If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Marples and Beeching

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by GWR4707, Jan 8, 2020.

  1. GWR4707

    GWR4707 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    18,046
    Likes Received:
    15,736
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cumbria
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Couldn't think where else to put this, its quite an interesting read..

    https://twitter.com/TurnipRail/status/1214524091484528640
     
    35B likes this.
  2. 30567

    30567 Part of the furniture Friend

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2012
    Messages:
    5,610
    Likes Received:
    3,510
    Thanks for posting. No surprises there, this is the standard economic history line really. It was under Watkinson that the decision was taken that the motorways would not be designed as toll roads. That was a crucial decision which reverberates to this day. Not saying it was wrong, but the terms of trade for the M1, 4,5 and 6 were determined at least five years before Marples came on the scene.

    I expect @Bulleid Pacific knows Dr Turner, being of the York mafia.
     
  3. W.Williams

    W.Williams Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2015
    Messages:
    1,585
    Likes Received:
    1,465
    Occupation:
    Mechanical Engineer
    Location:
    Aberdeenshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Provides considerable evidence to a number of the charges discussed in the Thread I started on this last year.

    Might one suggest a move to that thread Admins?
     
  4. Bulleid Pacific

    Bulleid Pacific Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    3,991
    Likes Received:
    1,039
    Occupation:
    A Thingy...
    Indeed, I do.
     
  5. Martin Perry

    Martin Perry Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    16,510
    Likes Received:
    7,753
    Location:
    1012 / 60158
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Can you send a link please.
     
  6. JohnElliott

    JohnElliott New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2014
    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    89
    Gender:
    Male
    Twitter really isn't the 1/
    best medium for writing 2/
    or reading a long, cohe 3/
    rently stated argument. /ends
     
  7. DismalChips

    DismalChips Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2016
    Messages:
    636
    Likes Received:
    657
    Location:
    9A
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    At least he didn't start it with something like "BUCKLE UP, BITCHES, YOU THOUGHT YOU KNOW MARPLES BUT GUESS WHAT"
     
    andrewshimmin likes this.
  8. Cartman

    Cartman Well-Known Member Account Suspended

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2015
    Messages:
    2,290
    Likes Received:
    1,672
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Van driver
    Location:
    Cheshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Still think Marples is quite possibly the only man in the whole of world history who was even more bent than Sepp Blatter
     
  9. DismalChips

    DismalChips Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2016
    Messages:
    636
    Likes Received:
    657
    Location:
    9A
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Have you seen who's president?
     
    Last edited: Jan 9, 2020
    andrewshimmin and Cartman like this.
  10. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    25,493
    Likes Received:
    23,730
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Then you've yet to read one of Tom Bower's biographies - I recommend that of Ecclestone. Marples was a corrupt sh1t, but no more than a large scale spiv. You have led a very sheltered life if you think him that bad.
     
    paullad1984 likes this.
  11. jnc

    jnc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2012
    Messages:
    1,511
    Likes Received:
    2,706
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Western Atlantic
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Can we please keep un-related politics off the rail areas of NatPres? Something relevant, e.g. rail funding, sure (hence the "un-related"), but if one political post is OK, more will follow, polluting the forum. Thanks.

    Noel
     
    35B and paulhitch like this.
  12. domeyhead

    domeyhead Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2007
    Messages:
    396
    Likes Received:
    161
    I agree with Dr Turner's summary but as others say this is not new news to any half keen rail historian, and not sure why he felt the need to deal with it via the medium of Twitter! It reminds me of the Monty Python "Summarise Proust" game show in which contestants had to precis A La recherche du Temps Perdu in 30 seconds! Someone should tell the Doctor about blogs.
     
    jnc likes this.
  13. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,103
    Likes Received:
    57,432
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I think (I haven’t compared word for word) that that thread is identical to the (single!) thread he posted on Facebook. Slightly surprised he didn’t just use twitter to reference the FB article, but maybe he feels he has different followers or levels of engagement on the two platforms - I’m not a social media guru.

    Anyway, back to the subject at hand rather than drift off into the uses of social media by academic historians!

