If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

RAIB Investigation: South Devon Railway

Discussion in 'Heritage Railways & Centres in the UK' started by 35B, Jul 10, 2017.

  1. Monkey Magic

    Monkey Magic Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2018
    Messages:
    3,498
    Likes Received:
    6,845
    Location:
    Here, there, everywhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Isn’t the story of most accidents that systems that should be or are in place to prevent said accident have been ignored or neglected, or a safety culture has come to be eroded. When you look at the accident (thinking also about bigger accidents like Clapham) it isn’t a single act but a whole series of minor and major failings that culminated in a near fatal accident. The major failure was allowing an unfit vehicle to run, but it was also thinking that screwing the door shut would be sufficient (perhaps lesser), not reporting the failure and the accident properly (major). It is almost like a culture of ‘it’ll be alright because there is this backstop’.

    Perhaps the really important lesson is not to take safety for granted and assume that the safety culture is satisfactory. I think if one thing railway history tells us, it is that safety cultures erode silently and unseen until there is an accident.
     
    ghost, jnc, Hampshire Unit and 3 others like this.
  2. Forestpines

    Forestpines Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2009
    Messages:
    1,681
    Likes Received:
    2,438
    Gender:
    Female
    Location:
    Somewhere in the UK
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Thank you for posting. I was at the air show in question myself: all the crowd knew at first was that a plane had come down on the other side of the motorway. It was certainly a very tense moment for all the spectators.
     
  3. toplight

    toplight Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2009
    Messages:
    1,351
    Likes Received:
    1,288
    Location:
    Swindon, England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I think to be honest the pilot makes a bit of a pigs ear of it. You can see in the early part of the video he is heading straight towards Duxford. He then turns to the right and flys the downwind leg before turning left on the base leg beyond the motorway. This is exactly what you would do in normal circumstances but it was too far and he was never going to make it at such a low altitude. (which he doesn't). What he should have done in my opinion was turned left and landed it downwind in the opposite direction down the runway especially as the airfield is pretty big and grass field etc. I understand it wasn't his plane so he was probably hoping the Engine would pick up and run normally.

    As for preserved railways I don't see any parallel, Pilots are trained constantly for Engine failure situations. For me the lack of a toilet floor was almost certainly known about beforehand and the issue was probably just that they had no labour available to repair it. This is the problem with relying on volunteers. Often they aren't there. If I was going to repair that toilet compartment I reckon it would take me at least 5 weeks as I would only be working on it as a volunteer one day per week (ie 5 days work), but often the train is needed straight away. They probably started the job one Sunday and repaired the vacuum pipe and then ran out of time and went home. Next weekend it was running with the job incomplete.

    The only way around that in my opinion is getting some full time C and W staff so any problems can be fully repaired and completed (Monday to Friday) ready for the following weekends running. With volunteers you can't do that as they typically are only able to come say 1 day every 1 or 2 weeks and that is never enough time. That is why restorations take 20 years etc. If it was being done full time then it might only take 2 years.
     
    Last edited: May 23, 2018
  4. Andy Williams

    Andy Williams Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2010
    Messages:
    851
    Likes Received:
    908
    Occupation:
    Design Engineer
    Location:
    Shropshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    If you read the RAIB report, you will find that it was in fact paid staff who carried out the work to the toilet floor/brake system. There is no mention of any volunteer staff being involved. The decision to reinstate the coach with the repairs incomplete was taken for commercial reasons.
     
    deaftech, 35B, jnc and 1 other person like this.
  5. twr12

    twr12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2007
    Messages:
    1,540
    Likes Received:
    692
    Volunteer Directors overruling Paid Staff?
     
  6. nanstallon

    nanstallon Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,323
    Likes Received:
    2,397
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Westcountry
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    How do the lawyers rake up such costs when guilt has already been admitted? Enough has been said about the fine itself, although I think it was harsh. The consequences could have been terrible, but you can say that about many near misses with bad driving on the roads.

    John
     
  7. richards

    richards Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2008
    Messages:
    4,634
    Likes Received:
    1,921
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Their level of pay should not be a factor. Any director (paid or unpaid) should have the knowledge and experience required to take executive decisions, whether this overrules paid staff or not.
     
  8. Steve1015

    Steve1015 Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2011
    Messages:
    902
    Likes Received:
    268
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Paid staff obviously far more knowledgeable and experienced than volunteers...
     
    Last edited: May 23, 2018
    Mogul and Daddsie71b like this.
  9. Wenlock

    Wenlock Well-Known Member Friend

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    2,027
    Likes Received:
    1,319
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Bus Driver
    Location:
    Loughton Essex
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Why "obviously"?

    The volunteer director might have been involved/working in that field for 40 years or more. The paid staff might be a relatively newcomer to railways, perhaps a younger person who can afford to work for lower pay than a more experienced person.
     
    The Dainton Banker likes this.
  10. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    25,492
    Likes Received:
    23,722
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I read @Steve1015 as supporting that view, but through sarcasm
     
    deaftech, Mogul, jnc and 4 others like this.
  11. Wenlock

    Wenlock Well-Known Member Friend

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    2,027
    Likes Received:
    1,319
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Bus Driver
    Location:
    Loughton Essex
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Quite possibly, the dangers of conversational wording not giving clues available face to face, whether by facial expression or intonation.
     
  12. paulhitch

    paulhitch Guest

    Hardly "harsh". Quite apart from the original decision to put the vehicle back in service without it being made safe adequately, the decision to retain it in service for three days after the incident (which was slow in being reported) was jaw dropping. It needed (and got) severe censure. I have heard the view expressed that it could have been more.

