If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

David Morgan - Railway Magazine, June 2009 issue.

Discussion in 'The Railway Magazine' started by Eightpot, May 7, 2009.

  1. Eightpot

    Eightpot Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2006
    Messages:
    8,086
    Likes Received:
    2,270
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Engineer Emeritus
    Location:
    Aylesbury
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Not entirely sure if this is under the correct heading, but anyway,

    He states, and I quote:- "Weekend travel in the UK is fraught with difficulties, but that can be part of the challenge. So why is this relevant to heritage railways? Well, a European Union directive, if enacted, will require train operators to pay penal costs of compensation to passengers travelling over 50 kilometers or more should the train be more than 30 minutes late. I have not yet seen the directive yet but I am told that the operator is liable regardless of blame and has no right of recovery against the third party who caused the delay. While no heritage railway (at present) exceeds 50 kilometers,most steam charters over the main line do."

    Does anyone know the reference number of this proposed directive?

    At this stage I 'll just confine myself to saying, and on the assumption that it will emerge into law, that if I was a railway tour operator I'd seriously be considering a cessation of such a business.
     
    Eightpot, May 7, 2009
    #1
  2. Guest

    Guest Part of the furniture Account Suspended

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    3,614
    Likes Received:
    21
    Occupation:
    Occasional
    Location:
    G C & N S
    Richard

    The operating TOC would pick that up.

    The charterer is not the operator - although he does pay the overall bill
     
    Guest, May 7, 2009
    #2
  3. Eightpot

    Eightpot Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2006
    Messages:
    8,086
    Likes Received:
    2,270
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Engineer Emeritus
    Location:
    Aylesbury
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Frank, that may be so, but would the TOC want to risk being in the position of having to pick it up unnecessarily?
     
    Eightpot, May 8, 2009
    #3
  4. John Elliot Jnr

    John Elliot Jnr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2007
    Messages:
    1,233
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Museum curator
    Location:
    71A
    My initial reaction is that this might be something that drops out of the opening up of EU railways to increased cross-border competition. But I don't know that to be the case and it's far too late to go looking for it... :smt015
     
    John Elliot Jnr, May 8, 2009
    #4
  5. nanstallon

    nanstallon Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,323
    Likes Received:
    2,397
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Westcountry
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Is this going to hit TOCs who dump their pax onto buses at weekends? Sauce for the goose ...

    John
     
    nanstallon, May 8, 2009
    #5
  6. Guest

    Guest Part of the furniture Account Suspended

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    3,614
    Likes Received:
    21
    Occupation:
    Occasional
    Location:
    G C & N S
    It all depends on how you quantify late, of course.

    A revised timetable accounting for blockades and bustitution would not be "late" even if you were two hours longer than a normal journey en route, but on time as per the revised schedule.

    Equally - continental railways haven't adopted the barmy British NR / TOCs model.

    On the continent the industry operator would pick up the tab - here NR would indemnify itself against claims in its access contracts, sit back, and laugh!
     
    Guest, May 8, 2009
    #6
  7. richards

    richards Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2008
    Messages:
    4,636
    Likes Received:
    1,928
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I've moved this whole thread into the "Railway Magazine" forum.

    Richard
     
    richards, May 8, 2009
    #7
  8. 73129

    73129 Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2007
    Messages:
    4,500
    Likes Received:
    1,094
    Location:
    Winchester
    Hi I can't find Railway Magazine forum can someone please point me in the right direction.


    Thanks
     
    73129, May 8, 2009
    #8
  9. richards

    richards Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2008
    Messages:
    4,636
    Likes Received:
    1,928
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    73129 - this is still the right place for posting. But the discussion is now listed in the RM forum.

    If you want to find the other threads in this forum, click on this link:
    http://railways.national-preservation.com/viewforum.php?f=96
    or use the "Board Index" at the top of this page, and then scroll to the bottom where you'll find the Media Corner section. This has forums for Railway Magazine, Steam Railway, Heritage Railway and the NRM. Hope this helps.

    Richard
     
    richards, May 8, 2009
    #9
  10. southyorkshireman

    southyorkshireman Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2005
    Messages:
    6,558
    Likes Received:
    34
    Location:
    Rotherham 41D or Metropolitan Railway boardroom
    Richard, you fell for that one hook line and sinker!
     
    southyorkshireman, May 8, 2009
    #10

Share This Page