If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

British 8 coupled loco's

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by johnofwessex, Feb 16, 2020.

  1. andrewshimmin

    andrewshimmin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Messages:
    1,663
    Likes Received:
    1,939
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Very handsome, too.

    Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk
     
    Dag Bonnedal likes this.
  2. Wenlock

    Wenlock Well-Known Member Friend

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    1,734
    Likes Received:
    1,041
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Bus Driver
    Location:
    Loughton Essex
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Indeed not only is the coal space base higher on the 'scuttle' type bunker, but the overhang starts lower down. 7200 Trust quote 2,700 gallons of water and 5 tons coal, I have seen elsewhere a coal capacity of 4 tons shown for this type, the same as an unmodified 5205.
    The only drawing I have is in a 1946 book, it shows 7200 with the original capacities as listed by @Jamessquared.
     
  3. Railcar22

    Railcar22 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2007
    Messages:
    235
    Likes Received:
    22
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Stock Control
    Location:
    Slough
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The 7200 trust do quote coal capacity as beeing 4 tons
    However this site quotes 6 tones http://www.greatwestern.org.uk/m_in_282.htm
    Wikkipedia quotes 6 ton, although we know inacurate they can be https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GWR_7200_Cla
    The site run by the group restoring 7202 state the capacity as 6 tons, however the last batch of converesions have less coal capacity of 5 tons , and a little more water capacity of 2,700 gallons as opposed to 2,500 gallons and 6 tons http://www.baldric.plus.com/7202/72xxspec.htm
     
  4. Wenlock

    Wenlock Well-Known Member Friend

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    1,734
    Likes Received:
    1,041
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Bus Driver
    Location:
    Loughton Essex
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Photos of 7202 and 7229 show the earlier shape of bunker, made obvious if you look at the line of rivets where the water space is separated from the coal space. Of course so much sheet steel will have needed replacement after 60 years out of service that 7200 may emerge from rebuilding with either type of bunker.
     
  5. Wenlock

    Wenlock Well-Known Member Friend

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    1,734
    Likes Received:
    1,041
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Bus Driver
    Location:
    Loughton Essex
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The biggest problem researching anything on the web, is that you don't know what original sources the compiler of a website has used. All too easy to take inaccurate data from one website when compiling another.
    This is why history books normally have a list of original sources for factual information.
     
    Last edited: May 3, 2020
    jnc and LMS2968 like this.
  6. MG 7305

    MG 7305 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2009
    Messages:
    84
    Likes Received:
    98
    If in doubt go to the RCTS "The Locomotives of the Great Western Railway". In this case Part 9, Standard Two-Cylinder Classes. Here we have:

    upload_2020-5-3_12-28-15.png

    Best regards

    Julian
     
  7. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    20,937
    Likes Received:
    38,638
    Location:
    215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I guess my point was - in relation to a rebuild of the 42xx class, by time you have got 6 tons of coal into a bunker, there is not much advantage in having a tender, since the coal-limited range is already such that it is likely more than one crew could burn in a day's shift. (Six tons of coal at 50lb per mile with a half ton unburnt allowance for prudence gives a range of 245 miles, which at 20mph is already 12 hours). So understandable why rebuilt as tank engines rather than go the extra expense of increasing the stock of tenders. The primary advantage of having made them into tender engines would seem to me to have been related to braking capacity, not primarily fuel and water capacity.

    Tom
     
    Steve likes this.
  8. Wenlock

    Wenlock Well-Known Member Friend

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    1,734
    Likes Received:
    1,041
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Bus Driver
    Location:
    Loughton Essex
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Since the bunker/rear tank fitted to 7200 (Diagram A) on arrival at Quainton Rd. is distinctly different to those shown on photos of 7202 (also Diagram A) and 7229 (Diagram B), I believe it must at some stage have been rebuilt with a bunker as fitted to the third batch (Diagram C) locos.
     
