    190
    That's true but to do that means changing both tubeplates! They are not going to do that if they are trying to save money.
     
    DrIain likes this.
  3. Tobbes

    Tobbes Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    870
    Likes Received:
    2,357
    No no, @GWR4707 'Manorbier Star' with a No 1 boiler because 'it could've happened'...!
     
    clinker, ross and GWR4707 like this.
  4. RAB3L

    RAB3L Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2013
    Messages:
    362
    Likes Received:
    190
    You are misquoting me. 'Too hard to do/too expensive' does not equal 'not a quick and cheap repair'!
     
  5. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,106
    Likes Received:
    57,444
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I appreciate that; I’m simply correcting the statement that adding more superheater flues increases the heating surface; it does the opposite.

    Tom
     
    clinker likes this.
  6. RAB3L

    RAB3L Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2013
    Messages:
    362
    Likes Received:
    190
    I didn't say that. I was assuming that they would keep 21 flues tubes and only occupy 4 or 6. That would give a lower heating surface than original, as I said.
     
  7. JohnElliott

    JohnElliott New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2014
    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    89
    Gender:
    Male
    Or to Viscount Churchill (pre-rebuild, of course). After all, there's already a Star in existence, but there isn't a Bear...
     
    The Dainton Banker likes this.
  8. class8mikado

    class8mikado Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2009
    Messages:
    3,610
    Likes Received:
    1,439
    Occupation:
    Print Estimator/ Repository of Useless Informatio.
    Location:
    Bingley W.Yorks.
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    An interesting idea, one row of 7 maybe and then dummy elements better for heritage railways ?
    Thinking best left as is for mainline but the original 47xx lubrication circuit not intended for higher superheat...
     
  9. Hunslet589

    Hunslet589 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2017
    Messages:
    122
    Likes Received:
    204
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Oxfordshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I hesitate to step back into the maelstrom of misinformation swirling about in this thread - but what the hell...

    • The numbers quoted are off with the wrong particulars used in comparison with others. For the record, the standard no8 in early form had 14 superheater flues in 2 rows with 6 elements per flue for a total of 263 square feet of superheater area. Later forms of the boiler had 3 (eventually 4) rows of superheater flues (i.e.21 or 28) with 4 elements per flue. That from 7027 has 3 rows which gives a total of 313 square feet of superheat. I suspect that these are the source of the numbers quoted. A standard number 7 on a 47xx has 288 square feet of superheat. i.e. not all that far from that from 7027. Certainly not enough to even think about altering the pressure.
    • There is no need for compensating changes to make up for changes in cylinder bore/stroke. The original intent of using a cylinder block from one of the Barry10 28xxs was dropped in favour of new cylinders modified to meet the NR loading gauge requirements. These have already been cast and their fit into the chassis is pending.
    • One of the quoted attractions of the boiler was that the few inches smaller diameter alleviates the problem of boiler fittings in the latter respect and means less modifications to meet the loading gauge. The copper firebox when all suppliers of a new boiler would be talking of a steel inner box, adds to the attraction.
    I remain a bit on the fence with this overall. The purist says its unwise, the pragmatist says not.
     
    maddog, mdewell and class8mikado like this.
  10. martin1656

    martin1656 Nat Pres stalwart Friend

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2014
    Messages:
    17,611
    Likes Received:
    11,225
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    St Leonards
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    steel vs copper firebox isn't straight foreword, the staying would need to be different
     
    Last edited: Aug 30, 2022
  11. RAB3L

    RAB3L Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2013
    Messages:
    362
    Likes Received:
    190
    I'm not blaming Wikipedia but they've done the same as you, mixing up elements and units. Wikipedia have correctly used the term element in the case of the Castle:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GWR_4073_Class

    and incorrectly in the case of the 4700:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GWR_4700_Class

    Look on the RHS.

    A unit is one straight length of tube of an element, an element is the whole assembly. So one element per flue tube. It seems, with further research, that a no 7 boiler had two rows of flues, not one. So I stand corrected.

