If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Best looking loco (ex6201 Lizzie overhaul thread)

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by John Petley, Feb 12, 2015.

  1. LesterBrown

    LesterBrown Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2009
    Messages:
    995
    Likes Received:
    761
    Location:
    Devon
    I suspect Collett doesn't get criticised for rebuilding Churchward's prototype locos because the GWR had a such a poor record of preserving locos that the alternative would have been the cutter's torch.
     
  2. maddog

    maddog New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Messages:
    192
    Likes Received:
    89
    [​IMG]
    Most elegant 4-6-0!
     
    Jamessquared likes this.
  3. damianrhysmoore

    damianrhysmoore Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2008
    Messages:
    2,389
    Likes Received:
    2,560
    Occupation:
    Osteopath
    Location:
    London SW8
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I don't understand why there wasn't more enthusiasm for using the boiler from M&GN 50 to make a rebuild of M&GN 50, a class C Johnson 4-4-0. Especially given they were virtually identical to a Midland Railway 1808 class, so could have masqueraded in the Midland livery also.
     
  4. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,099
    Likes Received:
    57,414
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Certainly an attractive loco. Though as 4-6-0s are concerned, I've always been rather taken by the Maunsell N15x rebuilds of the Billinton L class tank engine. (And they were genuine rebuilds incorporating just about everything reusable from the originals, not simply an accountancy job...) A rare example of both original and rebuilds of a loco being equally handsome.

    [​IMG]

    and

    [​IMG]

    (Source: http://1920slocomotives.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/in-memory-1914.html and http://mikemorant.smugmug.com/keyword/n15x)

    Tom
     
    240P15, CH 19, maddog and 1 other person like this.
  5. Reading General

    Reading General Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    May 18, 2011
    Messages:
    6,081
    Likes Received:
    2,217
    best 4-6-0[​IMG]
     
    Matt37401 and andrewshimmin like this.
  6. 242A1

    242A1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,558
    Likes Received:
    1,299
    It might well have been the best performer. Pity that we are unable to test it. As for best looking, I am not too sure. It would win the prize for having the best looking nameplate though.
     
    Reading General likes this.
  7. John Petley

    John Petley Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2007
    Messages:
    2,848
    Likes Received:
    2,360
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Researcher/writer and composer of classical music
    Location:
    Between LBSCR 221 and LBSCR 227
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Al in all, we've got a pretty good selection of attractive locos in this country. I've already spouted on at length about my Edwardian/late Victoran favourites, but coming to more recent times, I rather like the look of the BR4 80xxx 2-6-4 tanks locos and the 82xxx 2-6-2Ts as well. Any other takers or am I alone here?
     
  8. flying scotsman123

    flying scotsman123 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    10,437
    Likes Received:
    17,937
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cheltenham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I do like the std 4mt tanks, no idea why, but just looks 'good!'
     
  9. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,099
    Likes Received:
    57,414
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I wonder how much it is possible to mentally disentangle "looks good" from "performs well"? In other words, would one still consider the 80xxx tanks to be good looking if they had actually performed like dogs?

    Interesting sub thread: are there any locos people think are really good looking but which were rotten in practice? And vice versa - any locos that looked like dogs, but went like, ahem, the dogs conkers?

    Tom
     
  10. Lplus

    Lplus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2011
    Messages:
    1,919
    Likes Received:
    991
    Location:
    Waiting it out.
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    For the last, how about the SR Q1?
     
  11. flying scotsman123

    flying scotsman123 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    10,437
    Likes Received:
    17,937
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cheltenham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I have absolutely no idea as to its performance, I can't imagine that would influence me much. I knows diddly bob about loco performance for anything...
     
  12. simon

    simon Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2006
    Messages:
    11,567
    Likes Received:
    5,224
    best looking loco?

    GWR 0-4-2 tank.

    Nothing superfluous and nothing missing from a fine looking engine. And one that was more than up to the task.

    Nothing more to be said on the subject.

