If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Teifi Valley Railway

Discussion in 'Narrow Gauge Railways' started by Anthony Coulls, Jun 22, 2014.

  1. gwilialan

    gwilialan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2012
    Messages:
    1,698
    Likes Received:
    3,977
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Out there somewhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Relying on old memory I think:- Apart from the remedial work on the 6 or so bridges (and one new one) to get the Gwilli up to Llampumsaint there is then the reinstatement of the 988 yard long Pencander tunnel followed by about 20 houses in Pencander village on the trackbed then reinstating areas of the trackbed being wiped out by farms and then the whole of the Llandysul station site being wiped out by the A486 Llandysul by-pass roundabout, more trackbed loss, refurbish the 167 yard Allt-y-cefn tunnel, and a couple of bridges to be repaced - before you even get to the Teifi.
    Then I think there is still one or two more bridges needed to get to Newcastle Emlyn where the station site was flattened years ago and is now industrial area.
    This doesn't even consider the number of unofficial 'roads' farmers have made on the trackbed or the barns or sheds they have built there.
    Still shouldn't be too much of a problem should it? :eek: :)
     
    Matt78, ghost, Bluenosejohn and 2 others like this.
  2. Meiriongwril

    Meiriongwril Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    836
    Likes Received:
    703
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cymru
    Ah well, twas but a passing fancy!
     
  3. lynbarn

    lynbarn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2006
    Messages:
    1,538
    Likes Received:
    532
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Working in the NHS as a Maintenance Electrician
    Location:
    Kent
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Everyone has a price for which they would sell their land. It is just finding the right person with the money to make it happen. But I would think that boat has sailed and it may now be too toxic for anyone to want to help them out.
     
    Mrcow likes this.
  4. MellishR

    MellishR Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Messages:
    8,758
    Likes Received:
    5,742
    Whether or not anyone might wish to help out the present Teifi Valley management, how would reinstatement of more of the old line help?
     
    ghost likes this.
  5. lynbarn

    lynbarn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2006
    Messages:
    1,538
    Likes Received:
    532
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Working in the NHS as a Maintenance Electrician
    Location:
    Kent
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I was suggesting that if an extension was proposed then the current membership may well think it is worth sticking around to help out, we all know of at least one project that has gone to the wall, but the harsh reality is that that others will follow.

    I am sure that if the Teifi were to be closed due to a lack of tax payments I am sure that most of the stock would find another home, it would be ironic if Sgt Murphy were to somehow end up on the L&BR seeing Colin Pealling's involvement with the L&BR many years ago.
     
  6. MuzTrem

    MuzTrem Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    969
    Likes Received:
    1,270
    But the thing is: even if it were feasible to extend either railway, would it actually drive up their visitor numbers? Or would it just increase their overheads? A longer train ride isn't necessarily a more attractive proposition to non-enthusiast passengers, particularly on a line like the Teifi which (AIUI) has tended to aim mostly at the family market?

    Sent from my SM-A125F using Tapatalk
     
    kscanes, William Fletcher and ghost like this.
  7. Pete Thornhill

    Pete Thornhill Resident of Nat Pres Staff Member Administrator Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Messages:
    7,718
    Likes Received:
    5,820
    They are already working on an extension, albeit back to what they had before. Given the progress so far in what is nearly a decade, I’d say it might be stretching it a bit far…

    In any event, when they do complete putting back what was before there is still room for expansion in the opposite direction, which doesn’t start with requiring a major bridge replacement as the starting point.
     
  8. philip08

    philip08 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2008
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    3
    Some historic information courtesy of the late Rowland Pittard that may be of interest.

    In 1974 the Dyfed County Council finally decided not to retain the Carmarthen to Lampeter and Newcastle Emlyn branch lines. The Teifi Valley Railway Preservation Society decided to proceed with a modest two mile scheme which would be extended if successful that covered the line from Abergwili Junction to Bronwydd Arms. The operating company was known as the Gwili Railway Company Ltd.

    Meanwhile the Dyfed Railway Company (no connection with the TVRPS) were hoping to buy a section of trackbed near Newcastle Emlyn on which to lay a narrow gauge (perhaps metre gauge) line.
     
  9. Matt78

    Matt78 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2007
    Messages:
    1,707
    Likes Received:
    3,654
    Occupation:
    Solicitor
    Location:
    South Wales
    extending the Gwili to Conwil would only add another 3/4 mile so keeps the operation pretty much “as is”, with similar motive power and stock. The difference between this and a further three miles to Llanpumsaint is really “tipping point” in terms of whether the extra numbers will justify the extra expenditure.

    5 miles is optimum in this corner of Wales.

    regards

    Matt
     
  10. Elizabeth Perry

    Elizabeth Perry Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2014
    Messages:
    226
    Likes Received:
    172
    Gender:
    Female
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Interesting discussion about extensions. Spanner in any projected works is the extent of the trackbed sold over the years. Early on the stretch from Pencader Junction to Llandysul Station was sold to a man who moved into the level crossing keepers cottage - because the area had no road access and he intended to lay a miniature railway as a supplementary tourist attraction. His wife left him and the project was abandoned. British Rail refused to give any access to the track at Llandysul from the road. The area between the platforms was sold to a local agricultural merchant who built a shed on it. The stretch from the Llandysul road bridges to the river was sold after years of encroachments by the farmer concerned. Finally the worthless and unusable short stretch with the road bridges went under the Llandysul bypass.
    As those who had worked so hard to obtain the LRO retired or died off the organisation fell victim to political infighting and the importance of Company administration was forgotten.
     
  11. gwilialan

    gwilialan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2012
    Messages:
    1,698
    Likes Received:
    3,977
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Out there somewhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Being quite remote (14 miles from Cardigan and 16 from Carmarthen) does not help. There is generally little passing trade and it's also a long way out and quite small to attract enthusiasts, most visitors are families following those What to do in... guides.
     
  12. Elizabeth Perry

    Elizabeth Perry Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2014
    Messages:
    226
    Likes Received:
    172
    Gender:
    Female
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Back to admin failure - I asked Companies House about the possible consequences of failing to report resignation of a director and am now told that they will be writing to the TVR to ask them BUT "we cannot compel them to provide a response."
    I also asked how long the objection preventing the closure of the Company will last, and they reply 17 June 2025. Then if no further objections are received the Company will be dissolved.
    Hopeless.
     

Share This Page