If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Industrial Loco Updates

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by AlistairS, Apr 17, 2008.

  1. clinker

    clinker Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2016
    Messages:
    569
    Likes Received:
    348
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    romford
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer


    It's a funny kind of thing but the uses of Sentinels on Road and Rail are entirely different, on the road they are something of a 'Hotrod' leaving Traction engines behind and confusing the TE owners, but on Rail they tend to be yard shunters and similar, Unfortunately due to the different uses some loco's have lost their engines and boilers to Road Waggons.
     
  2. meeee

    meeee Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    864
    Likes Received:
    1,319
    I think you have to consider more things than just cost and reliability on a preserved railway. One of the big issues is crew familiarity. On the F&WHR 95% of trains are now crewed by volunteers. Having one loco on a different system can throw up all sorts of problems. Especially when some crews are only doing 10 days a year.

    The gas producer system on Linda in the 80s worked really well. The system is especially good for locos working right on the steaming limit like Linda. One of the things that scuppered it was that the railway moved away from regular paid crews, and relied more on volunteers. So the regulars had it going like a rocket one day, and then someone unfamiliar would get on and cock it up completely.

    So there's a balancing act. Gas producer works well, especially if you have poor quality coal and hard working locos. But if does have downsides especially if you're adding another variable to a complicated loco fleet.

    Some of the NGG16a modifications are incoprated on the WHR though. Master mechanics spark arrestors for example. 87 also has the lempor exhaust and improved steam pipes. Most people don't seem to think it makes much difference though.

    Tim
     
    Hirn, ragl, Miff and 2 others like this.
  3. Respite

    Respite Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2009
    Messages:
    421
    Likes Received:
    117
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Many thanks to those who have replied to my question about firebar damage and overheating ashpans.
     
  4. peckett

    peckett Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2006
    Messages:
    726
    Likes Received:
    549
    Are the ashpans quoted above dowsed with cold water after fire cleaning to stop ash flying about , its a horrible job when the winds in the wrong direction ,I 've seen men covered in white ash from top to toe. However water dowsing was banned by the loco foreman who said it warped the ash pan plates. The ash pans were home made in the blacksmiths shop ,blacksmith also had something to say when he saw it being done. The foreman moved on, and ash pan swilling out became the norm, it did make some difference ,the sliding plate on the floor /bottom of the ashpan became bent and warped making it not usable. It was, before then ,slid out for fire cleaning.
     
  5. Steve

    Steve Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2006
    Messages:
    11,930
    Likes Received:
    10,088
    Occupation:
    Gentleman of leisure, nowadays
    Location:
    Near Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    A conversation elsewhere has reminded me that the Hunslet Austerity locomotives fitted with mechanical stokers also had a gas producer system installed which piped steam from the stoker into the ashpan. There was also a takeoff from the blastpipe into the ashpan and a supply of live steam controlled by the regulator handle which was open when the regulator was shut. The purpose of all these was to give a relatively cool firebed so, arguably, introducing steam into the ashpan was a Hunslet approved modification.
     
    ragl and 2392 like this.
  6. sleepermonster

    sleepermonster Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2007
    Messages:
    918
    Likes Received:
    1,024
    Bagnall 2746 The Duke

    LMS report further progress: the last of the sling stays has been fitted to the firebox crown, enabling fitting of the internal steam pipes from the dome to the backhead. The regulator rod, valve and gland have been remade and should be steam tightThe new front tubeplate is ready to fit and will be put into place after the New Year. Meanwhile, our latest fundraising effort has arrived; a van from Dapol, in the livery of Joseph Miller & Co, Flour Producers and Importers of Old Windmill Sidings, Buggleskelly. The theory is that the principal villain One Eyed Joe eventually got released from jail and set up a business which was entirely legitimate.......or was it?
     

    Attached Files:

  7. sleepermonster

    sleepermonster Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2007
    Messages:
    918
    Likes Received:
    1,024
    Bagnall 2746 The Duke

    A foretaste for 2021. I dropped off some parts at LMS yesterday. Here is a picture of the new front tubeplate, ready to be fitted next week. Note how the rim has been flatted and polished to give that perfect metal to metal fit.
     

    Attached Files:

  8. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,099
    Likes Received:
    57,414
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    One of the lesser known Bluebell locos is the Avonside 0-6-0T "Stamford". This was acquired at a time of loco shortage in the early 1970s, but fortunes turned round and it never ran at the Bluebell - for more than twenty years it has been on loan to Rocks by Rail. As the locomotive doesn't meet our core collection policy, the Bluebell has decided to sell the locomotive to Rocks By Rail, which is a far more suitable home - "Stamford" is one of only a small handful of quarry steam locomotives that worked in the ironstone quarries in Rutland to survive into railway preservation.

    More information about how to help here: https://www.rocks-by-rail.org/blog/

    Tom
     
  9. sleepermonster

    sleepermonster Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2007
    Messages:
    918
    Likes Received:
    1,024
    Bsgnall 2746 The Duke

    The new front tubeplate has been fitted and rivetted; tubing will follow shortly.
     
  10. Alex G

    Alex G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    140
    Likes Received:
    93
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Swansea
    Some news from Blaenavon.

    The chassis from Andrew Barclay 2074 Llantarnam Abbey has gone to West Somerset Restoration at Williton for overhaul and should be back with us within 18 months.