    :)
     
  13. Matt37401

    Matt37401 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2014
    Messages:
    15,325
    Likes Received:
    11,661
    Occupation:
    Nosy aren’t you?
    Location:
    Nowhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Would the WD 2-8-0/2-10-0 count? I wouldn't say that they're ugly. In fact Id say they have a nice look to them, but get them above 25mph! As for good looking but not so good how about the K4's? Again not bad looking but they had a reputation for being 'a wee bit rattly'.
     
  14. Sir Nigel Gresley

    Sir Nigel Gresley Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2006
    Messages:
    880
    Likes Received:
    148
    Occupation:
    Retired Soldier of Fortune
    Location:
    Dorset
  15. Sir Nigel Gresley

    Sir Nigel Gresley Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2006
    Messages:
    880
    Likes Received:
    148
    Occupation:
    Retired Soldier of Fortune
    Location:
    Dorset
    .. and another contender:

    10 001.jpg

    Note the valve gear for the inside cylinder, on the rear driving wheel.
     
  16. Sir Nigel Gresley

    Sir Nigel Gresley Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2006
    Messages:
    880
    Likes Received:
    148
    Occupation:
    Retired Soldier of Fortune
    Location:
    Dorset
    And my final contender:

    19626 DR 18 201 Pxxxx ausf Pößneck 080592 19920508-13.jpg
     
  17. 242A1

    242A1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,558
    Likes Received:
    1,299
    Tom makes a very valid point. Also it depends on the areas of the steam locomotive that attract the interest of the individual onlooker. A bit of an example. Take the A4 design. Some like the design in original form with single chimney exhaust, they really cannot take to the double chimney version. Others don't mind either form. I understand the development of the design but really only really appreciate the double chimney form but this appreciation owes nothing to looks but rather to the fact that it is by far the superior system.
    This is all eye of the beholder stuff in the main. Few on this forum I suspect would find a 141R to be better looking than a British 5MT (choose your exact type in accordance with your own individual regional or company preferences). Well, yes, I'll vote for the R. Why? Because it contains a range of features and mechanical advances not to be found on our indigenous product.
    I can look at L D Porta's proposed triple expansion 2-10-0 and be hugely enthusiastic but can be equally enthusiastic about Haydock C because of what it represents in terms of the development of the piston valve.
    As to locomotives just having pleasing aesthetic lines, well some just do. But my taste in line might not be yours. And the reverse is also true.
     
  18. John Petley

    John Petley Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2007
    Messages:
    2,848
    Likes Received:
    2,360
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Researcher/writer and composer of classical music
    Location:
    Between LBSCR 221 and LBSCR 227
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    LBSCR B2s spring to mind. Your comments about LSWR 330 in aprevious post were (presumably) in jext, but Drummond did managed to improve the appearance of his 4-6-0s but not the performance!
     
    Jamessquared likes this.
  19. 49010

    49010 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2012
    Messages:
    1,219
    Likes Received:
    995
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Gentleman of Leisure
    Location:
    Stockport
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Hmmm, from the earlier era the B12/3 is a good looker, I'd also throw in Robinsons Jersey Lily Atlantics too.

    OK, OK, I confess a bias towards the products of Gorton, being one myself....

    From later engines you can't beat a rebuilt Scot / Patriot (same engines really).

    Oh and any Big, Ugly Freight Loco.....
     
  20. pete2hogs

    pete2hogs Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2007
    Messages:
    721
    Likes Received:
    418
    Very difficult. My favourites? Stirling Single, Smellie Big Bogie, GER Super Claud (especially the two Royal Clauds in peak LNER condition). LNER V2, A3 in late BR condition, B1 and B12/3 - and as a wild card GW 15xx. And the humble J17 and J39.

    But there are so many! I even quite like the Thompson Pacifics - much more than those who had to maintain them, anyway.

    It'd be harder to list locos I find really ugly. The previously mentioned Drummond 330's. Original Royal Scots (I quite like Patriots, though). The L&YR 0-8-0's and 2-6-2 tanks. Not really a fan of the P2 in any of their various forms. Most of the early LNWR compounds look wrong, but I have an affection for the 3-cyl 0-8-0's. Crab's, Standards, etc that some people hate I don't mind at all.
     

Share This Page