If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

9F construction query

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by 22A, Jan 28, 2016.

  1. 22A

    22A Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    1,090
    Likes Received:
    94
    Occupation:
    Administrator
    Location:
    Between 31F & 34E
    OK, I know that following a survey of the staff at Swindon Works, the name Evening Star was chosen for the final steam locomotive built.
    However, other members of the class up to 92250 were already in service when 92220 emerged.
    How did this come about please? Did Swindon take longer than other Works to construct the same class of loco?
     
  2. Spamcan81

    Spamcan81 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Messages:
    35,121
    Likes Received:
    20,771
    Occupation:
    Training moles
    Location:
    The back of beyond
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I have read more than one account that claims Swindon slowed down constructing its batch to ensure it would build the last BR steam locomotive.
     
  3. Kje7812

    Kje7812 Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2010
    Messages:
    2,653
    Likes Received:
    1,050
    Location:
    Kidderminster/ York
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    It is also said that the 9Fs were delayed for a batch of Warships to be build.
     
  4. W.Williams

    W.Williams Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2015
    Messages:
    1,585
    Likes Received:
    1,465
    Occupation:
    Mechanical Engineer
    Location:
    Aberdeenshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Is it not also true that the Swindon 9F's were considerably more expensive than their Crewe counterparts...adds weight to the extended construction duration
     
  5. LMS2968

    LMS2968 Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,987
    Likes Received:
    5,084
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Lecturer retired: Archivist of Stanier Mogul Fund
    Location:
    Wigan
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    It wasn't that unusual for locos to built, even at the same works, out of numerical sequence, and adding the ingredient of different works simply magnifies the scope. The batches would be ordered possibly months in advance, with each batch being allocated its running number on ordering. The actual sequence in which the locos would appear then depended on the work load on the individual works; the number order as completed made no difference to the operators.

    Probably the most famous anomoly was the first - and as such preserved - Black Five, 5000. Only problem is that this was the first Crewe-built example; Vulcan Foundry delivered 5020 a couple of months earlier, so the real first Black Five is no longer with us.

    I don't say that the conspiracy theories are wrong, but there isn't a solid case for them, either.Unless you have more substantial evidence, of course...
     
    60525, Johnb, Kje7812 and 2 others like this.
  6. bristolian

    bristolian Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2005
    Messages:
    399
    Likes Received:
    123
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Huntingdon. Formerly from Bristol.
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Some of the 75XXX Standard 4s were built out of sequence too.
     
  7. GWR Man.

    GWR Man. Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2014
    Messages:
    2,197
    Likes Received:
    2,413
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Taunton
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Another case that GWR 94XX class 8450 was built in 1949 and 84o8 was built in 1950 with 8449 built in 1954 and 8499 in 1952.
     
  8. Jimc

    Jimc Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,052
    Likes Received:
    4,665
    Occupation:
    Once computers, now part time writer I suppose.
    Location:
    SE England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    quite a few GW classes had odd building sequences. Look at (say) 5101 2-6-2T and 5700 class 0-6-0t and 2251 0-6-0s. Great Western.org.uk is pretty reasonable for this. eg http://www.greatwestern.org.uk/m_in_060_2251.htm. Avoid wikipedia as an online GW reference, it contains some *very* odd stuff.
     
  9. Reading General

    Reading General Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    May 18, 2011
    Messages:
    6,081
    Likes Received:
    2,217
    You need to explain what you mean by these sequences being odd. Then no doubt someone will be able to explain why it was so.

    The 2251 sequence was entirely as you'd expect. numbering started at 2251 as earlier locos then existed below that number...the lower sequence was vacanted later and the sequence jumped to 3200 as per normal.
     
  10. Johnb

    Johnb Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    14,315
    Likes Received:
    16,391
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired, best job I've ever had
    Location:
    Buckinghamshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I can't believe the conspiracy theory, the last of the Crewe batch entered traffic at the end of 1958. Back then the Regions were fairly autonomous and Swindon would have scheduled the Warships as the priority build and the management there possibly didn't even know what was happening at Crewe.

    It's interesting to see that at the naming ceremony the Western Region Chairman, R F Hanks said "this is a proud day for Great Western men everywhere." The old company loyalty lived on 12 years after nationalisation.
     
    LMS2968 likes this.
  11. Ploughman

    Ploughman Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2008
    Messages:
    5,806
    Likes Received:
    2,649
    Occupation:
    Ex a lot of things.
    Location:
    Near where the 3 Ridings meet
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Just been a piece on Portillo talking to the station master on the Henley branch.
    He made a comment about it being Great Western when he started in 1962 even though as he said it was British Railways.
     
  12. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,099
    Likes Received:
    57,414
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Worth remembering that many senior (in age, not necessarily grade) railwaymen in, say, 1960, would have started out in pre-groupng days and may well still hold their allegiance to those companies. A 65-year old driver in 1960 might well have started as a cleaner before the First World War, and quite possibly would consider that things had not necessarily improved since then!

    Tom
     
    LMS2968 likes this.

Share This Page