    PH
     
  13. Chris86

    Chris86 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2011
    Messages:
    1,328
    Likes Received:
    1,315
    Occupation:
    Safety, Technical and Offroad Driver Trainer
    Location:
    South Yorkshore
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Just to be completely open, I work in Health and Safety- I specialise in helping out with slightly oddball stuff bit do still do bits of fairly general H&S.

    Every incident, near miss, hazard spotted has a path that has lead to it occurring and that is the important bit in terms of learning - so yes, as much as I hate the cliche, there is ALWAYS lessons to be learned - even if (occasionally) that lesson is that actually the systems worked- but something has happened so unforseeable we could never have prevented it.

    There is still a resistance in most industries to resisting reporting near misses and hazards as it is seen as poor performance when actually these are some of the most importance occurences in prevention of future accidents, and analysis of recurring or similar hazards/near misses can steer policies for the future. This incident at the SDR will hopefully be a reminder to ALL heritage operations to check, and recheck their systems for maintenance to make sure they are operating as they should.

    As has been mentioned elsewhere on the thread, a large proportion of accidents happen because of failures in the monitoring and implementation of policies and procedures that are already in place. It is often the combination of a number of small, but systematic failures that lead to a big incident, or in this case a near miss.

    I often go to sites/jobs where, yes, they have all the right paperwork and the management can tell you all the right things and use the current 'buzzwords' but actually the implementation and understanding of the systems elsewhere can be very poor, I always go back to the principals of keeping it simple, making sure that folk are not in the mindset of 'this guy is here to cost us money and tell us how to do our jobs' and making sure that those at the top lead by example.

    For me the key to good H&S practice is that it is all done as part of an overall management strategy, and a good H&S person does not necessarily need to be an expert in all of the tasks but must be an excellent communicator and be able to ask the right questions of the right people, in order to determine how best to manage each specific task safely.
    The H&S person then needs to be able to come up with a method to ensure this information is delivered in accessible way, and that compliance/understanding can be monitored.

    Ill get off my soapbox now

    Chris
     
  14. gwalkeriow

    gwalkeriow Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    1,703
    Likes Received:
    1,727
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired.
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I could not agree more, we are constantly upgrading our exam procedures. If a "new " problem comes to light, it is added to the exam procedure and a full fleet inspection is carried out. If we discover a new piece of equipment that make our lives easier and safer we make every effort to acquire them. The example should be set from the top but sometimes it isn't and a stand needs to be made.

    I have never seen the difference between paid or volunteer, all should approach the job with same professional attitude.
     
  15. The Green Howards

    The Green Howards Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2016
    Messages:
    14,118
    Likes Received:
    7,644
    Occupation:
    Layabout
    Location:
    Naughty step
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Harsh? Normally events like that would attract a six-figure fine, not five.

    What if the ORR and HSE decided that all heritage railways need a paid Board of Management to oversee the correct and safe operation of the railway? How many would survive then?
     
    Last edited: May 23, 2018
    johnofwessex likes this.
  16. twr12

    twr12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2007
    Messages:
    1,540
    Likes Received:
    692
    The only difference between volunteer and paid staff on preserved railways is the selection criteria and line management of them.

    Selection of Directors solely by being elected may not result in people of sufficient knowledge/ skills/ experience to run a safety critical railway organisation.
     
  17. The Green Howards

    The Green Howards Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2016
    Messages:
    14,118
    Likes Received:
    7,644
    Occupation:
    Layabout
    Location:
    Naughty step
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Except I would expect that to be a major criterion in the appointment of candidates- a demonstrable knowledge of railway operations and the HASAWA.
     
  18. estwdjhn

    estwdjhn Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2013
    Messages:
    325
    Likes Received:
    641
    Occupation:
    Boilermaker
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Many railway societies are managed by boards elected by the membership in various ways. Those who the members vote onto such boards may or may not have demonstrable railway knowledge - it's usually down to the membership to decided who to vote for and on what basis...
     
  19. Chris86

    Chris86 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2011
    Messages:
    1,328
    Likes Received:
    1,315
    Occupation:
    Safety, Technical and Offroad Driver Trainer
    Location:
    South Yorkshore
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Not necessarily.

    They either have to be competent/have prior knowledge themselves

    Or;

    Must employ/consult a competent person or body


    Chris
     
    deaftech and The Dainton Banker like this.
  20. huochemi

    huochemi Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    May 6, 2008
    Messages:
    2,751
    Likes Received:
    1,393
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    UK
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    That seems unlikely to me. Setting aside that having a choice would be a nice problem to have for many bodies, and the possibility that the constitution allows persons to be legitimately appointed simply by being proposed and seconded if there is a shortage of candidates (without a vote, or any veto by the incumbent board i.e. no-one is unsuitable barring bankruptcy or mental illness), I suspect that railway operating experience can only be a sine qua non for a particular portfolio(s). Judging by the lamentable standard of annual reports filed by some preserved railways, one might wish for instance that all directors were literate and had financial training (or simply were minded to make the time to read and understand what they were collectively taking responsibility for). It is easy to come up with a cv which requires candidates to be paragons of staff motivation, executive leadership, business, marketing skills etc, which only ensures that no suitable candidate will ever be found. The WSR plc used to publish job descriptions on its website which made for interesting reading. Presumably they were removed to avoid just this sort of gap analysis / discussion.

    But, I do think there is a tendency to think that boards of preserved railways have to have all these specific skills within the board, whereas in reality (and @Chris86 seems to be saying this) it seems rather more realistic to employ / co-opt (to board or committee) persons with the relevant skills, but who do not want to be directors / trustees for whatever reason, or be subject to beauty contests.
     
    The Dainton Banker likes this.

Share This Page