The "wibble" as you call it has been blown completely out of proportion by those who enjoy doing so. The (minor) point was that the train's name conjured up a strong image of Pullmans and that another name might have been better. Those at RYTC should know that the choice of name, etc., may have an impact on potential bookings. HOWEVER, just because some comments have been made on that topic does not detract in the slightest from the very obvious over-riding issue of the return of 35018. Any petulance from those claiming that those daring to comment on some details obviously would prefer no train than a mis-named one, is, frankly, childish and unhelpful. In short; don't think that peoples' comments on detail mean that anyone is losing sight of the bigger picture.