    Tom
     
    jnc likes this.
  14. johnofwessex

    johnofwessex Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2015
    Messages:
    9,185
    Likes Received:
    7,226
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Thorn in my managers side
    Location:
    72
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Its worth pointing out that apart from EMU's on The Southern the first series production Inter City MU's - the Blue Pullman & HST's were effectivley loco & coaches but semi permanently coupled. It wasnt until the Voyagers came along that you got a true high speed multiple unit
     
    MellishR and S.A.C. Martin like this.
  15. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    25,493
    Likes Received:
    23,730
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    High speed, yes, but there were some (TransPennine, cl. 126) underfloor DMUs in "inter city" use before then.
     
  16. Spamcan81

    Spamcan81 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Messages:
    35,121
    Likes Received:
    20,773
    Occupation:
    Training moles
    Location:
    The back of beyond
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Class 124 IIRC.
    And Swindon built some "Inter-City" dmu types - Class 126? - for use in Scotland and elsewhere. I don't think you could call them high speed though.
     
  17. 30854

    30854 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2017
    Messages:
    12,172
    Likes Received:
    11,493
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Brighton&Hove
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    You'd have needed a very good crystal ball indeed to see that coming back in the 1930s. Even today, it's an observation still only applicable to passenger and (for now, at least, a few) parcels workings.

    I do occasionally wonder that decarbonisation / electrification might mean for container, bulk minerals and other trainllad traffic. It may make sense for wagons to be capable of moving (and possibly shunting) themselves, under remote (centralised?) computer control. Were that to happen, would a locomotive (or even a driver) even be needed? My guess would be 'yes' to something akin to a loco, but effectively only a unit to access OHLE over the core rail network, manage the wagons' onboard systems, such as the recharge (OHLE or regen) of depleted cells on wagons.

    Before throwing your arms up in horror. I doubt there's currently a suitable battery architecture to do this (though Toyota have now cracked commercial scale 'solid state' batteries*), consider ...... If it did eventually happen, certain classes of wagonload goods might even become viable again. That would change the economics of more than a few marginal routes.

    *first solid state battery EV model from Toyota estimated to go on sale in 2024
     
  18. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    25,493
    Likes Received:
    23,730
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    We're going way OT, but some points are worth note:
    1. there are already freight multiple units around, able to take container loads - Network Rail have used them for sandite/deicing for several years now
    2. The economics of converting lightweight load carrying wagons into self propelled vehicles would be very questionable as axle loads rose and/or payloads reduced, and maintenance regimes had to change
    3. There is a rule of thumb about loco haulage that suggests the break even point for cost efficiency is at about 5-6 carriages, with longer trains more cost effective as loco + LHCS rather than as a multiple unit.
     
    S.A.C. Martin likes this.
  19. 30854

    30854 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2017
    Messages:
    12,172
    Likes Received:
    11,493
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Brighton&Hove
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Point zero: Yes, we are rather.
    Point one: True, but a non-revenue funtion
    Point two: Conversion wasn't mentioned, for the very reason you state. I actually had 'next generation' operations firmly in mind
    Point three: Is that still the case? Over the last decade, more formerly hauled passenger services seem to have given way to MU operation, with the odd rake of strategically located carriages in reserve to cover failures. Even sleeper services seem to feature adapted freight loco designs.

    This does actually lead us back to Gresley's options in the 1930s. Diesel railcar sets were one thing, multiple unit control another. The only full-blown pre-war "DMU" I'm aware of was the LMS's 3-car streamlined set, though with only that one set, the capability was less than useful! Open to correction on this point.
     
    MellishR and S.A.C. Martin like this.
  20. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    25,493
    Likes Received:
    23,730
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    ;)
    But using a design developed for revenue traffic
    Noted, but that is a major change of model and cost base
    The 92s that work the sleepers were built for mixed traffic (remember "Nightstar"?); I've heard the figure of 5-6 cars mentioned in the context of drift away from MUs on Trans Pennine and Chiltern, which use reasonably new class 68s.
    No correction, but very valid - what were the available technologies?
     
    S.A.C. Martin likes this.

Share This Page