    The boiler has been removed from RSH 7169 Mech Navvies for inspection and assessment to see what will be required for its overhaul.

    Alex.
     
    26D_M, 3855, Matt78 and 1 other person like this.
  11. Steve

    Steve Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2006
    Messages:
    11,930
    Likes Received:
    10,088
    Occupation:
    Gentleman of leisure, nowadays
    Location:
    Near Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    At Middleton HL 3860 (Swanscombe No.6) has been in steam today, the first time since 1975. A surprisingly short snagging list to add to the list of jobs known to be still outstanding.
    IMG_1111.JPEG
     
  12. Richard Roper

    Richard Roper Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    1,310
    Likes Received:
    1,355
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Librarian
    Location:
    Just up the road from 56E Sowerby Bridge
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Now that looks really nice! Good to see a nice bright industrial livery in these dark times.

    Richard.:)
     
  13. 5944

    5944 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2006
    Messages:
    8,031
    Likes Received:
    7,605
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Train Maintainer for GTR at Hornsey
    Location:
    Letchworth
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    When you say Swanscombe no. 6... Is that the real no. 6, or just the tank from no. 6 fitted to whatever loco was in the works at the time?
     
  14. ruddingtonrsh56

    ruddingtonrsh56 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2009
    Messages:
    979
    Likes Received:
    1,470
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Nottinghamshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Or is it the frame of no.6 with whatever tank was in the works at the time?
     
  15. Wenlock

    Wenlock Well-Known Member Friend

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    2,027
    Likes Received:
    1,319
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Bus Driver
    Location:
    Loughton Essex
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I see it now has standard sized buffer-heads rather than the 'dustbin lids' used at Swanscombe. I always thought those were very distinctive of the class.
     
  16. Wenlock

    Wenlock Well-Known Member Friend

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    2,027
    Likes Received:
    1,319
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Bus Driver
    Location:
    Loughton Essex
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The identity of any loco is always debatable from the first major overhaul onwards. It depends on the owning company's policy whether identity lies with the frames , the boiler or some other definition.

    APCM Swanscombe used to refer to the locos by their painted numbers I believe. Any loco which has been overhauled several times is likely to have parts stamped with the build numbers of various class members.
     
  17. IndustrialSteamLeeds

    IndustrialSteamLeeds Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2008
    Messages:
    534
    Likes Received:
    220
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Kirkstall Forge
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The same buffers with the bin lids removed. They were removed due to been damage from its days at Swanscombe .
     
  18. IndustrialSteamLeeds

    IndustrialSteamLeeds Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2008
    Messages:
    534
    Likes Received:
    220
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Kirkstall Forge
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I'm told the loco number stayed with the boiler.
    The reverser quadrant is off 3171 no.3 (off the top of my head).
    There is picture evidence that the tank was once on number 3 at some point during its life too.

    Edit. Swanscombe was notorious when it came to using bits off other locos and not putting them back on the same loco.
     
    Wenlock likes this.
  19. Steve

    Steve Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2006
    Messages:
    11,930
    Likes Received:
    10,088
    Occupation:
    Gentleman of leisure, nowadays
    Location:
    Near Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The loco that Middelton acquired from APCM in 1971 was No.6, according to the paperwork and the worksplate carried. That's the starting point. It is definitely the boiler that was supplied when the loco was new from Hawthorn Leslie in 1935; their works number 3860. I believe that the worksplates were kept with the boiler but offer no evidence that this was the case. It is well known that parts were swapped around between locos at Swanscombe. The handrail on the tank that accompanied the loco when delivered to Middleton was bent quite distinctively over the smokebox and there is photographic evidence that this tank was once on a loco which carried No. 4 on it. (It now has a new tank so this bit of history is gone.)

    The IRS handbook for 1969 gives the following loco list
    HL 3715 - No.2
    HL 3716 - No.1
    HL 3717 - No.6
    HL 3718 - No.4
    HL 3719 - No.5
    HL 3860 - No.3
    I presume that this list was derived by comparing the worksplates with the number painted on the saddletank at that time.

    As to which bits are on the loco now, it is a mix of the majority of the Swanscombe locos; I have found bits from 3715, 3716, 3717 & 3719. The valve gear is a spares order supplied by RSH so carries the spares order number. I suspect that the frames are from 3717 but this would upset those at Quainton as they claim to have this loco and I also have no positive proof of this; its just the fact that this loco is in the majority when you look at the many bits and add them together. I believe the owner of Swanscombe No.4 believes his loco is actually more No.5. I have never investigated No.1, the fourth surviving Swanscmbe loco.

    The large round buffer heads have been removed although the buffers are the original.. It was decided to remove them as they were quite bent and mis-shaped and their removal would make it much easier for crews to couple up; ducking under the large heads was quite difficult to do.
     
    ragl and 2392 like this.
  20. marshall5

    marshall5 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2010
    Messages:
    2,375
    Likes Received:
    3,981
    Location:
    i.o.m
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    For anyone interested Peckett 1903 (at Chatham Historic Dockyard?) is advertised for sale on Traction Talk. " For sale is Peckett m5 0-4-0 1903 currently has no boiler ticket. " For more details and photos email: hedges989@googlemail.com
    I have no connection with the loco or seller, just passing on the info. Looks like a nice little loco.
    Ray.
     

Share This Page