If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Bressingham/ELR/NRM Spin-off Discussion from 6100 Thread

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by M5., Sep 3, 2015.

  1. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    27,790
    Likes Received:
    64,454
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Different Gladstone. To paraphrase the great Eric Morecambe, "it's got all the right wheels, but not necessarily in the right order..."

    Tom
     
    Bean-counter likes this.
  2. Bramblewick

    Bramblewick Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2010
    Messages:
    736
    Likes Received:
    200
    As a matter of interest, are the MoSI engines and stock now part of the National Collection, or do they fall under a separate heading?
     
  3. Miff

    Miff Part of the furniture Friend

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2008
    Messages:
    3,000
    Likes Received:
    3,023
    Despite its name 'National Museums Merseyside' is not part of a national body although it does receive government funding. 'National Museum' is a status not an organisation.
     
  4. Bramblewick

    Bramblewick Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2010
    Messages:
    736
    Likes Received:
    200
    Every day's a school day. So essentially Cecil Raikes and Lion are no more part of a 'national collection' than any other council owned loco, such as 73050 or Sutton or Mr. Therm?
     
  5. Martin Perry

    Martin Perry Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    16,551
    Likes Received:
    7,897
    Location:
    1012 / 60158
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Even more so when there is no damaged crank axle to replace the one suggested to be taken from 35029.
     
  6. Peter Hall

    Peter Hall Guest

    The most recent 'Locomotives and rolling stock in the National Collection' listing I have in my files is 'Issue 3 dated 1st October 2014'. The only item of rolling stock at the MOSI listed as being part of the National Collection is the 1929 built replica of NOVELTY (1929-866). These lists are compiled by the Senior Curator - Rail Vehicle Collections and I am aware more recent versions do exist. Obtaining these though is akin to the oft used phrase concerning stones and blood. The NRM appears unwilling to have a pdf version accessible through its website, persisting with a very inaccurate 'Locomotives and Rolling Stock' section http://www.nrm.org.uk/OurCollection/LocomotivesAndRollingStock.aspx on its website which as far as I can establish is an excellent example of a government IT project that has gone badly wrong and no one appears to be able to correct.

    Past dialogue with the Senior Curator - Rail Vehicle Collections revealed that merging of collections to form the National Collection has not in the past been a priority and consequentially miss-understandings have arisen as to what does and does not constitute the National Collection. The above mentioned NOVELTY is probably an example, as with a 1929-xxxx accession number this almost certainly was once part of the Science Museum collection. Not all railway rolling stock items in that collection passed over to the National Collection from 1975 onwards.

    Merging the MOSI collection with the National Collection is probably something that should be done but is not considered a priority at present.
     
    Bramblewick likes this.
  7. marshall5

    marshall5 Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2010
    Messages:
    2,521
    Likes Received:
    4,359
    Location:
    i.o.m
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Cecil Raikes was, IIRC, on John Scholes' original list drawn up for BTC in the 50's. This list formed the basis of our present "National Collection" and Cecil was presented to the BTC by the NCB was is it not? At some point, the details of which I've never discovered, 'ownership' seems to have been transferred to the, then, Liverpool City Council - it was in the City Engineers depot by the mid 60's.
    Surely some documentation must exist that details these changes of ownership. IMHO Cecil has been sadly neglected by its present 'custodians'
    Ray.
     
  8. Ian Riley

    Ian Riley Part of the furniture Loco Owner

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2005
    Messages:
    2,422
    Likes Received:
    470


    Rubbish!..as the CME of the ELR at the time and perpetrator of such changes, the livery and name changes were made with the blessing of the Bressingham hierarchy, (not David Ward I might add).......do you honestly think they would have allowed such if they did not approve, I mean, come on![/QUOTE]
     
    black5, 26D_M and std tank like this.
  9. LMS2968

    LMS2968 Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Messages:
    3,072
    Likes Received:
    5,361
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Lecturer retired: Archivist of Stanier Mogul Fund
    Location:
    Wigan
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I apologise, Ian, but I read it somewhere, but at this passage of time, I've no idea where. Although the memory isn't what it was, it's pretty accurate on some things and this is one: I didn't make it up. As I said, certain sources worked on the usual journalistic approach of not letting the truth get in the way of a good story; I assume that was part of it.

    To be fair, I did check - after the event, it's true - with a more reliable source and conceded the point. All I can say, once again, is apoligies for my misunderstanding.
     
  10. 8A Rail

    8A Rail Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2006
    Messages:
    277
    Likes Received:
    49
    Location:
    Merseyside
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Ian is correct with the above, no doubt about it. The loco (6233) was also temporary numbered & named 46247 "City of Liverpool" for a couple of hours too although some small technical / appearance differences between the loco's but it was a little bit of fun seeing both 46246 and 46247! Just realise that was 22 years ago next week and little did we realise that we would see 6233 back on the mainline at that time!
     
  11. 26D_M

    26D_M Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,416
    Likes Received:
    1,681
    Some mock wooden smoke deflectors were made as I recall. Not sure where the name and number plates came from or where they are now.
    As said before certainly don't recollect any discord about the initiative emanating from the Bressingham end, it was all very consensual.
     
  12. 8A Rail

    8A Rail Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2006
    Messages:
    277
    Likes Received:
    49
    Location:
    Merseyside
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Yes, mock wooden smoke deflectors were made. As for the numbers / nameplates - IR had them made for 46246 (aluminium numberplate and brass nameplate) and I had 46247 aluminium number plate and wooden mock nameplate made which I still have now. Along with some suitable tape and some black overlay's on some parts of loco, it looked convincing enough. But it was enjoyable, a bit of fun and was not to be taken too seriously either but all above board! May be I dig out the images sometime.
     
  13. 26D_M

    26D_M Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,416
    Likes Received:
    1,681
    Cheers Doug, I acted as shunter and set a few rags alight for smoke effect from the chimney. Seem to remember one Manchester nameplate in the works office for a while ......
     
  14. Matt37401

    Matt37401 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2014
    Messages:
    15,551
    Likes Received:
    11,955
    Location:
    Wnxx
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Didnt it pose as 46225 with 71000 at some point too?
     

Share This Page