  9. marshall5

    marshall5 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2010
    Messages:
    1,740
    Likes Received:
    2,112
    Location:
    i.o.m
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I didn't know that the 72xx had three different bunker types, perhaps some knowledgeable person could explain any visual differences?
    If it's any help I've attached photos of 7229 and 7202 at Barry in 1969 and 1970 respectively.
    Ray.
    02-69-15 7229 Barry Aug 30 1969.jpg 02-70-05 7202  Barry Aug 1970.jpg
     
  10. MG 7305

    MG 7305 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2009
    Messages:
    84
    Likes Received:
    98
    Welcome to GWR standardisation and swapping of (sometimes quite large) components. What is clear is that the GWR decided that the balance between coal and water carried was imperfect and changed it somewhat between the second and third batches. After that one needs to have confirmed dated photographic (or physical!) evidence of any given locomotive at any one time. The myriad detail improvements, changes and reversions made by the GWR to their locomotives makes any attempt to track them a sure way to madness. The RM Web fora have many threads trying to prove one thing or another. Reverting to the RCTS series, the recording of the early swapping of boiler types on, for example, the Stars and Saints is but a taster.

    Best regards

    Julian
     
    jnc likes this.
  11. Wenlock

    Wenlock Well-Known Member Friend

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    1,734
    Likes Received:
    1,041
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Bus Driver
    Location:
    Loughton Essex
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    image.jpeg
    I too am no expert on GWR matters, however this photo from the Buckinghamshire Railway Centre Stockbook website shows the difference.
     
  12. std tank

    std tank Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Messages:
    3,551
    Likes Received:
    704
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Liverpool
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    See Irwell Press 2-8-2 Tank Papers. No date is given, but 7200 and 7201 were rebuilt with the later bunker. Originally the first two batches 7200 -7219 and 7220-7239 both had the same bunker, but there were other detail difference, such as the running boards over the cylinders. However, this difference was altered to the original on some of the second batch 7220-7239.
     
    marshall5 likes this.
  13. pmh_74

    pmh_74 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    Messages:
    1,761
    Likes Received:
    878
    Well, that's quite fun. So in a class with 3 survivors, all 3 appear to be unique!
     
  14. Jimc

    Jimc Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    3,238
    Likes Received:
    3,102
    Occupation:
    Once computers, now part time writer I suppose.
    Location:
    SE England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I'm not sure how many different configs there are amongst the surviving Castles, but there are two frame designs, and at least three boiler types.

    GW standardisation aimed for interchangeable parts at shopping rather than every locomotive identical.
     
  15. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    20,937
    Likes Received:
    38,638
    Location:
    215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I’m wondering if, once you take into account different boilers, bunkers, sandbox positions, chimneys, cylinder sizes and so on, whether any of the ten surviving Terriers is identical to any of the others.

    Tom
     
  16. Steve

    Steve Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2006
    Messages:
    10,423
    Likes Received:
    7,116
    Occupation:
    Gentleman of leisure, nowadays
    Location:
    Near Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Well I'm convinced no two surviving Black 5's are alike, especially in the detail.
     
  17. LMS2968

    LMS2968 Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,622
    Likes Received:
    3,747
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Lecturer retired: Archivist of Stanier Mogul Fund
    Location:
    Wigan
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    That was probably true in BR days, too!
     
  18. Jimc

    Jimc Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    3,238
    Likes Received:
    3,102
    Occupation:
    Once computers, now part time writer I suppose.
    Location:
    SE England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    so the challenge is now to name a class of at least 3 where the survivors are all identical [grin]
     
    S.A.C. Martin likes this.
  19. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    20,937
    Likes Received:
    38,638
    Location:
    215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I was going to say the four Wainwright Ps, but I think 753 (the KESR one) has a taller cab.

    What about the 80xxx tanks - was there much variation in those?

    Tom
     
  20. Steve

    Steve Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2006
    Messages:
    10,423
    Likes Received:
    7,116
    Occupation:
    Gentleman of leisure, nowadays
    Location:
    Near Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I've experience of 80072, 80135 & 80136 and I can't think of any real difference. However, when 80135 eventually goes back into service it will have TPWS, GSMR & AWS so it will be somewhat different from the other two.
     

Share This Page