    I didn't advocate a higher pressure boiler or changes in cylinder stroke/bore.

    The statement 'The copper firebox when all suppliers of a new boiler would be talking of a steel inner box, adds to the attraction' is almost certainly not true. HBSS have already made a copper firebox for 45551. The statement was most likely used to try to justify the purchase.
     
  12. Sidmouth

    Sidmouth Resident of Nat Pres Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2005
    Messages:
    9,635
    Likes Received:
    8,303
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Alderan !
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    5551 has a new traditional Copper inner firebox boiler built by HBSS , 82045 is having the same traditional copper firebox so it can be done

    the statement from the 4709 chair and parroted from the acolytes comes across as rather hollow
     
    S.A.C. Martin, ghost and Tobbes like this.
  13. KHARDS

    KHARDS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2006
    Messages:
    1,276
    Likes Received:
    75
    Occupation:
    Train Planner
    Location:
    Errr......in front of a computer?

    Have I dreamt the following.....

    The owners of 44901 at Berkley sold their boiler to Ian Riley, with the belief that it was life expired and they had lined up an 8F boiler from Turkey?

    I am sure they sold the boiler and 901 certainly doesn't have a boiler on it. Mr Riley intended to use it as a spare and have one overhauled at all times to increase the availability of his fleet.

    Did I dream/imagine all of the above?
     
    26D_M and paullad1984 like this.
  14. 5944

    5944 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2006
    Messages:
    8,034
    Likes Received:
    7,612
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Train Maintainer for GTR at Hornsey
    Location:
    Letchworth
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    No, that's correct. Quite why they thought selling a repairable boiler and buying an unknown one to bodge to fit was a good idea, we'll probably never know. Oh, any parallels with a certain 47xx?
     
    26D_M likes this.
  15. marshall5

    marshall5 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2010
    Messages:
    2,377
    Likes Received:
    3,981
    Location:
    i.o.m
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    That wouldn't work as the combustion gases will take the path of least resistance i.e. through the empty superheater flues rather than the firetubes. Steam production would be drastically reduced as proved when GNR 251 had to be dragged most of the way by its elder sister 990.
    Ray.
     
  16. 61624

    61624 Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2006
    Messages:
    5,294
    Likes Received:
    3,596
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    80135 on the NYMR is due to receive a new copper firebox before too long, when work resumes on it.
     
  17. marshall5

    marshall5 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2010
    Messages:
    2,377
    Likes Received:
    3,981
    Location:
    i.o.m
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Correct, and he also got the cylinders from 48518.
    Ray.
     
    26D_M likes this.
  18. 61624

    61624 Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2006
    Messages:
    5,294
    Likes Received:
    3,596
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The biggest mistake they seem to have made was not checking that there was an 8F boiler available to buy, before they sold their Black 5 version!. Now, they seem to have ended up with neither!
     
    26D_M, Bluenosejohn and 5944 like this.
  19. MellishR

    MellishR Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Messages:
    8,070
    Likes Received:
    5,165
    Turning a Hall into a Saint was not "preservation" but it was entirely consistent with Didcot's remit as a museum of all things GWR (and successors). It illustrates both the beginning of a long series of locomotive designs and the virtues of standardisation of components. Using major parts of a Castle to help build a 4700 and a Star would likewise not be "preservation", but has anyone claimed that it would be?* Whether it is consistent with Didcot's remit, or whether the differences between the Castle's components and the correct ones for a 4700 and a Star are great enough to invalidate the rebuilds, is a matter of opinion. (But, for the record, I have been persuaded by the arguments on here that using Thornbury's components is a poor idea.)

    *other than by discussion on a "preservation" forum, which in practice is somewhat broader than that in scope

    True!
     
    Hampshire Unit likes this.
  20. RAB3L

    RAB3L Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2013
    Messages:
    362
    Likes Received:
    190
    Agreed. They would have to occupy all the flue tubes. Most (all?) pannier tanks have two unoccupied flue tubes. I'm not sure whether this was a hangover from superheating or to add strength to the top corners.
     

Share This Page