If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Sir Keith Park

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by shedbasher, Jun 29, 2012.

  1. ADB968008

    ADB968008 Guest

    Maybe 34070 could masquerade as 34053… that would be an interesting talking point.
     
  2. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,218
    Likes Received:
    57,925
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer

    The one loco I can't imagine 34053 masquerading as would be 34109...

    Tom
     
    Kje7812, Spamcan81 and Martin Perry like this.
  3. Bulleid Pacific

    Bulleid Pacific Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    3,998
    Likes Received:
    1,054
    Occupation:
    A Thingy...
    Has happened before with 76079 masquerading as 76084, but hasn't been done with a namer. Not really much point, though, as SKP has actually been restored (as has 76084).
     
  4. stuarttrains

    stuarttrains New Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Horden, Co.Durham
    Didn't 34105 'Swanage' run as 34067 'Tangmere' in the early 90's as an April fool one year

    Stuart
     
  5. ADB968008

    ADB968008 Guest

  6. stephenvane

    stephenvane Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2011
    Messages:
    526
    Likes Received:
    399
    Yes it did. Also 34027 Taw Valley ran as 34028 Eddystone on the main line for a while.
     
  7. Big Al

    Big Al Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    May 30, 2009
    Messages:
    21,176
    Likes Received:
    21,008
    Location:
    1016
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Did it? I know it ran as 34045 Ottery St Mary but I must have missed the Eddystone interlude.
     
  8. Martin Perry

    Martin Perry Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    16,515
    Likes Received:
    7,765
    Location:
    1012 / 60158
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    34027 also ran as 34042, briefly, when it visited Llangollen many years ago.
     
  9. Southernman99

    Southernman99 Member Friend

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2009
    Messages:
    903
    Likes Received:
    616
    Ive never heard of 34027 running as 34028? She has run as 34036 and 34045 in her last ticket. She will reppear as 34027 but I believe there is a plan for her to be renumbered as a squadron at some point.

    Sent from my C5303 using Tapatalk
     
  10. John Petley

    John Petley Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2007
    Messages:
    2,852
    Likes Received:
    2,371
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Researcher/writer and composer of classical music
    Location:
    Between LBSCR 221 and LBSCR 227
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I wasn't aware of 34027 ever running as Eddystone. However, besides masquerading as 34045, I think it also was re-numbered 34022 Exmoor for a while when it visited the West Somerset Railway

    Not aware of that, but it has appeared as 34041 Wilton and 34102 Lapford at various times.

    Clan Line has also run disguised as 35017 Belgian Marine on a couple of occasions. I think that the owner of one of 35017's nameplates may be an active MNLPS member.
     
  11. Spamcan81

    Spamcan81 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Messages:
    35,169
    Likes Received:
    20,851
    Occupation:
    Training moles
    Location:
    The back of beyond
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer

    Correct and somewhere I have a picture of it.
     
  12. Spamcan81

    Spamcan81 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Messages:
    35,169
    Likes Received:
    20,851
    Occupation:
    Training moles
    Location:
    The back of beyond
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I think it would be quite fun to pair an original and a rebuild but have them both carry the same identity. That should confuse a few people. :)
     
    jnc and Jamessquared like this.
  13. Martin Perry

    Martin Perry Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    16,515
    Likes Received:
    7,765
    Location:
    1012 / 60158
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Over to you! :D
     
  14. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,218
    Likes Received:
    57,925
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer

    That could be fun. Or even better, have one visit a line that already owns one and swap identities. For example, SKP could visit the Bluebell and run for the duration of a gala in the identity of Sir Archie, while Sir Archie ran in the identity of SKP… :confused:

    Tom
     
  15. Southernman99

    Southernman99 Member Friend

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2009
    Messages:
    903
    Likes Received:
    616
    Just remember to swap the names and numbers back before the guest engine goes back.

    Sent from my C5303 using Tapatalk
     
  16. Martin Perry

    Martin Perry Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    16,515
    Likes Received:
    7,765
    Location:
    1012 / 60158
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    It would certainly save on transport costs :)
     
  17. Bean-counter

    Bean-counter Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2007
    Messages:
    5,844
    Likes Received:
    7,688
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Former NP Member
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer

    Already happened for the dyslexic! Back in 1991 (I think), rebuilt 34027 and Unrebuilt 34072 were both running on the NYMR. A certain driver turned uup one morning, checked the board and started oiling up "his" engine. Some time later another driver appeared and thanked the first driver for kindly oiling up his loco - a slight case of mixing 27 and 72! On other occasions, it has been suggested that named locos of the same class have names swapped so that one is the other on the opposite side, which would confuse more than just drivers!





    Steven
     
  18. stephenvane

    stephenvane Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2011
    Messages:
    526
    Likes Received:
    399
  19. kieranhardy

    kieranhardy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2006
    Messages:
    1,583
    Likes Received:
    699
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Kidderminster
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    34105 has also run as 34051 at the MHR. See here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/johnmi...photolist-9G1SKG-daSt2J-dbwghC-dbwpHu-dbw2cK/

    35005 has also appeared as 34101....! http://www.flickr.com/photos/nick_h...qf-eRo5HH-eLju9N-eKykXV-ezWEFU-ezMsTA-ezGHZR/

    Not to mention 34028 was briefly renumbered to 34016 for last years Swanage gala.

    Would I be right in saying something has run as 34046 in the past? 34027 again possibly?
     
  20. Spamcan81

    Spamcan81 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Messages:
    35,169
    Likes Received:
    20,851
    Occupation:
    Training moles
    Location:
    The back of beyond
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    34039 starred as a "rebuilt" 34081 for a Steam Railway April Fool spoof.
    34081 has appeared as 34057 for a gala on the NNR and a few weeks after that.
     

Share This Page